Berlin, spring of 1943.

A woodpanled office at the Heris Fafen, the German Army Weapons Office.

On the desk, lying like a dead snake on a layer of dust and torn shipping paper, sits a piece of equipment that should not exist.

5 ft of stamped steel pipe, a wooden shoulder stock, two flashlight batteries wired into a crude trigger.

It looks to the German engineer staring at it like something a teenager might assemble in a barn over a weekend.

He has been told this object came out of the Tunisian desert.

He has been told American infantry carried it into combat.

He has been told it can punch through the frontal armor of a Panzer 4.

He does not believe any of this.

The German engineer has spent 15 years of his career designing weapons of obsessive precision.

milled steel, hand fitted optics, tolerances measured in fractions of a millimeter.

The Vermacht’s anti-tank doctrine is built around towed guns weighing hundreds of kilograms, crewed by trained specialists, requiring minutes to set up, and a calculus textbook to operate.

And here on his desk is a thing that looks like a piece of plumbing.

He picks it up.

He turns it over in his hands.

He calls in his colleagues.

They are going to take this absurd object out to the test range.

They are going to fire it at a captured French tank and then they are going to write a report explaining to the high command why the Americans have wasted so much steel on a children’s toy.

By sundown that engineer will have written a different report, a report so urgent it bypasses three layers of bureaucracy and lands on the desk of the chief of the Hisvan the next morning.

A report containing words that when they reach Albert Spear’s ministry will trigger one of the fastest reverse engineering programs in the entire German war effort.

Words that will within 9 months put a copy of this absurd American pipe into the hands of nearly every German infantry company on the Eastern Front.

A copy that will eventually be built.

And this is one of those facts of history that sounds like a joke until you check the documents twice.

inside a small Bavarian shoe factory whose owners would after the war found two of the most famous athletic brands on planet Earth.

The German officer who picked up the bazooka in spring 1943 was looking at a weapon his side had no doctrinal answer to.

He could have written it off.

He could have buried the report in a filing cabinet.

He didn’t.

And the words he wrote, the technical assessment that German archives still preserve, they shocked his superiors so completely that the Vermach did something it almost never did.

It admitted in writing that an enemy weapon was better than anything the Reich had.

to understand how the piece of stamped pipe built by a junior lieutenant out of scrap metal ended up rewriting German anti-tank doctrine in the middle of the most ideologically arrogant war in human history.

We have to go back not to Tunisia, not to Aberdine proving ground.

We have to go back to a man walking past a scrap heap in Maryland in May of 1942, looking at a piece of garbage that nobody else in the United States Army thought was worth picking up.

Part one.

The man’s name was Edward Ole, 24 years old, lieutenant in the Ordinance Corps, engineering physics degree from Lehi University, fresh enough that he’d married his college sweetheart only the previous year.

By the standards of any pre-war American military, he was nobody.

He’d been in uniform less than a year.

He had no combat experience.

He had no patents to his name.

He had no influence inside the Byzantine politics of the army’s weapons procurement system.

What Ul had was an assignment that nobody else wanted.

Sometime in early 1942, he’d been pulled into a tiny office at the Ordinance Corps headquarters in Washington and told that he was now half of the United States Army’s entire rocket research program.

The other half was a man named Lesie Skinner.

Skinner was older, a West Point graduate from the class of 1924, an army officer who had been quietly fascinated by rockets since he was a child.

As a teenager in 1915, Skinner had set fire to the roof of a hospital at Fort Strong, Massachusetts, while experimenting with homemade rocket motors.

His father, an army surgeon, had not been amused.

The hobby was forbidden.

Skinner had nodded politely and never stopped.

By 1942, Skinner was a major, and he’d been handed a problem that the entire Western world was struggling to solve.

German tanks were getting heavier.

The Panzer 3 had sent a manageable nuisance.

The Panzer 4 was a serious threat.

The intelligence reports coming back from North Africa hinted at something even worse on the horizon.

A heavier vehicle, a longer gun, armor that nothing in the American infantrymen’s kit could touch.

The standard issue anti-tank weapon for the US infantry was a rifle grenade that bounced off German armor like a tossed pebble.

The Browning Point50 caliber machine gun could not penetrate the side of a Panzer 4 at any reasonable range.

Towed anti-tank guns existed, but they were heavy, immobile, and required a crew of four men plus a vehicle to drag them around the battlefield.

What the American infantrymen needed, what the Soviets and the British also needed desperately, was a way for a single man on his own two feet to destroy a tank, to stop being prey.

The problem had two parts.

The first part was the warhead.

By 1942, military scientists understood the principle of the shape charge, a hollow cone of explosive that when detonated, focused its blast into a thin jet of superheated metal capable of cutting through armor like a blowtorrch through wax.

The Swiss inventor Henry Hans Mohalped had demonstrated the principle.

American engineers had developed it into a usable grenade, designated the M10 that could in theory penetrate the 4 in of steel plate that German tanks were carrying.

The catch was that the M10 weighed nearly 4 lb.

You could not throw it.

You could not fire it from a rifle.

The only way to deliver it to a tank was for a soldier to physically run up to the vehicle, climb on top of it, and place the grenade by hand.

This was, to put it mildly, not a sustainable career path.

The US Army had a perfect anti-tank warhead and absolutely no way to get it to the target without converting the operator into a casualty.

That was the puzzle Skinner handed to Edward Ool in early 1942.

Find a way to deliver the M10 grenade to a tank from a safe distance.

Use rockets if you have to.

Use anything you have to.

Just solve it.

OOL tried for weeks.

The fundamental problem was the rocket exhaust.

Any small rocket capable of carrying a 4-PB warhead produced a back blast hot enough to incinerate the man holding it.

Early prototypes required the operator to wear a welding mask just to avoid losing his face.

This was not a viable infantry weapon.

It was a way to kill American soldiers slightly more efficiently than the Germans could.

Then came the moment Ool told and retold for the rest of his life.

though he himself, in his more honest moments, admitted that it had probably been more gradual and less cinematic than the version he eventually settled on.

He was walking past a scrap pile somewhere on a military base in Maryland in the spring of 1942.

Lying in the pile was a length of steel pipe about 5t long, about 60 mm in diameter, the same diameter, O realized while standing there staring at the garbage as the grenade he’d been trying to launch.

The idea hit him in a single sentence.

Put the rocket inside the pipe.

Let the pipe contain and direct the back blast away from the operator.

Mount the pipe on a soldier’s shoulder.

Aim it.

Fire it.

The rocket would burn out before it left the front of the tube.

The back blast would exit harmlessly behind the man.

The operator would not need a welding mask.

He would not need to be 10 m away.

He would only need a steady hand and the courage to wait until the tank was within killing range.

Ul picked up the pipe and walked back to the workshop.

Within days, he and Skinner had a working prototype.

Within weeks, they had test fired it into the PTOAC River.

And in May of 1942, they brought it to Aberdine Proving Ground in Maryland for what was supposed to be a routine evaluation of competing anti-tank weapons.

The army was testing five different models of spigot mortar that day, each from a different manufacturer, each developed by teams with budgets and reputations and political connections.

Skinner and were not officially on the agenda.

They had simply shown up with their pipe and asked if they could shoot at the moving tank target after the official tests were finished that morning.

And this is one of the small absurdities of military history that historians sometimes refuse to believe.

They realized the launcher had no sights.

They had built the entire weapon and forgotten to put away to aim it.

Walked over to a closet, found a wire coat hanger, bent it with a broken nail, and welded it to the top of the tube.

That was the sighting system, a coat hanger.

They walked out to the firing line.

Each of the five spigot mortars fired at the moving tank target.

None of them hit.

The tank rolled across the range untouched, dust trailing behind it, the way it had rolled across every other test that morning.

Then Skinner and Ool stepped up with their plumbing pipe and their coat hanger.

They scored multiple hits on the moving tank.

Not one hit.

Multiple.

From a weapon they had built out of trash on a budget so small the army did not have a line item for it.

Among the senior officers watching that morning was Brigadier General Gladon M.

Barnes, the chief of research and engineering at the ordinance department.

Barnes walked over, asked about the device, picked it up, and asked Skinner if he could fire it himself.

Skinner, calculating the political angles in real time, said yes.

Barnes pulled the trigger.

He hit the tank on his first shot.

He looked at the device in his hands.

He turned to a colleague and said with an expression somewhere between amusement and astonishment, “It sure looks like Bob Burns bazooka.

” Bob Burns was a popular American radio comedian of the 1930s and 1940s, famous for performing with a homemade musical noise maker, a length of pipe fitted with a funnel that he called a bazooka.

The name, an old Dutch slang, meant loudmouth.

The nickname Barnes coined that morning at Aberdine attached itself to the weapon and never left it.

The official designation launcher rocket 2.

36 in anti-tank M1 would appear on requisition forms and training manuals and technical bulletins.

But to every American soldier who ever fired one, and to every German soldier who ever found one in the wreckage of a captured American position, it would always be the bazooka.

That day at Aberdine, the weapon went from a prototype nobody had heard of to an order for 5,000 units.

General Electric was given 30 days to deliver them.

They finished with 89 minutes to spare.

By June of 1942, the bazooka was in mass production.

By autumn of 1942, the first units were being shipped to the Soviet Union under lend lease, where Stalin’s commanders received them with quiet skepticism and then quiet enthusiasm.

By November of 1942, and this is where the story turns, the first crates of bazookas, packed and labeled and not really understood by anybody, arrived in North Africa for Operation Torch.

The men who would carry them into combat had received almost no training.

Some had never seen the weapon assembled.

The early M6 rocket was unreliable, prone to misfire, inaccurate at ranges over 50 m.

The bazooka was about to make its combat debut and the United States Army had no idea what was about to happen.

What was about to happen was a German intelligence coup so quiet, so understated that even today, most accounts of the war barely mention it.

Because while American soldiers were figuring out how to load the weapon under fire for the first time, some Vermock engineer on the other side of the line was about to find one of these abandoned tubes in the desert sand, and he was going to send it home.

Part two, November 8th, 1942.

The American convoys arrived off the coast of Morocco and Algeria in the middle of the night.

Operation Torch was the largest amphibious operation the United States had ever attempted.

It was also, in the brutally honest assessments of the men who organized it, a mess.

The landings were disorganized.

Paratroopers were dropped in the wrong locations.

Vichy French defenders fought harder than expected in some sectors and surrendered immediately in others.

American casualties on the beaches were higher than anyone in Washington had publicly admitted they would be.

And the bazooka, the weapon General Marshall had ordered into mass production with a snap of his fingers six months earlier, went into combat almost completely untested by the men carrying it.

On the night before the landings, General Dwight Eisenhower discovered, to his quiet horror, that none of the troops scheduled to go ashore had received any meaningful instruction in how to operate the bazooka.

The crates had arrived.

The launchers had been distributed.

The rockets had been packed into ammunition kits.

And nobody had bothered to teach the infantry how to load them, how to aim them, how to wait until the enemy tank was inside the effective range of 200 meters before pulling the trigger.

The American general visiting the Tunisian front in early 1943, trying to compile an honest afteraction report on the bazooka’s debut could not find a single soldier who could confirm that the weapon had actually stopped a German tank in combat.

There were hits.

There were near hits.

There were stories.

Some of them probably true.

Some of them probably the kind of battlefield mythology that grows up around any new weapon of German tank crews surrendering after being fired on by bazookas because they mistook the rockets for incoming 105 mm howitzer shells.

But the cold operational record of Operation Torch and the early Tunisian fighting was that the bazooka had been deployed in haste without training with unreliable ammunition and against an enemy who was vastly more experienced in armored combat than the men trying to kill him with 5 ft of stamped pipe.

What the bazooka did do in those first weeks was something nobody on the American side anticipated.

It got captured.

Several of the launchers, some intact, some damaged, some still loaded with unfired M6 rockets, fell into German hands during the early skirmishes between Raml’s Africa Corps and inexperienced American units.

The exact circumstances of the capture vary depending on which source you trust.

Some accounts say the first intact bazookas were taken at the Battle of Sidi Bozid in midFebruary 1943.

Others say they were picked up earlier in scattered engagements throughout late November and December of 1942 along with a hall of other American equipment that the retreating gis had abandoned in their hurry.

Still, other historians point out accurately that by late 1942 the Germans had already captured several bazookas on the Eastern Front where the Soviets had received them under lend lease and immediately deployed them against the Vermacht.

Both stories are probably true.

The bazookas reached German hands through two parallel routes almost simultaneously and the heriswaffen in Berlin was suddenly drowning in samples of an enemy weapon they had never expected to see.

What happened next is the part of the story that conventional histories rarely tell properly because the German reaction to the captured bazookas was not the dismissive contempt you might expect from the army that had conquered most of Europe.

The German reaction was something much rarer.

It was respect.

It was in some of the surviving documents something approaching alarm.

Picture the scene.

A German engineer at the Hiswafan in Berlin and the Army’s central weapons procurement office opens a wooden crate that has just arrived from North Africa.

Inside is one of the captured American bazookas packed in straw with a brief and hastily translated American field manual stuffed alongside it.

The engineer pulls the weapon out.

He looks at it.

He has spent his career working on precision machine towed anti-tank guns weighing 500 kg each, requiring trained crews and prepared firing positions and complex ballistic calculations.

And he is now holding a tube of stamped sheet metal that weighs less than 14 lbs that can be operated by one man with 2 hours of training and that according to the captured manual can defeat 65 mm of armor at 150 m.

He doesn’t believe it.

None of his colleagues believe it.

The first instinct of any professional confronted with an unprofessional looking solution is to assume that the unprofessional appearance reflects underlying incompetence.

The Germans took the bazooka out to a test range.

They loaded it carefully with the captured American rockets following the translated instructions.

They fired it at a captured Soviet tank, probably a T34, possibly a KV one.

The records are not entirely clear on this point.

The rocket flew exactly the way the American manual said it would.

It impacted exactly where the operator had aimed.

The shape charge warhead detonated against the armor of the target vehicle.

And the engineers walked over to look at the damage.

What they found made one of them.

We do not know his name with certainty.

The German archives that survived the war reference the test obliquely and the central report itself appears to have been destroyed in the chaos of 1945 write a memorandum that within days had reached the highest levels of the army weapons office.

The memorandum in the cautious bureaucratic pros typical of German military reports made several observations.

First, that the bazooka represented a fundamentally new approach to infantry anti-tank warfare, one that the Vermacht had not pursued and had no equivalent for.

Second, that the simplicity of construction was not, as initially assumed, evidence of crude American engineering, but was in fact a deliberate design choice that allowed mass production at extraordinary speed and low cost.

Third, that the weapon’s effectiveness against armor at infantry combat ranges was equivalent to or better than the German army’s existing towed light anti-tank guns, weapons that cost 20 times as much to produce and required 10 times as many men to operate.

And fourth, this was the line that, according to several secondhand accounts that have surfaced over the decades, electrified the men reading it.

The bazooka, in its current form, was not the ceiling of the design.

It was the floor.

The same principles applied to a larger warhead could produce a weapon capable of defeating any tank then in existence on any front.

The Americans had stumbled into a doctrine the Germans had not even considered, and they had done it with a tube from a scrap pile and a wire coat hanger.

The decision to copy and improve the bazooka was made within weeks of the test.

The official designation went through several iterations.

Initially, the project was given the code namerance, which translates roughly as harvest wreath, a deliberately innocuous title chosen to obscure the program’s purpose.

The eventual production weapon would be called the Rocket and Panzer Buka, the rocket anti-tank rifle, model 43, soon revised to model 54 with a bore diameter of 88 mm, nearly 50% larger than the American original.

The German design preserved the fundamental concept Ool and Skinner had pioneered.

A shoulder-fired rocket with a shaped charge warhead launched from an open tube that contained the back blast and scaled everything up.

Bigger rocket, bigger warhead, more penetration, more stopping power.

By the time the first production units rolled off the line in late 1943, the German weapon could defeat any Allied tank then in service from the side or the rear, and most of them from the front.

The German soldiers who received it gave it two names.

The official propaganda nickname was Panzer Shrek, tank terror or tank dread.

chosen to boost morale and to advertise the weapon’s effectiveness.

The unofficial frontline nickname was openar stovepipe chosen because the weapon when fired produced an enormous cloud of greasy black smoke that made the operator’s position impossible to conceal.

Both names stuck.

Both names told you something true about the weapon.

The propaganda was not entirely false.

The Panzer Shrek genuinely terrified Allied tank crews when it was deployed properly, but neither was the soldier slang.

The stovepipe was a death sentence for the man, holding it as often as it was a death sentence for the tank he was firing at.

And here is the dirty little detail about the German weapon program that almost nobody mentions.

The weapon Germany built in response to captured American bazookas.

The weapon that would in the right circumstances kill more Allied tank crewmen than almost any other infantry anti-tank system of the war was not built in some hardened underground armaments factory in the ruar.

It was built in significant numbers inside a small civilian shoe factory in the Bavarian town of Herzoganarak.

A factory owned by two brothers named Adolf and Rudolph Dassler.

A factory that only 8 years earlier had produced the track shoes that Jesse Owens wore at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin.

A factory that after the war would split into two companies whose names every person in the modern world would recognize.

Adidas and Puma.

But before we get to that, to the impossible historical irony of Olympic running shoes and German bazookas being built on the same factory floor by the same seamstresses, there is something I need to say.

Men like Edward U didn’t fight for medals.

They picked something up off a scrap pile and changed how an entire war was fought.

He came home.

He worked for an aerospace company.

He died in 2010 at 92 years old.

And most Americans have never heard his name.

Every like on this video is a small thing, but it keeps men like him a little more visible, a little longer, and that matters.

Part three.

The factory at Herzogan was not supposed to be making weapons.

It was supposed to be making shoes.

The Dazzler brothers had been making shoes there since 1924 when Adolf, known to friends as Adi, had started stitching the first pairs in his mother’s kitchen after returning from his service in the previous war.

By 1936, the company had grown into one of the most successful athletic shoe manufacturers in Europe.

The brothers had joined the Nazi party that year, partly out of conviction and partly out of business calculation, and Audi had taken on a role coordinating sports activities for the local Hitler Youth chapter.

In the same year, and this is one of those facts that sits in the historical record like a stone in the throat, the Dazzler factory provided track spikes to the American sprinter Jesse Owens, who used them to win four gold medals at the Berlin Olympics, humiliating the entire racial ideology of the regime that the Dlers had just sworn loyalty to.

By 1943, the facto’s purpose had changed completely.

Gerbles had declared total war earlier that year, and Hitler’s regime was scouring the German economy for any industrial capacity that could be redirected toward weapons production.

The Dazzler factory was small, but it had something the German war machine needed.

Workers who knew how to work with their hands, equipment that could be retoled, and a building outside the major Allied bombing target zones.

In the autumn of 1943, the factory was ordered to stop making shoes and start making panzer shreks.

The components, pre-stamp tubes, sights, blast shields, electrical firing assemblies, arrived by railroad freight car from a contractor in the nearby town of Vos.

Inside the Hersoggan rock plant, women who had been sewing leather shoe uppers two months earlier were now welding metal sights and protective shields onto rocket launcher tubes.

They had received perhaps a few days of crash training.

The product was simple enough that according to a former employee interviewed years later by the local historian Manfred Welker, even completely unskilled workers could assemble the weapons after a little practice.

They were not the only workers in the building.

The Dazzlers had also been assigned French prisoners of war, at least nine of them by some accounts, possibly more, who were forced to labor on the Panzer Shrek line under conditions that the post-war denification investigators would describe with careful neutrality.

And the surviving prisoners would describe with considerably less neutrality.

The men forced to build the weapon that Germany would use against Allied tanks in Normandy were in many cases Frenchmen captured during the fall of France in 1940 and held in German custody ever since.

The historical irony is too sharp to dwell on for long without flinching.

French prisoners assembling German copies of American weapons in the same factory that had once made shoes for an African-American Olympian.

There are corners of the Second World War that look, when you finally get close enough to see them clearly, less like a war and more like a hallucination.

But the Dastler factory was only one node in a much larger production network.

The main industrial center for panzer Shrek manufacturer was the Hassag works in Mosulvitz and Leipik Hugo Schneider Oxin Gazelchaft a company that before the war had made lamps and household metalware and that during the war became one of the Reich’s largest smallarms producers.

Hassog produced Panzer Shreks at a scale the Dasslers could not have matched on their best day.

The total production figures across all German manufacturers eventually reached somewhere between 290,000 and 315,000 launchers, depending on which postwar tally you trust, plus over 2 million rockets.

The German industrial base, even under the weight of strategic bombing and material shortages, was capable of producing this weapon in extraordinary quantities once the decision had been made.

And the decision had been made on the basis of one engineer’s test report written within weeks of opening that wooden crate from North Africa.

The Panzer Shrek that emerged from this production process was not technically speaking a copy of the bazooka.

The dimensions had been changed.

The caliber had been increased from 60 mm to 88, the same caliber as the famous 88 millimeter anti-aircraft gun that Germany had been using against tanks since the early years of the war, which simplified the warhead supply chain.

The rocket motor had been redesigned.

Unlike the American bazooka, where the rocket finished its burn while still inside the launch tube, the German rocket continued burning for nearly 2 m after leaving the muzzle.

This meant the operator needed protective equipment, a face mask and gloves at minimum.

Eventually, a poncho style protective garment.

And after February 1944, a metal blast shield mounted on the launcher itself.

The weight crept up.

The empty weapon came in around 20 lb.

The loaded rocket added another seven.

And the whole assembly was 164 cm long, over 5 ft, making it awkward to maneuver in the close quarters where infantry anti-tank work usually happened.

But the warhead, the warhead was the thing.

The German-shaped charge could penetrate up to 200 mm of rolled homogeneous steel armor at battlefield ranges, roughly 8 in.

There was no Allied tank in service in 1944 that could survive a hit from a Panzer Shrek rocket on its side or rear armor.

The Sherman could not.

The British Cromwell could not.

The Soviet T34 could not.

Even the Soviet IS-2 heavy tank with its frontal armor in excess of 120 mm was vulnerable to a flank shot from the German weapon.

The American bazooka, by contrast, could penetrate around 4 in of armor under ideal conditions.

less in practice and against late war German tanks like the Panther and the Tiger, it was effectively useless, except in carefully chosen rear aspect engagements at suicidally close range.

The German engineers who built the Panzer Shrek had taken everything that worked about the captured American design, kept it, scaled it up, and produced a weapon that was, by the cold metric of armor penetration per kilogram of weapon weight, significantly more lethal than the original.

They had improved on the bazooka in the same way the bazooka had improved on every previous infantry anti-tank weapon.

by understanding the principle, accepting the trade-offs, and building the next iteration with absolute commitment.

And here is the line that closes the loop on the German officers report.

After the war, when American ordinance officers got their hands on captured Panzer Shreks and conducted sidebyside comparison tests against the latest American M9 bazookas, an American corporal named Donald E.

Lewis wrote up his impressions for his commanding officers.

The Panzer Sher Shrek, Lewis told them in plain English, was far superior to the American bazooka.

He’d been so impressed by the German weapon, he said, that he could no longer in good conscience recommend the American version for continued use against German armor.

The US Army Ordinance Corps received reports like Lewis’s from multiple sources in late 1944 and early 1945.

They examined the captured panzer Shreks.

They compared the penetration figures.

They read the German technical documents that had survived.

And in October 1944, they began development on a new American rocket launcher with a bore diameter of 3 and 1/2 in 89 mm to compete with the German weapon their own invention had inspired.

That weapon would eventually be called the M20 Super Bazooka.

It would not enter service until after the war ended.

It would see its first combat in Korea in 1950.

The full circle of the story is almost too neat to believe.

American engineers invented the bazooka.

The Germans captured it, tested it, were shocked by what they found, and built a better version.

The Americans then captured the better German version, tested it, were shocked by what they found, and built a better version.

Still, each generation of the weapon was the child of the previous generation’s enemy.

the cold war era anti-tank rocket launchers that armed armies on every continent throughout the second half of the 20th century.

The Soviet RPG2 and RPG7, the Spanish Installaza M65, the Belgian Blindside, the American M20 and its descendants.

Every one of them traces its ancestry through a direct line back to that German engineer in Berlin in early 1943, looking down at a tube of American sheet metal, picking up his pen, and writing words his superiors had not expected to read.

What words exactly? What was actually in that report? The text itself, as I said, did not survive the war intact.

We know about it through the reactions it produced, through the speed with which the German copy program was approved, through the testimony of officers who saw it pass through their offices and remembered its tone.

The closest we can come to reconstructing the assessment is through the actions it triggered.

And the actions tell a story of an officer who walked into the test range expecting to dismiss an American toy and walked out understanding that the entire German anti-tank doctrine built around heavy towed guns and crews served weapons and trained specialists was about to become obsolete.

Not because the Americans had built a better gun, because the Americans had built a different kind of weapon.

And the difference was the thing that mattered was the German officer’s report.

the moment everything changed.

Not by itself, but the weapon it set in motion was about to walk onto the battlefield in the worst possible place at the worst possible time for the men who had to face it.

And the place was not the Eastern Front.

The place was a tangle of sunken roads and high earned hedge in northwestern France in the summer of 1944 where Allied tank crews were about to discover that the war had quietly changed underneath them while they were looking somewhere else.

Part four.

By June of 1944, the Panzer Shrek was reaching German infantry units in numbers that were starting to matter operationally.

Production had ramped up through the previous autumn and winter.

The training programs for what the Germans called panzery yog commandos, tank hunting detachments, had been refined through trial and bloody error on the eastern front where the early panzer shreks had been issued in small batches to antipartisan units and then scaled up as the design proved itself against Soviet armor.

By the time the Allied invasion of Normandy began on June 6th, the German divisions defending the French coast had panzer Shreks distributed at the company and platoon level throughout most of their infantry formations.

Not enough to dominate the battle, but enough to make every American tank crewman who survived the campaign remember the smoke trail of an incoming rocket for the rest of his life.

The Normandy hedro country, the Bage with its ancient earthen banks and dense vegetation creating a maze of small enclosed fields where visibility was measured in dozens of feet rather than hundreds was a perfect environment for the Panzer Shrek.

The American Sherman tanks crawling forward through that terrain were forced into predictable approaches.

The German anti-tank teams could lie concealed in the hedge themselves, sometimes in foxholes dug into the base of the bank, waiting for the lead vehicle of a column to reach a range of 40 or 50 m before emerging just long enough to fire one rocket and then disappearing back into the foliage.

At those ranges, against the side or rear armor of a Sherman, the Panzer Shrek did not have to be aimed precisely.

It only had to be aimed vaguely.

The shaped charge would do the rest.

American tank crewmen called the wreckage of vehicles destroyed by Panzer Shrek rockets purple hearts on tracks.

A grim reference to the fact that the men inside those tanks had received their medals postuously, often without enough remains for a proper burial.

The casualty figures are ugly when you start looking at them closely.

American armored divisions in the Normandy campaign suffered tank losses to infantry anti-tank weapons.

Panzer Shreks and the smaller disposable Panzer Foust at rates that nobody in pre-invasion planning had anticipated.

The Panzer Foust, a singleshot recoilless launcher that was even cheaper and simpler to produce than the Panzer Shrek, would eventually account for more total Allied tank kills by raw number simply because Germany produced over 6 million of them.

But the Panzer Shrek was the weapon that German infantry preferred when they had a choice.

It was reusable.

It was more accurate.

It had longer range.

And it had stopping power that the smaller weapon did not.

A single hit from a Panzer Shrek rocket could end a Sherman cruise war permanently, regardless of where on the vehicle it landed.

The most haunting accounts of what happened in those hedge come from the survivors.

There was a Canadian armored unit, the British Columbia Draons, fighting as part of the fifth Canadian Armored Division during the Italian campaign that ran into a German Panzer Shrek team in what one survivor described decades later as a Hornets’s Nest.

The Draons lost vehicle after vehicle in the space of minutes.

The rockets coming in from positions the crews could not locate.

The smoke from each launch giving away the German position only after another tank had already started burning.

The Allied response was to add improvised armor, sandbags piled on the front and sides of the vehicles, spare track links welded onto the hull, logs lashed to the turrets, anything that might add a few inches of standoff distance to dissipate the shaped charged jet before it reached the actual armor.

These improvisations were largely cosmetic.

Postwar testing confirmed that the improvised protection, while it made tank crews feel slightly safer, did almost nothing against an actual Panzer Shrek hit.

The shaped charge jet needed roughly a meter of empty air to substantially degrade, and no Sherman crew was going to weld a meter of empty space onto the side of their tank.

What the Allied tank crews did instead was develop tactics.

They learned to never enter a hedgero corridor without infantry support.

They learned to suppress every suspected firing position with machine gun fire before advancing.

They learned to recognize the distinctive smoke signature of a Panzer Shrek launch, and to react within seconds, backing the tank up, traversing the turret, hosing down the source of the smoke with a coaxial machine gun.

The counter measures worked sometimes.

The Panzer Shrek operators died in large numbers.

Their life expectancy in active combat in Normandy was measured in days.

The smoke that gave away their position made them targets for every American gunner within sight.

The German doctrine acknowledged this brutally, instructing operators to fire one shot and immediately relocate and to expect to be killed on the second or third engagement at the latest.

By March of 1945, with Germany collapsing on every front, there were some 92,000 Panzer Shreks in active service across the Vermacht.

The weapon had become, by sheer numerical presence, one of the most common infantry anti-tank tools on any front in any army.

And yet, as the German military historian Christian Hartman observed in a post-war assessment, the weapon had arrived too late to change the outcome of the war.

If large numbers of panzer shreks could have been deployed during the Russian campaign in 1941, Hartman wrote, “Moscow would have probably fallen.

” Think about that sentence for a moment.

A senior German historian, not a propagandist, not a wartime journalist, an academic writing in the cold light of post-war analysis, concluded that the weapon Germany had built by copying a captured American invention was so effective that deployed two years earlier.

It might have decided the entire war on the Eastern Front.

The bazooka, in other words, did not just inspire its German imitator.

The bazooka may have, by the simple chronology of its capture and reverse engineering, given Germany a weapon that arrived just barely too late to save the regime that built it.

If Edward Ul had not picked up that scrap pipe in Maryland in May 1942, the Panzer Shrek program might never have started.

If Operation Torch had not gone forward in November 1942 with untrained American soldiers carrying weapons they had never been taught to use, the Germans might never have captured an intact bazooka to copy.

The chain of historical accidents that produced the Panzer Shrek was long and improbable at every link.

And the German engineers report that made the program possible was written in early 1943, more than two years after the German invasion of the Soviet Union had already begun to bog down.

Two years too late to be decided.

Two years too late to save the men in the divisions that needed it most.

If your father or grandfather served in Normandy, in Italy, on any front of the European war, I would be honored to read their story in the com.

What unit? What did they remember about the German anti-tank? Firsthand details matter more than any official.

They deserve to be preserved by the people who carry them.

Part five, the verdict.

Let me bring you back to that German officer in the spring of 1943.

Back to the woodpaneled office at the Here is Vafanumpt.

Back to the moment when he picked up a piece of stamped American sheet metal and could not believe what he was holding.

We have walked the entire history that flowed out of that moment.

We have seen the bazooka invented by a young lieutenant with a coat hanger and a scrap pipe.

We have seen it captured in the Tunisian sand and on the Russian steps.

We have seen the Germans test it, copy it, scale it up, and turn it into a weapon that haunted Allied tank crews for the rest of the war.

We have seen the same factory that made Jesse Owen’s Olympic shoes turned into a bazooka assembly line worked by French prisoners.

And we have seen the final almost unbearable irony that the German copy was so effective that the Americans after the war had to rebuild their own weapon from the German design, completing a circle that had started in a Maryland scrap pile and ended on a Korean battlefield 5 years later.

The verdict, when you look at all of it together, is uncomfortable because the standard narrative of the Second World War wants the Allied weapons to be better than the Axis weapons.

The standard narrative wants American industrial genius to be matched with American technical superiority.

And it wants Nazi arrogance to be matched with Nazi technical failure.

The reality of the Bazooka and the Panzer Shrek does not fit this story.

The reality is that an American invention was captured by the enemy, improved by the enemy, and used against the people who invented it more effectively than the originals were ever used against anybody else.

The reality is that a German engineer sometime in early 1943 looked at an American weapon and wrote a report whose central message was, “This thing they have built is better than anything we have and we need to copy it immediately.

” The shocked words of that German officer were at their core an admission of failure.

Not a failure of German engineering.

German engineering was famously good, but a failure of German imagination.

The Vermacht had spent 15 years building its anti-tank doctrine around heavy precision weapons operated by highly trained specialists.

The Americans, working with a fraction of the budget and a tenth of the institutional history, had built something simpler, cheaper, and easier to use.

The German officer who held the captured bazooka in his hands understood in that moment that his army’s entire approach to one of the most critical battlefield problems of the war was wrong.

He understood that the future of infantry anti-tank combat was going to belong to whoever could put the most rocket launchers into the most hands the fastest.

And he understood that despite all the famous German technical brilliance, the Americans had figured this out first.

What he did with that understanding was the most professional thing any officer in any army could have done.

He wrote it down.

He told the truth.

He recommended that his superiors authorize an immediate copy program and refused to let pride get in the way of operational necessity.

The German officer whose name we do not know, whose report did not survive the burning archives of 1945 was in his small bureaucratic way one of the most consequential figures of the entire German war effort.

He gave Germany the Panzer Shrek.

He gave the Vermacht roughly two years of superior infantry anti-tank capability over the men who had originally invented the weapon.

And he did it by being honest about something that most people in his position would have lied about.

Edward Ul, the lieutenant who picked up the pipe from the scrap heap lived until 2010.

He died at the age of 92 in eastern Maryland, having spent his post-war career working on guided missile programs and eventually rising to become the president of Fairchild Industries, where he oversaw the development of the A10 Thunderbolt 2, an aircraft whose primary purpose was destroying tanks.

The man who invented the first effective shoulder fired anti-tank weapon in human history, ended his career building one of the most effective tank killing aircraft in human history.

The line of his life, from the scrap pile to the A-10, ran through every armored conflict of the 20th century.

He never received the kind of fame he probably deserved.

Most Americans, even today, could not pick his face out of a photograph.

General Eisenhower, when asked late in his life to name the four weapons that had been most crucial to Allied victory in the Second World War, listed the C47 transport plane, the jeep, the atomic bomb, and the bazooka.

Edward Ool’s name appeared nowhere in that list.

He preferred it that way.

When asked about his role in the bazooka’s development, he tended to deflect credit to Skinner, to Goddard, to the dozens of other engineers and machinists who had contributed pieces of the final design.

He never quite got over the fact that the Eureka moment when he told the story sounded too neat to be entirely true.

He admitted in interviews late in life that the actual process of figuring out the launcher had been gradual and confused and full of false starts, and that the version where he walked past a scrap heap and saw the pipe and had the idea in a single sentence was a story he had simplified for the benefit of journalists who wanted a clean narrative arc.

Leslie Skinner, the older officer who had been O’s partner in the original development, retired from the army in 1947 as a colonel and lived until 1978.

Like Ul, he received almost no public recognition for his role in the bazooka’s invention.

The men who fought the war with a weapon they had built mostly never knew their names.

The German officer who ordered the Panzer Shrek program almost certainly never knew them either.

The chain of cause and effect that connected those two American engineers to the German tank hunting teams in the hedge of Normandy ran through anonymous bureaucratic offices and unnamed test ranges and unmemorable engineering reports.

The story was never famous.

It was just true.

And what does it leave us with when all the history is laid out and the verdict is read? It leaves us with this.

Wars are not always won by the side with the best weapons.

They are sometimes won and sometimes lost by the side that is willing to learn from its enemies without flinching.

The German officer who held that captured bazooka in 1943 did the professional thing.

He admitted the American weapon was better.

He set in motion the program that produced the panzer Shrek.

He gave his army a weapon that would kill thousands of Allied tank crewmen in the 18 months that remained of the European War.

He was by every measure of military competence doing his job correctly.

The catch is that doing his job correctly was not enough.

The Panzer Shrek arrived too late.

The German army that could have used it to decisive effect in 1941 no longer existed by the time the weapon was ready in 1944.

The shocked words of that anonymous officer’s report had set the right machinery in motion.

But the machinery moved at the speed of bureaucracy and engineering and industrial production.

And by the time it had finished moving, the war was already lost.

The Panzer Shrek killed Allied tankers.

It did not save Germany.

The reverse engineering of the captured American weapon was a tactical victory inside a strategic defeat.

a perfect example of how a war can be won or lost long before the decisive weapons reach the men who need them.

There is a final quieter irony to the whole story.

The Dastler factory inherits rock where French prisoners welded sights onto Panzer Shrek tubes throughout 1944 was eventually liberated by American troops in the spring of 1945.

According to the accounts that have come down through the surviving family members and the local historians, the American soldiers were preparing to destroy the factory as a former weapons production site when Ketta Dazzler, AI’s wife, walked out of the building and personally talked them out of it.

She told them charmingly and persuasively and not entirely truthfully that the factory had only ever made shoes and that the brothers had nothing to do with the war effort.

The Americans believed her.

They went away.

The factory survived.

After the war, the brothers split.

The company divided.

Ai founded Adidas and Rudy founded Puma.

And the Dazzler shoe empire became one of the great commercial success stories of the 20th century.

The Panzer Shreks they had built during the war and the French prisoners who had been forced to build them slid quietly out of the official corporate history.

The bazooka and the panzer Shrek both ended their service lives within a few years of the war’s end.

The American M20 super bazooka designed in response to the captured German weapon replaced both.

Continue reading….
Next »