It Was Just a Photo of Two Children — But Look Closely at the Doll Between Them !!!

thumbnail

Rachel Morrison carefully unwrapped the package that had arrived at the Atlanta History Museum that morning.

Inside, protected by layers of acid-free tissue paper, was a single photograph in a simple wooden frame.

The accompanying note typed on plain paper was brief.

Found hidden in my grandmother’s attic.

Never knew this existed.

Thought you should have it.

Please investigate.

No return address, no name, just the photograph and the cryptic message.

Rachel studied the image under her desk lamp.

It showed two young girls, perhaps seven or 8 years old, sitting together on what appeared to be a garden bench surrounded by flowering bushes.

Both wore simple summer dresses typical of the 1890s.

One girl was white with light hair pulled back in a ribbon.

The other was black with her hair braided neatly.

They sat close together, not touching, but comfortable in their proximity, both with their hands reaching toward a porcelain doll positioned carefully between them.

What struck Rachel immediately was the unusual intimacy of the composition.

In the segregated South of the 1890s, such a photograph would have been socially unacceptable, even dangerous to create.

White children and black children simply didn’t pose together as equals in formal photographs from that era.

She turned the frame over and carefully removed the backing.

On the reverse of the photograph in faded pencil, someone had written summer 1895, the garden.

No last names, no location details, just initials and a date.

Rachel grabbed her magnifying glass and examined the image more closely.

The photograph was in remarkably good condition for its age, suggesting it had been carefully stored, probably in darkness.

The girl’s faces showed clearly both looking directly at the camera with serious expressions typical of long exposure times.

But it was the doll that caught Rachel’s attention as she increased magnification.

The porcelain doll appeared expensive, the kind wealthy families would buy for their daughters.

It wore an elaborate lace dress, but something about its face looked odd.

Rachel squinted, adjusting the angle of her lamp.

Was she seeing this correctly?

She needed better equipment.

She carried the photograph to the museum’s conservation lab where they had digital microscopy tools for examining artifacts in extreme detail.

Her colleague James was working late, hunched over a Civil War era sword.

“James, can I use the digital scope”?

“I need to examine something,” he looked up, curious.

“Sure, what have you got”?

“I’m not entirely sure yet,” Rachel replied, positioning the photograph under the highowered digital microscope connected to a large monitor.

She focused on the doll’s face and slowly increased magnification.

As the image enlarged on screen, both she and James leaned forward simultaneously.

“Is that James started”?

“I think so,” Rachel whispered.

The doll’s porcelain face was painted in two distinct halves.

“The left side was the typical pale white of Victorian dolls, but the right side had been carefully painted brown, not damage or deterioration, but deliberate modification.

Someone had transformed this doll to have a face divided perfectly down the middle, half white, half black.

I’ve never seen anything like this, James said quietly.

That’s intentional, right?

Not some kind of manufacturing defect.

Definitely intentional, Rachel confirmed, her heart racing.

Look at the precision of the paint line.

Someone modified this doll very carefully.

And these two girls, dot dot dot, she gestured at the photograph, are sharing it.

one white, one black, with a doll that represents both of them.

Rachel spent the next 3 days obsessed with the photograph.

She’d made highresolution scans and had them printed large scale, allowing her to study every detail.

The garden setting, the girl’s clothing, the mysterious doll each element offered clues about who these children were and why their photograph had been hidden for over a century.

She showed the image to Dr Patricia Washington, the museum’s director and an expert on African-Amean history in the South.

Patricia studied it in silence for several minutes, her expression growing more moved as she absorbed what she was seeing.

Rachel, do you understand how extraordinary this is?

Patricia finally said 1895 Atlanta.

Jim Crow laws were being aggressively enforced.

Segregation was becoming more rigid, not less.

Black and white children playing together would have been seen as threatening to the entire social order.

And someone photographed them sharing a doll that was modified to represent both races.

She shook her head in wonder.

This is an act of radical love and defiance.

I need to find out who they were.

Rachel said, “The initials are E and S.

I’m guessing Emma and Sarah or Elizabeth and Susan”.

or the combinations are endless, but someone cared enough to take this photograph and preserve it, even if they had to hide it.

Patricia nodded.

Start with Atlanta city directories and census records from 1890 to 1900.

Look for white families with daughters named E something living near black families with daughters named Some.

The garden suggests a residential neighborhood where their yards might have connected.

Also, check church records.

Sometimes they documented children’s activities.

Rachel dove into research.

Atlanta in 1895 was a city still recovering from the Civil War while simultaneously entrenching racial segregation.

The photograph represented something that shouldn’t have existed, a friendship that crossed the color.

Line society was working so hard to maintain.

She found dozens of Emma’s and Elizabeth’s and white families and numerous Sarah and Susans and black families.

But connecting specific families who lived near each other was proving difficult.

Property records from that era were incomplete and many black families addresses were poorly documented.

Then Rachel remembered the garden.

She examined the photograph again, focusing on the background vegetation.

The flowering bushes looked like chameleas which bloomed in late winter and early spring in Atlanta.

And behind the girls, partially visible, was what appeared to be a brick wall with distinctive decorative iron work.

She reached out to Dr Henry Palmer, a retired professor of architecture at Georgia Tech, who specialized in historic Atlanta gardens and estates.

When she emailed him the photograph, he called her within an hour.

“That iron work,” he said excitedly, “is from the Wellington estate.

I’d recognize that pattern anywhere.

It was a distinctive design used only on properties designed by architect James Burton in the 1880s.

There were only about 15 homes in Atlanta with that iron work, all in the Inman Park area.

Rachel felt a surge of hope.

Inman Park in the 1890s had been one of Atlanta’s first planned suburbs with large homes on spacious lots.

If she could narrow down which Wellington estate this was, she could identify the families who lived there.

Armed with Dr Palmer’s information, Rachel focused her research on Inman Park properties with Burton Ironwork from the 1890s.

She spent hours in the Atlanta History C Center’s archives pouring over property records, old photographs of the neighborhood, and maps showing lot divisions.

She found it in a property survey map from 1894, the Wellington estate at 247 Elizabeth Street, owned by Charles and Margaret Wellington.

The property featured the distinctive Burton Ironwork and extensive gardens.

City directory listings showed Charles Wellington was a prosperous cotton merchant with two daughters.

Rachel’s hands trembled as she pulled up the 1890 census.

There, Charles Wellington, age 42, Margaret Wellington, age 38, daughters Emma Wellington, age 5, and Carolyn Wellington, age three.

Emma would have been about 10 by 1895, the right age for the girl in the photograph.

Now, she needed to find the black family.

In 1895, it was common for black families to live in small houses or quarters behind the main estates of white families, especially if they worked as domestic staff.

Rachel searched employment records and found what she was looking for.

The Wellingtons employed a woman named Martha Freeman as their cook from 1888 to 1,899.

The 1890 census listed Martha Freeman, age 35, negro widow, living with her daughter Sarah Freeman, age six.

Sarah, the right age, the right initial.

Rachel felt certain she’d found them.

She researched further, finding pieces of both family stories.

Charles Wellington had died in 1897.

Margaret and the daughters had moved to a smaller house in 1898, no longer able to maintain the large estate.

Martha Freeman had continued working for the family until 1899 when the trail went cold.

No further records of her employment in Atlanta.

What had happened to Emma and Sarah?

Had their friendship survived the forced separation that surely came when the family circumstances changed?

Rachel needed more information.

She decided to look for descendants of both families.

Finding Wellington descendants was relatively straightforward.

The family had remained prominent in Atlanta society, but tracking Sarah Freeman proved more difficult.

The name was common, and recordkeeping for black families in the late 1800s was often incomplete or non-existent.

After 2 weeks of exhaustive searching through marriage records, death certificates, and cemetery records, Rachel found a lead.

Sarah Freeman had married Joseph Anderson in Atlanta in 1908.

They’d had four children and moved to Philadelphia in 1912, part of the Great Migration.

Sarah had died there in 1963.

Through genealogy websites and social media, Rachel located descendants.

Sarah’s greatg granddaughter, Dr Denise Anderson, was a retired professor living in Philadelphia.

When Rachel called her and explained what she’d found, there was a long silence on the phone.

“My great-g grandandmother Sarah rarely spoke about her childhood in Atlanta,” Denise finally said, her voice thick with emotion.

But she told my grandmother once about a white girl she’d loved like a sister, a girl she’d had to leave behind.

She said they’d shared everything, even a special doll.

We always thought it was just a wisful story, maybe exaggerated or invented.

Are you telling me it was real?

While waiting for Denise to travel from Philadelphia to Atlanta, Rachel tracked down Emma Wellington’s descendants.

Emma had married in 1905, becoming Emma Sutherland.

She’d had three children and lived in Atlanta until her death in 1958.

Her grandson Thomas Sutherland, now 75, lived in Decar, just outside Atlanta.

Rachel called Thomas and arranged to meet him at his home.

He welcomed her into a house filled with family antiques and photographs.

When Rachel showed him the photograph of the two girls with the doll, Thomas stared at it for a long moment, then walked to an antique secretary desk in the corner.

I need to show you something,” he said quietly.

He unlocked a drawer and pulled out a small wooden box.

Inside, wrapped carefully in yellowed tissue paper, was half of a porcelain doll.

The head and left side of the torso, one arm part of the elaborate lace dress.

The face was painted half white.

Rachel’s breath caught.

“You have half the doll.

My grandmother kept it her entire life,” Thomas said.

She told my father it was her most precious possession from her dearest friend.

She never explained who the friend was or why the doll was cut in half.

When she died, my father found this in her jewelry box with a note for Sarah.

She has the other half.

Someday we’ll put it back together.

Thomas’s eyes were wet.

I never knew who Sarah was.

My grandmother wouldn’t speak about her childhood much.

She seemed sad about it, like she’d lost something precious.

Now I understand.

She lost her friend.

Rachel gently removed the doll half from its wrapping and photographed it extensively.

The craftsmanship was remarkable expensive French porcelain, probably from the 1890s.

But what moved her most was the evidence of the deliberate modification.

Someone had carefully painted half the face brown, transforming it from a standard white doll into something unique and meaningful.

“Who do you think modified the doll”?

Rachel asked Thomas considered my great-g grandandmother Margaret Emma’s mother was known in the family as someone who had unconventional views.

According to family stories, she believed in education for everyone, including former slaves.

She apparently caused scandal by teaching reading to her household staff.

My father said there were whispers that she’d been involved in some kind of progressive religious movement before the Civil War.

So, she might have allowed even encouraged the friendship between Emma and Sarah.

Rachel said, “More than that,” Thomas replied.

“She might have modified the doll herself.

It would have been an extraordinary thing to do.

Give your white daughter a toy that represented racial equality”.

In 1895 Atlanta, that could have been dangerous.

Rachel explained that Denise Anderson, Sarah’s great-granddaughter, was coming to Atlanta.

Thomas’s face lit up.

“She has the other half”.

I don’t know yet, Rachel admitted, but we’re about to find out.

Denise Anderson arrived in Atlanta on a Thursday morning.

Rachel had arranged for her and Thomas Sutherland to meet at the museum, neutral ground for what promised to be an emotional encounter.

When Denise walked into Rachel’s office carrying a small vintage suitcase, Rachel’s heart raced with anticipation.

“I went through my great-g grandandmother’s things that my mother kept,” Denise said, her voice shaking slightly.

“I found this”.

She opened the suitcase and removed a fabric wrapped bundle.

Inside was the right half of a porcelain doll head.

Torso, arm, part of a lace dress.

The face was painted half brown.

Rachel and Thomas stared at it in wonder.

When Thomas placed his grandmother’s half next to Denise’s great-g grandandmother’s half, they fit perfectly.

The doll was complete again after 129 years of separation.

Both descendants were crying.

Rachel found herself wiping tears as well.

The symbolism was overwhelming.

Two halves of a deliberately modified doll, preserved separately by two friends forced apart by circumstance and segregation.

Each keeping their half as a reminder of a love that society said shouldn’t exist.

They cut it in half when they knew they had to separate, Denise said softly.

So they’d each have something to remember.

Thomas nodded.

My grandmother kept it until she died at 73.

That means she held on to this for over 60 years.

She never forgot Sarah.

Rachel had arranged for a photographer to document the reunion of the doll halves.

As they positioned the pieces together, she asked both descendants to share what they knew of the friendship from family stories.

Thomas went first.

My father said grandmother Emma had been a sad woman, especially when she was older.

She never talked much about her childhood, but once when my father was a teenager, she told him she’d had a sister once.

Not by blood, but by choice.

She said the sister had been taken away from her and she’d spent her whole life regretting that she hadn’t fought harder to keep their friendship.

Denise’s story complimented Thomas’s great grandma Sarah told my grandmother that she’d loved a white girl in Atlanta like they were twins.

She said this girl’s mother was kind, that she treated Sarah like her own daughter, teaching her to read and letting the girls play together.

But when the girl’s father died, everything changed.

The family lost money.

Sarah’s mother lost her job and they had to leave Atlanta.

Great grandma Sarah said she’d cried for months.

She kept half a doll her whole life to remember.

“Did your great grandmother say anything about the doll being modified”?

Rachel asked Denise.

“Yes,” Denise exclaimed.

She told my grandmother the girl’s mother had painted the doll for them, half white and half brown, so that each girl could see herself in it.

She said it was the kindest thing anyone had ever done, acknowledging that both of them deserve to be seen and represented.

With the identities of the girls confirmed and the doll reunited, Rachel focused on understanding Margaret Wellington, the woman who’d apparently facilitated this extraordinary friendship.

She returned to archives, this time looking specifically for information about Margaret’s life and beliefs.

What she discovered was remarkable.

Margaret Wellington, born Margaret Hayes in 1852, had grown up in a progressive Quaker family in Pennsylvania.

She’d moved to Atlanta in 1878 to teach at a school for freed slaves, where she met Charles Wellington, whose family disapproved of her northern progressive views, but who married her anyway in 1880.

Rachel found letters Margaret had written to her sister in Pennsylvania, preserved in a collection at Sworthmore College’s Friends historical library.

In one letter from 1889, Margaret wrote, “Charles allows me my eccentricities, though his family finds me troublesome.

I teach Martha’s daughter Sarah alongside Emma.

They are like sisters, and I will not have Sarah grow up believing herself inferior simply because society insists upon it.

I am raising Emma to see the humanity in all people”.

Another letter from 8092 was even more explicit.

Emma asked why Sarah cannot come to her birthday party with her school friends.

I explained that the other families would not approve.

Emma wept and said it was wrong.

She is right.

Of course, it is monstrously wrong.

I am determined that my daughters will not absorb the poison of racial hatred that surrounds us.

Whatever small acts of defiance I can manage, I will.

Then Rachel found the letter that explained the doll.

Dated June 1895.

Margaret wrote to her sister.

For the girl’s birthday, Emma and Sarah share a birth month.

I have done something that would scandalize all of Atlanta if it were known.

I purchased an expensive French doll and modified it.

I painted half its face to represent Sarah.

The girls were delighted, each seeing themselves reflected.

They play with it together in the back garden where prying eyes cannot see.

I know this friendship cannot last.

Society will not permit it.

But I am determined that both girls remember there was a time when they loved each other simply as friends when race was not yet a barrier between them.

That memory might sustain them through the hateful world they will inherit.

Rachel sat back moved by Margaret’s words.

This woman had understood exactly what she was doing, creating a memory of equality and friendship that could survive for separation.

The photograph had been part of that same impulse.

documentation that the friendship had existed, proof that love could transcend the division society imposed.

She shared the letters with Thomas and Denise.

Both were deeply moved.

“My great great grandmother was brave,” Thomas said quietly.

“She could have faced serious social consequences for this”.

Continue reading….
Next »