What I’m about to tell you will challenge everything you think you know about divine purpose, parental failure, and the mysterious ways God transforms brokenness into mission.

My name is Franchesco Benedeti.

I am 45 years old.

I’m a civil engineer in Milan and father of Matteo, a 9-year-old boy who was born with spinobipida and has used a wheelchair since his first years of life.

What happened on May 3rd, 2024, the birthday anniversary of Carlo Acutis, when I finally managed to take Mateo to the young blessed tomb in Aizi, revealed a truth about divine acceptance and purpose that not only transformed my son’s perspective about his disability, but moved dozens of pilgrims present and forever changed my understanding of God’s plans for special children.

Mateo was born on January 15th, 2015, and since the prenatal diagnosis of Spinoipida, our family faced a devastating emotional roller coaster that nearly destroyed everything I thought I knew about faith, fatherhood, and the meaning of suffering.

My wife Elena and I spent years immersed in feelings of guilt, anger against God, and despair about our son’s future.

As an engineer, I had always believed that every problem had technical solutions, that life could be measured, calculated, and controlled through proper planning and execution.

But Mateo’s disability completely challenged my mentality of fix and control.

He developed hydrophilis, underwent 12 surgeries before age seven, and doctors were always brutally honest.

He would never walk, would have significant cognitive limitations, and would depend on specialized care for his entire life.

The prognosis hit me like a building collapse.

Everything I had constructed about what fatherhood meant, what success looked like, what a normal family should be crumbled into rubble.

During the first years, Matteo was a revolted and depressed child, and his questions haunted me day and night.

He would cry constantly asking why God had made him broken while other children could run and play normally.

I had no answers.

As a man who built bridges and designed structures that could withstand earthquakes, I felt completely helpless before my son’s condition.

My engineering served nothing in the face of a congenital disability that no blueprint could fix, no calculation could solve.

Ellen and I drifted away from Catholic faith, questioning how a loving God would allow so much suffering in an innocent child.

The daily physical therapies were torture for all of us.

Mateo would scream that he preferred to be in heaven with the angels rather than live trapped in this chair forever.

Those words broke something inside me that I wasn’t sure could ever be repaired.

But what I discovered on that May afternoon in Aisi wasn’t just another story of family struggle with disability.

What I witnessed was a supernatural intervention so powerful and transformative that it not only gave my son a completely new understanding of his purpose, but revealed to me that what I had seen as divine failure was actually divine design, and that sometimes God’s greatest masterpieces come wrapped in packages the world considers broken.

For 4 years, I carried a secret shame that ate away at me every single day.

I felt I had failed as a father, as a protector, as a man.

When other engineers at work talked about their children’s soccer games, school achievements, or family vacations, I would make excuses to avoid sharing about Matteo.

Not because I was ashamed of him, but because I was ashamed of my inability to fix what was wrong with him.

At night, I would lie awake calculating everything we had done wrong during Elena’s pregnancy, researching experimental treatments we couldn’t afford, designing wheelchair modifications that might give Matteo more independence.

But underneath all my engineering efforts was a deeper question that tormented me.

Why had God chosen us for this trial? What had we done to deserve watching our child suffer while other families enjoyed normal children? In March 2024, my brother Petro, who is a priest, told me about Carlo Akudis, the young Italian who was born on May 3rd, 1991 in London, died on October 12th, 2006 at age 15, victim of fulminant leukemia and was beatified on October 10th, 2020.

Pro told me that Carlo was known for his contagious joy despite illness, for his passion for programming, and for cataloging eucharistic miracles using computers.

Franchesco, my brother said, with that gentle persistence that characterized him.

Carlo might be able to teach Mateo something about finding purpose in the midst of suffering.

This young man transformed his own illness into a mission of hope.

Initially, I rejected the idea completely.

As a skeptical engineer, I considered devotion to saints an emotional crutch for weak people who couldn’t face reality with science and logic.

I believed in concrete solutions, measurable results, technological progress, not mystical interventions from dead teenagers.

But Mateo, who had overheard our conversation from his wheelchair in the adjacent room, became fascinated.

Papa, did he like computers like me? And did he die young like I might die? The brutal innocence of the question destroyed me.

I realized that my son was searching for someone who understood his reality of limitations and premature mortality, realities I had been desperately trying to hide from him.

What happened next would begin a transformation that neither my engineering education nor my parental experience had prepared me for.

My name is Franchesco Benedeti.

And to understand the magnitude of what happened to my family through Carlo Audis, you need to know the complete story of how a man who built structures for a living learned that the most important foundations can’t be measured with instruments or designed with blueprints.

They can only be discovered through surrender to mysteries that engineering school never taught me to solve.

I was born on September 8th, 1978 in Milan into a middle-class Catholic family where faith and reason were considered compatible virtues.

My father, Georgia Benedeti, was a mathematics professor at the University of Milan, and my mother, Anna, was a nurse at San Rafael Hospital.

They raised my brother Petro and me with deep respect for both scientific methodology and religious tradition, showing us that intellectual rigor and spiritual devotion could coexist beautifully.

From childhood, I was fascinated by how things worked, how structures stood up, how problems could be solved through careful analysis and precise execution.

I built elaborate Lego constructions, designed bridges with matchsticks, and dreamed of creating buildings that would stand for centuries.

My parents encouraged this passion while ensuring I maintained regular Catholic practice, Sunday mass, evening prayers, and participation in parish youth groups.

I graduated from Polytechnico de Milano in 2001 with a degree in civil engineering specializing in seismic design.

My senior project was a revolutionary approach to earthquake resistant construction that earned recognition from the faculty and job offers from three major firms.

I felt I was destined for a career where I could solve real world problems through technical expertise and innovative thinking.

In 2003, I met Elena Rousini at a parish young adult retreat in the mountains outside Milan.

She was a pediatric nurse with a laugh that could light up any room and a heart dedicated to caring for sick children.

We fell in love over long conversations about faith, purpose, and our shared dream of building a family grounded in Catholic values and professional service.

We married in September 2005, and I felt I had designed the perfect life blueprint, successful engineering career, beautiful wife who shared my values, future children who would grow up with every advantage Elena and I could provide.

I had calculated everything carefully, planned every detail, anticipated every possible challenge.

What I hadn’t anticipated was that God’s architectural plans might be different from mine.

Elena and I spent the first years of our marriage establishing our careers and preparing for parenthood.

With the same methodical approach I brought to my engineering projects, we bought a house, established savings accounts, read parenting books, took prenatal classes.

When Elena became pregnant in 2014, I began designing the ultimate nursery, measuring everything perfectly, researching the safest cribs, creating an environment where our child would thrive.

The pregnancy progressed normally until the 20we ultrasound in June 2014.

I remember that appointment with devastating clarity.

I was reviewing construction blueprints for a new hospital when Elena called from her doctor’s office, crying so hard I could barely understand her words.

Franchesco, you need to come here now.

The doctor found something wrong with the baby spine.

I dropped everything and raced to the medical center, my engineering mind immediately shifting into problemsolving mode.

Whatever was wrong, we would find the best specialists, research the most advanced treatments, apply the same systematic approach that had solved every other challenge in our lives.

Dr.Maria Lombardi, the maternal fetal specialist, was gentle but direct as she explained the ultrasound findings..

and Mrs.Benadetti, your baby has spenida myelo maningo, a serious neural tube defect.

The spinal cord hasn’t formed properly which will cause significant disabilities.

I immediately began asking technical questions.

What surgical options existed? What were the success rates? Which hospitals had the most advanced technology? But Dr.

Lombardi’s answers challenged every assumption I had about problems having solutions.

Mr.Benadetti, I understand you want to fix this, but spinobipida isn’t something we can repair completely.

We can prevent further damage.

We can manage complications.

We can improve quality of life.

But your child will have permanent disabilities that will require lifelong care.

For the first time in my adult life, I encountered a problem that engineering couldn’t solve, that careful planning couldn’t prevent, that technical expertise couldn’t fix.

As we drove home that evening, Elena and I sat in silence.

Both of us trying to process a reality that didn’t fit any blueprint we had imagined.

The remaining months of pregnancy were filled with specialist appointments, surgical consultations, and preparation for a future we had never anticipated.

I researched spinobipida obsessively, learning about neural tube development, surgical interventions, assistive technologies.

I approached my son’s disability like an engineering project, convinced that if I gathered enough data and consulted enough experts, I could minimize the impact and maximize his potential.

Mateo was born on January 15th, 2015 at 3:20 a.m. at San Rafael Hospital, where my mother had worked for decades.

He weighed 3.

2 kg, had 10 fingers and 10 toes, and cried with the healthy lungs of any normal newborn.

But he also had a golf ball-sized protrusion on his lower spine where his neural tube had failed to close properly.

The first surgery happened when Matteo was 24 hours old.

Dr.Jeppe Merlo, the pediatric neurosurgeon, closed the spinal opening and inserted a shunt to manage the hydrophilis that had already begun developing.

Mr.Benedetti, Dr. Merlo explained, “This surgery will prevent further damage and infection, but it cannot reverse what has already occurred.

Mateo will have significant mobility limitations and likely some cognitive delays.

I spent those early days in the NICU, calculating probabilities, researching rehabilitation protocols, designing modifications for our home.

But Elena’s approach was different.

She held Mateo for hours, spoke to him constantly, and somehow seemed to love him just as completely as if he had been born without any complications.

Franchesco,” she said one evening as we sat beside his incubator.

“You’re treating Mateo like a problem to solve rather than a person to love.

” Her words stung because they were accurate.

My engineering mindset had immediately categorized Mateo’s disability as a technical challenge requiring systematic intervention.

But Elena saw what I was missing, that our son was first and foremost our beloved child, regardless of his limitations.

The first three years were a blur of medical appointments, surgeries, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy.

Mateo had surgery to implant a programmable shunt when he was 6 months old, underwent bladder reconstruction at 18 months, and received spinal rod insertion at age 2 to prevent progressive curvature.

Each medical intervention required weeks of recovery, and I documented everything with engineering precision, surgery dates, medication schedules, therapy progress, developmental milestones.

I created spreadsheets tracking Mateo’s improvement in fine motor skills, charts measuring his cognitive development, graphs analyzing his physical therapy gains.

But despite all my documentation and analysis, Mateo remained a profoundly unhappy child.

He cried constantly, seemed frustrated by his inability to move like other children, and by age three was asking questions that broke my heart.

Papa, why can’t I walk like the other kids? Why did God make me broken? I had no answers that satisfied either him or me.

As an engineer, I believed every problem had a cause, and every cause had a solution.

But Mateo’s disability seemed to exist without purpose, without meaning, without any positive outcome I could identify.

The social challenges were almost harder than the medical ones.

When we took Mateo to parks, other children would stare at his wheelchair and ask their parents why he couldn’t walk.

When we attended family gatherings, well-meaning relatives would offer suggestions about miracle cures they had heard about or ask when Mateo might get better.

By the time Mateo was 4 years old, I was experiencing what I later learned was caregiver depression.

I felt like a complete failure as a father, unable to protect my child from suffering, unable to provide the normal childhood I had always envisioned giving him.

I began working longer hours, accepting projects that required travel, finding excuses to avoid family activities where Mateo’s limitations would be highlighted.

Elena confronted me one evening after Mateo had gone to sleep.

Franchesco, you’re abandoning our son emotionally because you can’t fix him physically.

He needs his father to love him as he is, not to avoid him because he’s not what you planned.

She was right, but I didn’t know how to change.

Every time I looked at Mateo, I saw my failure as a protector, my inability to solve the most important problem my family had ever faced.

The guilt was consuming me from within.

In 2020, when Mateo was five, we enrolled him in a special education program at a local Catholic school that had excellent resources for children with disabilities.

Sister Franchesca, his teacher, was a remarkable woman who had dedicated her life to working with special needs children.

Mr.Benedeti, she told me during our first parent conference, Mateo is an exceptionally bright and sensitive child, but he’s carrying emotional weight that’s too heavy for a 5-year-old.

He feels responsible for his parents sadness, and that’s not a burden any child should bear.

Sister Franchesca’s observation forced me to confront an uncomfortable truth.

My grief and anger about Matteo’s disability was becoming an additional burden for him to carry.

Not only was he dealing with the physical challenges of Spinaipida, but he was also trying to manage his parents’ emotional struggle with his condition.

What do you suggest? I asked.

Love him for who he is, not who you wished he would be.

Celebrate his achievements without comparing them to typical children.

And perhaps most importantly, help him find meaning and purpose in his unique journey rather than focusing on what he cannot do.

Over the next two years, I tried to implement Sister Franchesca’s advice with mixed results.

I attended more of Matteo’s therapy sessions, participated in family activities regardless of accessibility challenges, and made efforts to focus on his strengths rather than his limitations.

But I still struggled with the fundamental question.

What was God’s purpose in allowing Mateo to suffer? By 2023, when Mateo was 8 years old, he had begun expressing darker thoughts that terrified Elena and me.

He would say things like, “Maybe I should just die and go to heaven where I won’t need this wheelchair.

” Or, “God must not love me very much if he made me this way.

” We immediately sought help from a child psychologist who specialized in disability related depression.

Dr.Anarici explained that children with disabilities often struggle with existential questions about purpose and worth, especially when they perceive that their limitations cause family stress.

Mateo is intellectually gifted but emotionally struggling.

Dr.Richi explained after several sessions with him.

He understands that his condition causes his family pain and he’s internalized that as being a burden rather than a blessing.

He needs to discover that his life has unique purpose and value that doesn’t depend on physical abilities.

How do we help him find that purpose? White Elena asked.

Sometimes children connect with role models who face similar challenges and found meaning in their struggles.

Are there any public figures or historical examples of people who transformed disability into mission? That’s when my brother pro mentioned Carlo Acutis.

Franchesco, this young man might be exactly what Mateo needs to hear about.

Carlo faced his own health challenges but found joy and purpose that transcended his suffering.

I was skeptical for all the reasons I had always been skeptical about religious solutions to practical problems.

But when I saw the despair in Matteo’s eyes growing deeper each day, I realized that my engineering approaches had reached their limits.

Maybe it was time to consider possibilities that my blueprints couldn’t contain.

In March 2024, when Mateo overheard Pro telling me about Carlo Akudis, something changed in my son’s demeanor that I hadn’t seen in years.

For the first time since early childhood, he showed genuine interest and enthusiasm about something beyond video games and therapy sessions.

Papa, can you tell me more about this Carlo? Did he really use computers like me? And was he sick, too? For the next several weeks, Matteo researched Carlo Acutis obsessively using his adaptive tablet, discovering that Carlo had been passionate about technology, had created websites about eucharistic miracles, but had also faced serious illness and early death.

It was as if Mateo had found the first person he could relate to who had dealt with physical limitations, but had also accomplished something meaningful.

“Papa,” Mateo said one evening as I was helping him with his nighttime routine.

“I want to go see Carlos tomb.

I think he might be able to explain to me why God makes some kids special like us.

The phrase special like us hit me like a physical blow.

For the first time, Matteo was identifying himself with someone he saw as special rather than broken.

Continue reading….
Next »