My son kept secrets from me.

Not many.

Not the kind that distance people.

The secrets of adolescent shame or private grief.

Carlo kept secrets the way certain people keep sacred things.

Not hidden, but held in reserve.

Waiting for the right moment.

Waiting for the person who needed them to be ready to receive them.

For 15 years, I watched him navigate the world with a quality of orientation that I attributed to his faith, to his intelligence, to the particular quality of attention he brought to everything.

He avoided situations that later turned out to be dangerous.

He was drawn to people who needed him at exactly the moments they needed him most.

He made decisions that seemed counterintuitive and turned out to be precisely right repeatedly with a consistency that I noticed and filed and never quite examined directly.

I should have asked him earlier.

I know that now.

On October 9th, 2006, 3 days before he died, Carlo finally told me why.

He had been communicating with his guardian angel everyday for 12 years.

Not poetically, not metaphorically.

in specific, practical, two-way conversation that had oriented his entire life in ways I had observed without understanding.

And before he left, he wanted to show me how.

What he told me in those hours left me trembling, not from fear, but from the specific sensation of a door opening in a wall you had always assumed was solid.

The sensation of understanding suddenly and completely something that had been in front of you for 15 years and that you had never had the language to see.

This is what was behind the door.

My name is Antonia Szano.

I am 63 years old and I am the mother of St.

Carlo Audis.

I want to begin with something Carlos said when he was 7 years old because it is where this story actually starts even though I did not know it at the time.

We were in the apartment in Milan late afternoon and he had been looking for a book, one of the reference books he used for his early research projects, which even at 7 had a quality of focus unusual for his age.

He found it on a shelf where it clearly did not belong.

He came to show me, holding the book with the expression of mild satisfaction he had when something worked as expected.

My angel helped me find it, he said.

I smiled.

I said something affectionate and moved on to whatever I had been doing.

I categorized the remark in the section of my mind reserved for the charming spiritual expressions of devout children, the kind that you receive with warmth and do not interrogate.

because interrogating them seems like putting unnecessary weight on something light and beautiful.

I made this mistake for eight more years.

Carlo was born on May 3rd, 1991 in London.

He grew up in Milan in the apartment where Andrea and I had made our life in the city that shaped him.

Its churches and streets and particular quality of light in the early morning when he walked to mass before anyone else in the building was awake.

He was our only child and he was from the beginning himself in a way that was complete and consistent and in some respects slightly mysterious.

He was joyful.

He was direct.

He was deeply practical in his approach to everything including his faith.

He wanted evidence, documentation, the thing that could be pointed to.

He spent his adolescence cataloging eucharistic miracles precisely because he understood that the miraculous did not retreat from scrutiny.

He loved technology, animals, video games, the specific pleasure of a system that worked as designed.

He also every day of his life from his earliest childhood spoke with someone I could not see.

I observed this.

I did not examine it.

I assumed it was prayer, the interior life of a unusually devout child expressing itself in the personal, intimate way that such lives sometimes do.

I assumed the angel references were figures of speech, the language of a faith that was deeper than mine, and therefore more comfortable with the poetic.

I was wrong, and Carlo, 3 days before he died, sat me down and corrected me.

Before I tell you what Carlo revealed on October 9th, I need to tell you about the 18 years between that conversation and now.

Not all of it.

Just enough to explain why I am telling you this story today on the feast of the archangels and not years earlier.

When Carlo died, I entered a period of grief that had a specific quality I have since tried to describe to others and have never fully captured.

It was not the grief of someone who has lost something unexpectedly.

Carlo’s death was expected in the sense that we had nine days of diagnosis before he left and he was not surprised by what was happening and his lack of surprise was in retrospect one of the most significant things I observed.

He moved through those nine days with a clarity and a peace that was not resignation.

It was familiarity as if he had known this was coming for a long time and had spent the intervening years being ready.

After he died, I held what he had told me on October 9th with the careful attention of someone who has been given something important that they do not yet know how to use.

I tried occasionally and without great confidence to apply the methods he had described.

I paid attention to the silence after morning prayer.

I noted coincidences.

I examined my dreams.

I found for years nothing I could confidently attribute to anything beyond my own thoughts and my own grief and my own considerable desire to find something I was not certain was there.

This is the honest truth.

I am not going to tell you that I became immediately fluent in the language Carlo had described.

I did not.

I remained for most of the 18 years after his death someone who believed what he had told me without being able to confirm it through personal experience.

What I could confirm was the pattern I had observed in Carlo’s life and that I now watched for with new attention in the lives of people around me.

The specific quality of practical orientation that belongs to people who seem to be receiving guidance from somewhere beyond their own analysis.

The decisions that should not have worked and did.

The presences that arrived at exactly the right moment.

The avoidances whose logic only became visible after the fact.

I saw this in people I knew repeatedly in ways that aligned with what Carlo had described.

I saw it most clearly in people whose prayer lives included specific consistent attention to their guardian angel, not as a poetic figure, but as a practical companion.

And on September 29th, 2024, exactly 18 years after Carlo first began preparing me for what he would tell me, three things happened on the same day that ended my uncertainty.

I will tell you what those things were.

But first, let me tell you what Carlo told me in the hospital room on October 9th, 2006, while I sat beside him in the particular stillness of rooms where time has been compressed into something more precious than its ordinary form.

This was unusual.

The door of his hospital room was almost always open.

The nurses came and went.

Andrea moved between the room and the corridor.

There was a constant gentle traffic that Carlo had always seemed comfortable with.

Asking me to close the door meant he wanted privacy and Carlo asking for privacy was enough to make me pay complete attention.

I closed the door.

I came and sat in the chair beside his bed.

The chair I had occupied for 4 days and would occupy for three more.

The chair that had become a kind of second home in the way hospital chairs do when you are keeping vigil.

I took his hand, which was warm in the way he had always been warm, and I waited.

He looked at me for a moment with that expression, the expression I had loved and puzzled over his entire life, the one that seemed to be looking at something slightly beyond whatever was immediately in front of him.

I had always assumed this was the quality of a contemplative mind, someone whose attention was partly interior.

I now know it was something else.

Mama, he said, I want to tell you about Gabriel.

I asked who Gabriel was.

My guardian angel, he said.

We have been talking every day since I was 3 years old.

His name is Gabriel.

I don’t mean the archangel.

I mean my specific guardian who was given that name.

I have never told you this directly because he paused and the pause had the quality of someone choosing words carefully because I was not sure you were ready to hear it as I mean it not as poetry as fact.

I sat with this for a moment.

Tell me as fact.

I said he did.

If you have ever sensed something in the quiet after prayer, a thought arriving with a quality slightly different from your ordinary thoughts, a direction that came without you having reasoned your way to it, and wondered whether that was your own mind or something else, this story is for you.

Carlos spent 15 years learning to distinguish between those two things.

And what he told me on October 9th is a framework that changed the way I pray.

If you want to begin developing what Carlo developed, the specific attention, the daily practice, the three methods he described, 7 days with Carlo includes his actual morning angel prayer, his examination practice for distinguishing interior guidance, and the specific way he asked his guardian for orientation on concrete decisions.

It’s in the description below.

I’ll say more about it later.

For now, let me tell you what he said.

I want to explain how it works.

Carlos said, “Because I think Catholics are taught about guardian angels as a doctrine but not as a practice.

We learn that they exist.

We are not taught how to actually work with them.

” He shifted slightly, finding his position.

[clears throat] There are three methods, he said, three ways that the communication happens and they work differently for different people.

Some people are more naturally attuned to one than the others.

You will discover which one is yours through practice.

He held up one finger.

First method, direct question and interior response.

You ask a specific question, not a general request for guidance, but a concrete particular question about a real decision you are facing.

Then you become quiet, genuinely quiet.

And you notice the first response that arises in the silence, not the second or third thought, the first one before your reasoning mind begins to process and revise.

How do you distinguish that from your own intuition? I asked by its quality, he said.

Your own intuition carries your fingerprints, your fears, your preferences, your history.

It tends to direct you toward what you already want or away from what you already fear.

The angel’s response has a different quality.

It is quieter, more neutral, and it is often unexpected.

It suggests something you would not have thought of or confirms something you were resisting or redirects attention to an aspect of the situation you had not considered.

He paused.

It also has a specific piece attached to it.

Not the peace of getting the answer you wanted, the peace of receiving true orientation which feels settled even when the direction is difficult.

He raised a second finger.

Second method, observing providential coincidences.

When you have asked for guidance and then gone about your day, pay attention to what arrives.

Not everything that arrives is angelic.

Most of what happens is simply life.

But there is a category of coincidence that has a specific character.

It addresses precisely the question you asked.

It arrives through a channel you would not have predicted.

And it does so with a timing that is difficult to attribute to chance.

How do you not become someone who sees meaning in everything? I asked.

This was a practical concern.

The person who interprets every coincidence as a divine message can lose the ability to think clearly.

Carlos smiled.

By applying the same test you apply to the interior response, does it increase faith, hope, charity, and peace? Does it align with Catholic teaching? Does it direct you toward love of God and neighbor or away from it? Angels, mama, are not cryptic.

They are not trying to be mysterious.

They are practical beings with specific assignments, and their guidance tends to be clear and actionable and oriented toward your actual good.

If a coincidence produces confusion or pride or fear or suggests something contrary to what the church teaches, that is not the angel.

He raised a third finger.

Third method, attention to dreams.

This is the least reliable of the three and requires the most discernment because dreams are generated partly by the mind and can be difficult to interpret.

But there is a category of dream that is different in quality from ordinary dreaming.

Clearer, more coherent, leaving a specific impression that persists on waking.

When these dreams contain practical guidance, specific warnings, or clear direction, they are worth paying attention to.

How do you know when a dream is from the angel and when it is just a dream? By the persistence of it.

He said, “A dream worth examining does not dissolve when you try to recall it.

It stays.

It comes back to mind during the day with a clarity that ordinary dreams do not retain.

And it tends to be simple, not the elaborate symbol laden narrative of ordinary dreaming, but a clear image, a clear directive, a clear impression.

” He settled back.

These are the methods.

None of them require special gifts.

They require attention.

The specific, quiet, consistent attention of someone who has decided to take the presence of their guardian angel seriously as a practical reality rather than a theological statement.

There are rules, Carlos said, that I want to be very clear about because what I am describing, opening yourself to spiritual communication, carries real risks if done without safeguards.

He was serious in a way that had nothing performative about it.

The first rule, always begin with protection.

Before any attempt to receive guidance through the methods I described, ask St.

Michael the Archangel for protection, not as a ritual formality, as a genuine request from a spirit that understands the nature of spiritual communication and has authority over what can and cannot approach you.

The prayer does not need to be long.

It needs to be sincere.

Why is this necessary? Because the spiritual world is not uniformly safe, he said plainly.

There are presences whose goal is to deceive and deception that comes dressed as spiritual guidance is among the most effective deceptions available.

The safeguard of invoking St.

Michael is not superstition.

[clears throat] It is the practical use of a real spiritual authority that God has provided precisely for this purpose.

He continued, “The second rule, never seek information about other people without their explicit or implicit consent.

Your guardian angel is assigned to you, not to everyone you know.

” Asking your angel about the private lives or decisions of others without their knowledge is a misuse of the relationship and tends to produce unreliable responses.

Keep the communication personal and keep it focused on your own life and decisions.

The third rule, and this is the most important one, mama, test everything against church teaching.

Every interior response, every coincidence you are considering as guidance, every dream impression, ask whether it directs you toward greater love of God and neighbor, whether it aligns with what Jesus taught, whether it is something a holy person would confirm as good and true.

He met my eyes directly.

Guardian angels never contradict the church.

They never suggest actions that harm others.

They never produce the fruits of pride, fear, confusion, or spiritual pride.

They never tell you that you are special or superior to others.

They orient you practically, quietly, consistently toward love, service, prayer, and the specific good God has designed for your life.

If any communication through any of the three methods produces the opposite of these fruits, if it makes you feel chosen in a way that separates you from others, if it suggests something the church would not confirm, if it leads toward spiritual pride rather than humility, it is not your angel.

He was quiet for a moment.

This is not meant to frighten you.

The vast majority of what people receive through genuine safeguarded attention to their guardian angel is simply quiet practical orientation.

The sense of a presence that is accompanying you and occasionally redirecting you when you are about to make an error.

It is not dramatic.

It is not spectacular.

It is the steady, patient companionship of a being whose entire purpose is your ultimate good.

After he had explained the methods and the rules, Carlo told me something about his own experience that I have thought about many times in the 18 years since.

Gabriel has been with me since before I was born.

He said he was assigned to me before I arrived in this world and his assignment ends when I leave it.

Everything that has happened in my life, he has been present for all of it.

He knows me completely.

Not just my actions, my interior life, my struggles.

The things I have never said aloud to anyone.

He paused.

There is a specific comfort in being fully known and fully accompanied that I cannot describe to you in a way that will fully convey it.

You know it partly through human love, the way you know me, the way I know you.

But the guardian’s knowledge is more complete, more constant, and entirely without judgment.

He told you about your death? I asked.

I had been wanting to ask this since he first mentioned Gabriel.

Carlo was quiet for a moment.

He prepared me for it.

He said carefully.

Not in a single conversation.

over years.

He helped me understand that a life’s meaning is not measured by its length.

That the work I was given to do could be done in 15 years.

That what I would leave behind would continue beyond me in ways I would not be able to see from here.

But that he could see clearly.

Were you frightened? When I was young, yes, he said honestly.

The first time I understood clearly what was being communicated, I was perhaps 10.

I was frightened.

Gabriel stayed with that.

He did not rush me through the fear or tell me it was irrational.

He sat with me in it and helped me find the questions underneath it and answer those questions one by one until the fear had nothing left to stand on.

He looked at me.

By the time the illness came, I was not afraid.

Not because I had suppressed the fear, because it had genuinely been resolved.

The work of those years of conversation had been partly preparing me for this.

I sat with this.

My son from the age of 10 had been having conversations that prepared him for what we were sitting inside now and I had been in the same apartment for those years available and he had protected me from it.

Why didn’t you tell me? He squeezed my hand.

Because you would have tried to fix it, he said gently.

You would have taken me to specialists and searched for reassurances and done everything a good mother does when something threatens her child.

And that love would have made it harder for me to accept what needed to be accepted.

He looked at me with those eyes.

Continue reading….
Next »