A Millionaire Sheikh Married a Filipina Beauty Que...

A Millionaire Sheikh Married a Filipina Beauty Queen — He Didn’t Know It Was a Trap – Part 3

You know, the eastern suburbs, particularly of our state or our city, were experiencing hateful just hateful.

I hate Well, we called it the summer of hate, in fact, which was the summer of 24, and it was absolutely shocking.

And I was certainly not proud of who we were.

You know, I I go to and have been going for I’ve been a member for nearly 12 years.

I go to a lot of citizenship ceremonies.

And at those ceremonies, a line I always use, because I’m so proud of it, is we welcome you to be part of our multicultural tapestry, which is so successful in this country, in this state, and in Lake Macquarie.

And I didn’t feel like that then.

I didn’t feel like that then, and I haven’t felt like that since October 2023.

Um and >> Jewish Australians would say the same.

They kind of felt like they were yelling and no one was listening.

>> Yeah.

Well, we put, you know, different things in place, but you’re right.

They’re right.

>> Protests.

During your tenure, you’ve been accused of being not heavy-handed enough, too heavy-handed.

You’ve had both sides of the coin.

I’m talking about the October 2023 pro-Palestinian protest, and then more recently, the Israeli president visited, and you were accused of being too heavy-handed.

Did the the first kind of reaction inform the second reaction in terms of your approach to those two incidents? >> Absolutely.

Uh and I think for all the right reasons.

I mean, those vile scenes down on the steps of the Opera House, of flames being set off, burning flags, were viewed around the world and we uh were seen and probably rightly so as a a society that was celebrating the deaths and killings of innocent residents in Israel overseas.

I mean, shocking, awful.

Horrible.

And yeah, you bet it informed the every decision made from then on because it’s a government’s responsibility to keep your community safe.

And our Jewish community felt the exact opposite to that.

And whilst I, the government, and the police support protests, we support peaceful protests within the framework of the law.

But then with these recent ones when the Israeli president came, I mean, there’s been 800 complaints about police heavy-handedness.

So, did we go too far in the other direction? Look, it was a very volatile situation.

Obviously, we had the you know, we had one group at town hall who were protesting against the Israeli president who was less than a kilometer away as the crow flies down at the ICC.

Again, I just go back to community safety and keeping the community safe.

But I will add one other thing to this and that is that the protesters on that day led by Josh Leis, the one at the town hall, they had made an agreement with the police that it would not be a they would not march, that it would be stagnant a stagnant protest.

They had made that agreement and then towards the end of their speeches as I understand it, they were all starting to you know, close up and people had some people had already started walking off and going home.

There was a group that insisted on defying those agreements that had been made and insisted on taking the police on.

Now, the police had a job to do there and that was they’d made it very clear that no one was going to march.

They’d been offered different routes, a different place to be, but no, no, no, nothing was good enough and, you know, at the end of the day, uh, the LEC, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission, as you say, there’s been complaints made to them, 800 of them.

They will review each and every one of those and if there was poor behavior, bad behavior, etc.

, then that will be called out as it should be.

That is why we have the LEC.

They are there, it’s the only one in the country that specifically looks at our law enforcement arm.

We’re the only ones that have got it in the country.

>> Yep.

So, that’s their job.

>> of the police? >> That’s right, 100% and other jurisdictions have other types, but not that just looks at the law enforcement in our state.

So, that’s their job.

Let them do their job.

Um, I will I support, um, our police keeping our community safe on that day.

Tensions were high, we needed to take the heat out of it.

Um, I would do the same again.

>> As that protest made media headlines, we did see actual footage on our TV screens of police being not just heavy-handed, but quite violent with protesters.

What was it like for you to watch that? >> There is no place for violence on our streets, zero.

I have zero tolerance for it and it doesn’t matter who that is.

But, that will be investigated by the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission and if they find any wrongdoing, then those police officers will be dealt with.

Equally though, all of that footage will also be looked at by police and if anybody has broken the law, then they too will be dealt with.

There was any number of cameras and body worn cameras on on that particular night and all of that footage will be used as evidence.

I need to bring up Claire Nowland because it was a big pressure point for you.

For listeners who don’t know that name, she was a 95-year-old aged care home resident, and she was fatally tased by a New South Wales officer in 2023.

That senior constable has since been found guilty of manslaughter.

There was a lot of criticism about your response, the commissioner’s response from all kind of sides.

The the criticism I’m most interested in is the accusation that you were more focused on defending New South Wales Police during the controversy than acknowledging the kind of public concern about the use of force against a frail older lady.

How do you reflect on your handling of that incident? Um well, again, the use of any force uh is an operational matter for the New South Wales Police.

And I know some people will say, but I’m not a police officer.

I think that’s very important that we know that.

I am not, and I have to be guided by them.

I think that it was shocking.

That’s first and foremost, and I have to say I said that it was shocking like, but should it have been used? Shouldn’t it have been used? That is a decision uh that has then been played out, as you say, in the courts.

Um there was a critical investigation also undertaken at the time, and LECC were also there.

They stand side by side when there’s a critical investigation taking place from the police.

And rightly so, they are the people who should be determining whether or not or what type of force um should be used.

Who should have been there? Should they not have been there at all? All of those things um obviously are examined.

Look, I think you know, going back to your point before, I get criticized for, you know, doing too much, not doing enough.

Um I accept that criticism.

Um I on reflection again I just think it was shocking that a woman lost her life.

Whilst she was in her 90s, she was very sprightly and I spoke to her family and I don’t know if I’ve told anyone that I’ve spoken to her family to be honest with you.

And she may have been that age, but she certainly was still very according to them very fit, still very withered.

I mean she was jumping out of a plane not that many years before believe it or not parachuting.

So she was clearly a woman of spirit and had lived life to the fullest and is that the way that you’d want you know your grandma or your mom or your aunt or family member to to to go and be remembered.

Absolutely not.

It was shocking.

>> Why did you decide to speak to her family? >> I felt that on behalf of the government that that’s very important.

I speak to lots of victims families, family members.

>> Were they appreciative of hearing from you given that it was a police officer that killed them? >> Yes.

They were very polite and very a beautiful family.

A very big family cuz there were lots of kids.

But they were beautiful family.

Yeah.

So in the wake of Clare’s death, an organization did reach out across Australia and offer dementia training to police officers.

Do you think that that could be an important area because I know that New South Wales is yet to take up that offer.

Only the Northern Territory has.

>> Oh look it might be something that law enforcement could look at.

I do know they do have a lot of different modules that they deal with down at Goulburn during that training period.

For instance, Autism Australia provides some assistance which is really useful particularly uh, when a child with autism goes missing, there are certain, um, things that you should put in place specifically for people or young people with autism, which was fascinating.

I found it fascinating.

And a whole host of other, um, types of modules addressing specific, um, groups as well.

So, it’s certainly something that we could, um, mention and and look at.

>> This criticism of, you know, I’m I’m saying in quotations, the too heavy-handed and defending police of being heavy-handed, that seems to come up a lot.

You know, the protests, Clennon Hall, and can you see where it’s coming from? Do you Do you see that criticism’s point of view? >> I can see that people are saying that and why they’re saying that.

Um, but again, police are our law enforcement officers, and we don’t want them doing the wrong thing.

That’s for sure.

And they will be called out if they are.

Uh, you know, and we’ve seen that over and over again.

Uh, like just in the short time that I’ve been the minister, there have been a number of police removed from the New South Wales Police Force because of excessive force or bad behavior or both.

Uh, and as they should be, quite frankly.

Uh, that’s just in short 3 years.

So, you know, it it is the case that it’s, um, I don’t I’m not defending or standing up for excessive force.

No way in the world.

Um, we should not have violence on our streets, and violence on our streets should definitely not from police officers.

And as I say, if that is the case, then the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission will investigate that, um, and will provide recommendations.

As they should, that’s what their job is.

The New South Wales Police is the organization that people will pick up the phone to ring triple zero when they need them.

And I have to say that uh, that is most people’s interaction with police.

Now, your listeners might sit here and think that I’m defending them yet again, but that’s just a reality.

They They go to nearly 2 million They get nearly 2 million calls a year.

Now, that’s insane numbers, isn’t it? >> Yeah.

>> So, you know, I I get that and and we hear a lot about the bad behavior and we hear a lot about uh use of force.

And again, call it out if that is the case.

>> Yeah.

>> Of course, you should.

But, in some context, then I would say uh remember also that the 20,000 police officers are all people in the New South Wales police that we have out there.

It’s a large organization.

99% of them are not doing that.

>> Youth crime, another very hot topic at the moment all over the country, really.

I know we’re talking about New South Wales, but our listeners are from everywhere and it is you know, you see it playing out in Melbourne and Victoria and Queensland.

Uh We’re constantly hearing about regional crime waves involving young people.

This is something that you’ve recently tackled with some legislation.

Can you talk us through what those changes are and and what you’re hoping we’ll see from them? >> Yeah, I think um if you don’t mind, I’ll just start at the beginning.

And again, this was uh coming into uh the cabinet room and uh our cabinet is 50% women.

>> Mhm.

>> And this youth crime wave began anyway.

We’re sitting around and, you know, this new set of eyes sitting there going, “Well, hold up.

This is just seasonal police.

Like, we just can’t arrest our way out of this.

This is a problem and these are young people who we need to put on a different path.

” So, speaking to the Attorney General, the uh the Minister for Corrections, Juvenile Justice, etc.

, etc.

There’s about six of us in the portfolios, right? And so, we’re like, “Yeah, we’ve got to do something else than just arrest these kids.

There has to be more to this.

So, that’s why we made the legislative changes.

Um so, police made some changes.

They had operation Saturnia and operation Sweetnam, which is Sweetnam is here in the city in metropolitan areas.

Operation Saturnia is out in our regional areas.

And that was a real focus on hot crime spot areas.

So, that was important.

Um and that took a lot of the ringleaders out of the equation and, you know, touch wood.

We haven’t been It is a lot more under control as we sit here today.

Um but, uh some other areas of concern were the posting and boasting.

So, they uh were stealing cars and going on joyrides, filming it, and then posting it.

Um so, that is now an offense.

Uh uh break and enter into a home.

So, they are so brazen breaking and entering into a home.

Uh filming that in some instances as well, like while people are sleeping with a knife over their head and the like.

Like, horrific.

>> It’s just teenagers.

It’s just wild.

>> Well, young teenagers.

Some of them like 11, 12, 13.

>> to me.

>> I know.

I know.

>> [laughter] >> I’m still playing with Barbies, I think.

>> me too.

I was nowhere near a knife, but anyway.

>> [laughter] >> Um no, me either.

Um also, I would have got into massive trouble.

Like, I I if you weren’t in bed asleep, then you would have got into big trouble at my house.

There’s those changes that we’ve made.

Um oh, and so, two break and enters, um then you can the judge has to consider whether or not to give you bail or not.

So, we’re seeing that change, which has been good.

But, the thing that’s most significant is the funding that we’ve sent through through all of us uh working together, the funding that we’ve injected into those communities for preventative and proactive um results.

And we’re getting some really good results, which is fantastic, we’re told by locals on the ground, so that’s good.

Um, and we’re also in Moree, uh, building the the place-based facility there, where if you have a recidivist offender, they can choose to go there, and they’ll have wrap-around services, etc.

So, um, they’ll be safe, they’ll get, uh, the care they need, and we’ll have health there as well, education.

So, the services will be wrapped around them, and we hope to really steer those young people away from crime to a better life.

>> And it sounds like we’re already seeing some results there.

>> I think so.

I I think it’s, um, I don’t want to get too, um, uh, you know, talk it up too much.

There’s always more work to do.

Like, yeah, there’s crime in in these little rural towns, or big rural towns, really, and and remote and regional areas, um, but we’re seeing some green shoots.

>> Mhm.

>> Um, police is saying that, community is saying that.

Like, you can’t just go into a community and do this, that, and the other.

And I think that’s the thing that this government has done really well.

We’ve worked with the community.

So, local government will be at the table, the local services will be at the table, education, health, you name it, we work collaboratively, and um, I have traveled this state with police doing exactly that, working with the community stakeholders for solutions.

We’re not here to point the finger, we’re not here to do anything but solutions.

And if we can change some of those young people’s lives out of the criminal justice system onto a successful life, then wow, what a wonderful legacy that would be.

What about systemic bias against Indigenous people in our country? Are we seeing any green shoots in the right direction there? Because that is an issue that we’ve had for years, decades, long before you ever took, you know, these portfolios.

But, last year New South Wales recorded near record Indigenous deaths in custody.

What do we do with that information? How do we fix this? >> Well, you’re quite right.

Also, our rates of incarceration >> Mhm.

>> are increasing, and particularly women.

>> Yeah.

>> We have to continue to keep working away at this.

I want to say this though, my mate, the Minister for the Communities Services, Kate Washington, um she has She’s one of those women that sits around that table with me, banging the table.

>> [laughter] >> She um she has There are now no children living in hotels who are in out-of-home care.

Now, there were more than 100 when we came to government, and these were kids who were too hard, too difficult.

Kids that had been had horrible, awful lives.

So, we’re chipping away.

>> Mhm.

>> We’re chipping away.

And a lot of those kids would have been uh First Nations kids, to be fair.

So, she’s doing great work, amazing work um in that area.

But, there’s so much to do.

I have to be honest with you, Gemma, there is so much to do.

There is a lot of societal need, and I think working as a group and bouncing stuff off each other, and working collaboratively instead of just working in silos, is making some difference.

Mhm.

I get it that people think it’s at glacial pace, but we really are just digging away, digging away.

Like, everything that happens in police world, I’m like, that’s the crisis end.

So, I’m in there so as police don’t have to do that, so they’re out doing other stuff.

Because that’s the the goal, right? >> Yeah.

>> Not to be locking up kids.

>> [laughter] >> Very true.

>> That’s the goal.

Um you know, obviously, I don’t know that I’ll ever be able to meet that absolute goal, but putting kids on a different pathway, um you know, giving I I We were up in um Tamworth with the premier, actually, making an announcement about a significant investment into youth services, and there was a group up there, and I just can’t recall their name now, but I’ll come back to you with the name of them, and they were they had indigenous kids, and they were setting them on a pathway of uh into jobs, and their success rates were fantastic.

These are the sorts of organizations that the premier and I assist supporting, um because they’ve got, you know, they’re not just doing a service, and you don’t sort of see any outcomes.

They’re actually delivering the goods, and that’s what you want to see.

And the kids were there, the young young men, they’re all young men, and I was sitting chatting with them, and they were just telling me it was fantastic, you know, yeah, helping them get their license, helping them the things we all take for granted, many of us.

Um and these kids don’t have the role models in their or or the stable family life that we take for granted, and having people in community replacing those roles is critical.

Um they’re the biggest-hearted, most valuable people that you’d ever wish to meet, and they are wrapping themselves around these kids, assisting them to leave crime, and to go on a pathway away from crime, and to be a success.

>> Amazing.

Ivan Milat is a name most listeners will know.

Uh he’s come up a lot in some of the cold cases that have been covered in New South Wales.

We’ve had a lot of missing and murdered women, and his name has popped up as a potential kind of perpetrator in those cases, and now we’re looking at a New South Wales parliamentary inquiry into some of those cases.

I know that you don’t have much involvement in that inquiry, but as police minister, what are your thoughts on it, and what’s what has been your involvement in it? >> Yeah, so Jeremy Buckingham um is the lead on on this inquiry, and I have actually worked closely with Jeremy as the police minister in terms of having him be briefed by senior police, uh making sure that he is um aware of what the work police are doing.

I think it’s often the case that we don’t understand or don’t have any knowledge of what police are actually doing in the the background, cuz they don’t tell us much.

>> No, it’s all secret business.

>> Correct, [laughter] correct.

Um so, in saying that though, when there’s an inquiry like this, cuz it was quite broad-reaching, and we have to make sure that we don’t um use, you know, all the police resources that we’ve got on that, whilst over here we’ve got, you know, domestic violence, public place shootings, um counterterrorism issues, all of that sort of stuff.

I don’t think I need to describe to your listeners um what the work that they do.

Yeah, that’s right.

That Yeah.

Oh, yeah, your listeners know priorities, all right.

They’re a woman, a mother, [laughter] a wife.

All of that A daughter.

Got to make sure you fit mom and dad in at some time as well.

So, I have actually uh assisted a lot to make sure that he has been fully briefed, and that the scope of the inquiry is quite specific.

Um so, that’s a good thing.

>> So, it doesn’t waste, like you say, resources, time, etc.

>> Spot on.

That’s right.

Yeah.

So, that’s great um when it gets going, and um the the scope is quite specific, and police are more than happy to work with him.

Like, from our perspective, we’re more than happy to work with him.

There’ll be other people coming in, of course, um but into the inquiry, uh but yeah, no, police have I I think that he would say that they’ve been fantastic.

It is crazy to think that we’re going to have an inquiry into Ivan Milat.

He’s been dead many years now.

His crimes were, you know, a few decades ago.

>> Yeah, police haven’t discounted though that there may be um other uh murders that they discover that he has been part of.

Um so, I I do know that for sure.

So, they’re quite, you know, open-minded about, you know, if they do find any that they’ve got the evidence there to be able to make the links like when we were talking about having the evidence, making sure we keep all of the evidence um you know, in you know, a state that’s easy to find um and we put a lot of money into doing that, which is great.

Prior to the special commission of inquiry uh by Justice Sackar, uh there was evidence in different locations around the state.

Um we’ve now brought all of that together, which is critically important and it’s all been properly logged, etc.

>> I’m curious about the personal side of this job because as >> we’ve touched on, it is one that attracts a lot of criticism, you know, a lot of anger from members of the public.

Has your personal safety or your family’s personal safety been something you’ve had to think about? >> Sadly, yes.

>> Mhm.

>> Yeah.

Um but don’t you find that, you know, people are so willing now to be a keyboard warrior and say whatever the bloody hell they want behind a screen? >> Yeah, 100%.

>> Um I I’m pretty I’m just pretty tough, right? And if somebody wants to say something to me, come and say it to me.

I’ll have the conversation with you and whether we agree or not, that’s fine.

Um but I don’t walk away from my problems.

I don’t walk away from um if I’ve done something wrong, I’ll admit it.

I don’t walk away from anything.

Um and that’s just who I am.

I think growing up in a working-class family with not much and that’s just who I am.

But if you’ve got a criticism of me, um you know, come and and see me.

My family are not in this job.

It’s my job.

My staff, they’re not open game, either.

I worry about them.

Um, there are a lot of people out there who uh that type things that I don’t think those words would ever exit their mouth.

And they’re vile, they’re offensive, and they’re threatening.

Which is not fair.

You’re just doing your job.

True.

Yeah.

I Look, I’m not alone, unfortunately.

I think public figures Yeah.

generally um are probably receiving more vitriol than ever before.

And I mean, good, we’ve seen murders, you know, in both the UK, that young um MP that was out doing a street stall got stabbed.

We saw the in um America um shooting like I I hope to God we never see that here.

Um, but again, if you know of anyone who’s doing it, then call it out.

Like, I saw that stuff on the the the um thing about just into Alan down in ditch the witch.

Mm.

You know what? That is wrong.

Call it out.

And I say this, go back.

This is a lesson I learned from the Jewish community, quite frankly.

Go back to our conversation and back to 2023.

And they felt vulnerable and they felt like they were being attacked.

And listen to them.

Listen to them and act.

Don’t accept it.

Don’t accept it from women because it’s that sort of behavior that leads to the type of behavior that we talked about.

The control, the behaviors, ultimately it could be the death of a woman.

If we don’t call all this stuff out, then shame on us.

>> Lastly, Yassmin, what do you want True Crime Conversations and listeners to walk away from after listening to us because every week they’re hearing about the most horrible things that humans can do to other people.

And often, unfortunately, they’re also hearing about you know, issues that the victims or families are coming up against with police or courts or perpetrators getting back out.

What do you want them to take from hearing about the inside process of what it means to change the systems? It’s a pretty simple message from me, and it’s um if you see something that does not sit right with you, then report it.

That means if you see a person treating someone wrong, report it or say something to someone.

If you see a police officer doing the wrong thing, do the same.

If you see anybody um harassing a person because of their race or their sexuality or that they’re a female, say something.

If we don’t stand up for one another and become that society that look after each other, then we will continue to disintegrate.

>> So, you think even within those systems, the police systems, speak up if it’s not working for you.

If the court systems, >> Yes, 100%.

There are so many oversight bodies there to look at these things.

Go to your local member.

I mean, I’m a local member at the end of the day, and I have people coming in telling me all sorts of grievances with whoever it is.

It’s usually the last port of call, you know, they people are frustrated, they’ve called this one and done this and done that, and they’ve just like hit a brick wall.

And then they end up in my office on the Pacific Highway at Swansea.

>> [laughter] >> They come in and I say, “Well, sit down and let’s go through it.

” So, we do.

And it’s important that you do do that.

And maybe you may not get the result that you were looking for, but you’ll certainly have it looked at.

That’s what’s important, and you need to know that in a democracy, in our democracy, that you have the ability to do that because of our electoral system that we our voting system.

The person that is there that you elected will stand up for you.

>> I think that’s a good place to end.

Thank you for joining us, Yasmine.

>> It’s been a pleasure.

>> Thank you to Yasmine Catley for joining us on this episode.

If you liked this episode, please leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts and Spotify to let us know.

And if you aren’t following us on TikTok and Instagram, our handle is True Crime Conversations.

Thank you so much for listening.

I’ll be back next week with another True Crime Conversation.

« Prev

Related Articles