In September 2024, a hiker ascending a remote ridge in Norway’s Hard Andrewa Plateau noticed something unusual protruding from a melting snow field at 1,800 m elevation.
What appeared to be corroded metal turned out to be the wing section of a German Junker’s Jew 88 bomber.
It’s lofted off a marking still faintly visible beneath eight decades of ice.
The aircraft had been frozen in place since 1943.
But what made this discovery extraordinary wasn’t just the preserved wreckage.
It was what investigators didn’t find inside.
According to military records, this plane should have contained the bodies of four crew members who disappeared after being shot down during a raid on Allied shipping convoys.
Yet, the cockpit and fuselov sections revealed only three sets of remains.
One man had somehow escaped the crash site alive in one of the most inhospitable environments on Earth and then vanished without a trace.
The question that would consume investigators.
Where did he go and how did he survive? If you want to discover what happened to the missing German airman who walked away from that frozen crash site in 1943, please hit that like button.
It helps us bring more forgotten stories like this to light.
And if you haven’t already, subscribe so you don’t miss our next investigation into the war’s unsolved mysteries.
Now, back to the mountains of Norway and a bombing mission that went catastrophically wrong.
The Hardand Dervida had kept its secret locked beneath advancing glaciers for 81 years.
By the autumn of 1943, Nazi Germany’s strategic position in Scandinavia had become increasingly precarious.
The marine surface fleet had suffered devastating losses in the Atlantic, forcing Hitler to rely heavily on yubot operating from Norwegian bases to interdict Allied supply convoys heading to Soviet ports.
To protect these submarine operations, the Luwaffa maintained a network of bomber squadrons along Norway’s western coast tasked with attacking merchant vessels and their Royal Navy escorts.
Camp Jeshuer 26 known as the Lion Squadron operated from Bardos airfield in northern Norway flying the versatile junker J88 a twin engine aircraft that served as both a level bomber and a reconnaissance platform.
The crew assigned the J88 a4work number 142386 on October 12th 1943 represented typical Luftwaffer personnel of that period.
Aubber Lutton and France Huber, the 28-year-old pilot, had flown 67 combat missions since 1941, earning the Iron Cross Secondass for actions over the North Sea.
His service record noted exceptional navigation skills and a calm demeanor under fire.
Unto Rafazir Klaus Brener, 24, served as the bombader navigator, a veteran of the Mediterranean theater who had transferred north after recovering from wounds sustained over Malta.
Feldwebble auto shriber the flight engineer and dorsal gunner at age 31 was the oldest crew member a career luwaffa technician with extensive experience maintaining due 88 systems the fourth position venture gunner was occupied by graphider Matias Vogle just 20 years old and on only his eighth operational mission the strategic objective for October 12th involved intercepting convoy RA54A which British intelligence had routed close to the Norwegian coast to reduce exposure to yubot wolfpacks operating in deeper Atlantic waters.
German reconnaissance flights had identified approximately 30 merchant vessels escorted by destroyers and corvettes presenting a high-v value target.
KG26 planned a coordinated strike using 14 G88s attacking in waves to overwhelm defensive fire.
The operation required aircraft to fly at wavetop height until reaching the convoy, then climb rapidly to 3,000 m for bombing runs, a profile that maximized surprise, but left crews vulnerable during the ascent phase.
Weather conditions on that October morning were marginal for operations.
Ground crews at Bartifas recorded temperatures of -4° C with broken cloud cover at 600 m and visibility restricted to 8 km by scattered snow squalls moving in from a barreny.
Wind speeds measured 35 km per hour from the northeast.
These conditions fell within operational parameters, though they complicated navigation and would prove particularly hazardous in the event of battle damage.
The J88’s flight characteristics remain stable in cold weather, but ice accumulation on wings could degrade performance rapidly, a concern noted in Huber’s pre-flight briefing documents.
The aircraft itself carried standard armament for anti-shipping missions.
Two 500 kg SC500 general purpose bombs in the internal bay designed to penetrate merchant vessel halls before detonation.
Defensive weaponry consisted of three 7.
92 millimeters MG81 machine guns.
One in the dorsal position manned by Shriber, one in the vententral position operated by Vogle, and one fixed forward firing weapon controlled by Huber.
The J88 also carried 2,400 L of fuel, sufficient for approximately 4 hours of flight time at crew settings.
Total takeoff weight reached 12,100 kg within normal limits, but leaving minimal margin for extended combat maneuvering.
The mission timeline began at 0847 hours when Huber received clearance for takeoff from Bardos Tower.
Radio logs preserved in German archives show routine communications during the first 43 minutes of flight as the formation proceeded southwest toward the Norwegian Sea.
At 0930, the lead aircraft reported visual contact with convoy RA 54A at bearing 247°.
Distance 22 km.
All aircraft descended to attack altitude, maintaining radio silence to avoid alerting British radar operators aboard the escort vessels.
at 0947.
As Hubers’s J88 began its climbing approach for the bombing run, Royal Navy records indicate that HMS Opportune, a destroyer escort, opened fire with its forward 40 mm Buffer’s guns.
Tracer fire from multiple escort vessels created a defensive curtain through which the German bombers had to fly.
Huber’s aircraft successfully released both bombs at 0949.
Neither scored hits, falling approximately 80 m short of the target freighter SS Empire Darwin.
But as the J88 banked hard to port to exit the engagement area, a burst of 40 mm shell struck the starboard engine as cell and wing route.
The damage proved catastrophic almost immediately.
Huber transmitted a brief distress call at 0951.
Schwabre starboard engine fire losing altitude heading for coast.
The transmission lasted only 6 seconds before cutting off.
Other crews in the formation reported seeing the stricken aircraft trailing heavy black smoke, descending rapidly but under apparent control.
One pilot, Linton Hinrich Krauss, later testified that he observed Huber attempting to maintain altitude by running the port engine at maximum power, but the drag from the destroyed starboard engine made level flight impossible.
By 0956, the J88 had descended to approximately 400 meters altitude and was crossing the Norwegian coastline near Harding Fjord.
German search and rescue coordination logs show that Bardiff control tower tracked the aircraft on radar until 1,03 hours when it disappeared from screens at a position roughly 40 km in length.
The last radar plot place a bomber at 300 m altitude.
Speed estimated at 220 km/h, slow enough to suggest Huber was attempting a controlled crash landing rather than ordering a bailout over the mountains.
Search efforts began within 2 hours.
The Luwaffa’s Catian airc rescue service.
dispatched two he 59 float planes to search the fur coastline while ground units from a wear mountain infantry battalion stationed at received orders to investigate reported sightings of a burning aircraft.
Weather deteriorated throughout the afternoon with heavy snow reducing visibility to near zero above 1,000 m elevation.
By evening, rescue coordinators acknowledged that any crew members surviving the crash would face extreme exposure conditions overnight with temperatures forecast to drop to -12° C.
The search continued for 5 days.
German reports indicate that reconnaissance flights covered approximately 800 square kilometers of mountainous terrain, but thick cloud cover prevented systematic visual searches above the tree line.
Ground patrols equipped with skis penetrated valleys radiating from the last known position, finding no wreckage, no parachutes, and no signals from emergency flares.
On October 17th, the Luwaffa formally suspended active rescue operations and reclassified the crew as missing in action, presumed dead.
The official Luwaffa casualty report filed on October 22nd, 1943 listed all four crew members as vermist missing with a notation that crash site location remained unknown despite extensive search efforts.
This administrative classification meant families received no confirmation of death, only the agonizing uncertainty that accompanies disappearance.
Huber’s wife, Greta, living in Cologne, received the standard We were wearmock telegram on October 20th.
Regret to inform your husband missing in action, Norway.
Further information when available.
The other three families received identical notifications.
By November 1943, Allied intelligence analysts had compiled information about the failed convoy raid from Royal Navy after action reports.
British records confirmed that one German aircraft had been shot down and tracked heading toward the Norwegian interior, but Royal Air Force reconnaissance flights over the area found no visible wreckage.
This absence puzzled analysts who expected that a burning aircraft would leave a distinctive scar on the landscape visible from the air for weeks.
The conclusion in British files suggested the J88 had likely crashed in a steep-sided valley or ravine where wreckage would be concealed from aerial observation.
Norwegian resistance fighters operating in the Hardand region during late 1943 reported no encounters with down German airmen or crash sites.
According to documents held in Oslo’s national archives, this network of operatives maintained constant surveillance of German military movements and regularly assisted Allied air crew who bailed out over occupied Norway.
The complete absence of reports about Huber’s crew suggested either that all four men died instantly in the crash, or that they came down in an area so remote that even experienced mountain guides never traversed it.
A contradictory account emerged in 1947 during Norwegian war crimes investigations.
A farmer named Olaf Bergerson testified that in mid-occtober 1943, he had encountered a German airman near the village of Idord, approximately 25 km from where the Jew 88’s last radar track placed it.
Bergerson claimed the man wore a luaf off a flight suit, spoke no Norwegian, and appeared to be suffering from severe frostbite on his hands and feet.
The airmen allegedly gestured toward the mountains, repeated the word camaraden comrades, and then departed before Bergerson could alert German occupation authorities.
This testimony went unverified as Bergerson could provide no physical evidence and died in 1951 before historians could conduct follow-up interviews.
German military archives preserved letters from the Cruz families, who continued seeking information for years after the war ended.
In 1952, Huber’s widow wrote to the newly formed Bundiswear requesting any additional documentation about her husband’s fate.
The response indicated that wartime records remained incomplete and that no new information about the missing aircraft had surfaced.
Klaus Brener’s mother made similar inquiries in 1956 and 1961, receiving identical replies.
The families formed an informal support network corresponding regularly and sharing the slim hope that some evidence might eventually emerge.
The official Luafa casualty report filed on October 22nd, 1943 listed all four crew members as vermis missing with a notation that crash site location remained unknown despite extensive search efforts.
This administrative classification meant families received no confirmation of death, only the agonizing uncertainty that accompanies disappearance.
Huber’s wife, Greta, living in Cologne, received the standard wear mock telegram on October 20th.
Regret to inform your husband missing in action, Norway.
Further information when available.
The other three families received identical notifications.
By November 1943, Allied intelligence analysts had compiled information about the failed convoy raid from Royal Navy afteraction reports.
British records confirmed that one German aircraft had been shot down and tracked heading toward the Norwegian interior, but Royal Air Force reconnaissance flights over the area found no visible wreckage.
This absence puzzled analysts who expected that a burning aircraft would leave a distinctive scar on the landscape visible from the air for weeks.
The conclusion in British files suggested the G88 had likely crashed in a steep-sided valley or ravine where wreckage would be concealed from aerial observation.
Norwegian resistance fighters operating in the Hardand region during late 1943 reported no encounters with down German airmen or crash sites.
According to documents held in Oslo’s National Archives, this network of operatives maintained constant surveillance of German military movements and regularly assisted Allied air crew who bailed out over occupied Norway.
The complete absence of reports about Huber’s crew suggested either that all four men died instantly in the crash or that they came down in an area so remote that even experienced mountain guides never traversed it.
A contradictory account emerged in 1947 during Norwegian war crimes investigations.
A farmer named Olaf Bergerson testified that in mid-occtober 1943, he had encountered a German airman near the village of Idjord approximately 25 km from where the Jew88’s last radar track placed it.
Bergerson claimed the man wore a Luwaffa flight suit, spoke no Norwegian, and appeared to be suffering from severe frostbite on his hands and feet.
The airmen allegedly gestured toward the mountains, repeated the word camaraden, comrades, and then departed before Bergerson could alert German occupation authorities.
This testimony went unverified as Bergerson could provide no physical evidence and died in 1951 before historians could conduct follow-up interviews.
German military archives preserved letters from Cruz families who continued seeking information for years after the war ended.
In 1952, Huber’s widow wrote to the newly formed Bundiswware requesting any additional documentation about her husband’s fate.
The response indicated that wartime records remained incomplete and that no new information about the missing aircraft had surfaced.
Klaus Brener’s mother made similar inquiries in 1956 and 1961, receiving identical replies.
The families formed an informal support network, corresponding regularly and sharing the slim hope that some evidence might eventually emerge.
Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, as Norway rebuilt and former battlefield sites became accessible to researchers, multiple expeditions searched for missing aircraft from war.
Aviation archaeologists documented crash sites across Scandinavia.
But the Hardander Vida Plateau remained largely unexplored due to its elevation and unpredictable weather.
The region’s glaciers had advanced during the 1940s and 1950s, potentially burying any wreckage that existed at high altitude.
Without specific coordinates, searching the plateau’s 8,000 km of alpine terrain proved impractical with the technology available during that era.
A renewed interest in the case emerged briefly in 1973 when German television produced a documentary series titled Vermist in Norwegian missing in Norway which featured Huber’s crew among dozens of unresolved cases.
The program prompted several Norwegian hikers to report possible debris sightings in remote areas, but investigations found only natural rock formations or remnants from pre-war mountaineering accents.
No credible leads emerged and the story faded from public attention once again.
The fall of the Berlin wall in 1989 and subsequent opening of East German archives provided new research opportunities for historians.
Documents from the former Luwaffa personnel office contained additional details about the October 12th mission, including transcripts of radio communications and post-mission debriefing reports from surviving crew members.
These files confirmed the basic facts already known, but added no information about where the aircraft had ultimately come to rest.
One previously classified document noted that a wear intelligence officer had investigated the Bergerson encounter in 1943, but found the farmer’s account unreliable and likely fabricated, leading to its dismissal.
Technological advances in the 1990s and 2000s made high altitude searches more feasible.
GPS navigation allowed precise mapping of search areas, while improved cold weather gear enabled longer expeditions into previously inaccessible terrain.
However, organized efforts to locate the J88 never materialized, primarily because no government agency considered the search a priority.
Unlike cases involving Allied personnel whose recovery remained an official military objective, German casualties from World War II received limited institutional support for recovery operations.
Family interest persisted through subsequent generations.
In 2008, France Huber’s grandson Thomas Huber, a school teacher living in Munich, began researching his grandfather’s disappearance using newly digitized Luftoer records.
Thomas established contact with Norwegian aviation historians and proposed a collaborative search effort, but funding proved impossible to secure.
He did succeed in obtaining detailed maps showing the aircraft’s last radar track, which he shared with mountaineering clubs operating in the harder region, hoping that recreational hikers might accidentally locate the wreckage.
Climate change provided the catalyst that decades of searching could not.
Between 2010 and 2024, average summer temperatures in southern Norway increased by 1.
8 degrees C, accelerating glacial melt across the Hardander Vida Plateau.
Snow fields that had existed for centuries began retreating, exposing rock surfaces and debris that had been frozen since before World War II.
Norwegian glaciologists documented this phenomenon extensively, noting that artifacts from the Stone Age and medieval periods were appearing at sites previously covered by permanent ice.
On September 8th, 2024, Andrew Christophersonen, a 34year-old geology PhD student from the University of Oslo, was conducting fieldwork measuring glacial recession rates at the eastern edge of the Hardander Vida Plateau.
His research focused on using newly exposed lykan growth patterns to calculate historical ice coverage at approximately 1,430 hours.
While photographing a recently uncovered rock face at GPS coordinate 60.
3847° north, 7.
5921° east, Christopherson noticed metallic debris scattered across a slope approximately 200 m from his position.
Approaching the site, Christopherson immediately recognized the characteristic construction of aircraft aluminum.
Thin sheets riveted in overlapping patterns distinctly different from modern materials.
The main piece protruded from a receding snow field at an angle of roughly 40°, measuring approximately 4 m in length.
Corrosion had created a distinctive green patina on the aluminum surface, but original gray paint remained visible in protected areas.
Most significantly, Christopherson identified a partially obscured Banroitz, the German military cross on what appeared to be a wing section.
Christopherson contacted the Norwegian Director for Cultural Heritage within 2 hours, providing photographs and precise coordinates.
The agency cross- referenced the location with historical records and quickly identified the wreckage as likely belonging to one of several German aircraft lost in the region during 1942 to 1943.
By September 10th, a recovery team from the Norwegian Armed Forces Joint Medical Services, which handles war grave investigations, had mobilized for a site assessment.
The team included archaeologist Dr.
Ingred Soulberg, forensic anthropologist Dr.
for Eric Johansson and three military recovery specialists trained in high altitude operations.
Initial examination on September 12th to 13th revealed far more extensive wreckage than first reported.
The receding snow field had exposed the aircraft’s entire port wing sections of Fuselov, both engine cells and the largely intact cockpit area.
The plane had clearly impacted the mountain slope at a relatively shallow angle, then slid approximately 150 m before coming to rest in what had been a permanent snow field.
Ice accumulation over subsequent decades had in tuned the wreckage, preserving it from the corrosive effects of weather exposure that typically destroys aircraft aluminum within 30 to 40 years.
Dr.
Soulberg’s team identified the aircraft as a Junker’s D88 based on distinctive structural elements.
the characteristic glazed nose section, the twin vertical stabilizers, and the BMW 801 radial engine configuration.
Serial number plates recovered from the port engine the cell provided the definitive identification.
Work number 142386 manufactured at the Junker’s factory in Desau in April 1943.
Cross-referencing the serial number with digitized Luftoer records confirmed this was Aubberlutin Fran’s Huber’s aircraft missing since October 12th, 1943.
The recovery operation expanded dramatically on September 15th when forensic examination of the cockpit area began.
Dr.
Johansson documented three sets of human remains.
One in the pilot seat, one in the navigator’s position directly behind the pilot, and one in the dorsal gunner station.
Preliminary assessment indicated that all three individuals had died either on impact or shortly thereafter from injuries sustained in the crash.
However, the vententral gunner’s position located in the aircraft’s belly accessed through a hatch between the cockpit and engine bay contained no remains whatsoever.
Forensic analysis of the remains proceeded according to protocols established by the Norwegian armed forces for World War II casualties.
Dr.
Johansson’s team carefully excavated each set of remains, documenting their positions with three-dimensional photoggramometry before removal.
The pilot, seated in a semi-relined position with hands still gripping the control column, had sustained massive trauma to the chest and had consistent with impact against the instrument panel.
Fragments of plexiglass embedded in the skull suggested the windscreen had shattered on impact.
Personal effects recovered included a leather wallet containing identification papers for Fran Huber, photographs of his family, and 47 Reich’s marks and currency.
The navigator’s remains found slumped forward against the back of the pilot seat, showed similar impact trauma.
Dental records, later confirmed this individual as Klouse Brener.
His navigator’s case, constructed of leather and remarkably well preserved by the cold, contained maps of the Norwegian coast.
A circular slide rule used for calculating bombing trajectories and a log book with entries up to October 11th, 1943.
The final entry read improving.
Convoy operations tomorrow.
Huber confident will score hits.
Otto Shriber’s remains in the dorsal gunner position revealed different trauma patterns.
Dr.
of Hansen determined that Shriber had sustained severe burns to his upper body before the crash, likely from the engine fire that caused the aircraft to go down.
Fragments of his leather flight jacket showed scorch marks and melted areas.
Additionally, Shriber’s right femur displayed a compound fracture that had occurred either during the initial combat damage or during the crash sequence.
This injury would have prevented him from evacuating the aircraft, even if he had survived the impact.
Metallergical analysis of the wreckage provided crucial insights into the crash sequence.
Dr.
Soulberg’s team examined the starboard engine to cell which showed extensive fire damage and multiple penetrations consistent with 40 mm cannon shells.
The engine’s crankase had fractured and fragments of connecting rods were found embedded in the cell’s internal structure.
Clear evidence of catastrophic mechanical failure at high RPM.
This corroborated Huber’s distress call about engine fire and explained why the aircraft couldn’t maintain altitude.
The port engine, by contrast, showed no fire damage, but exhibited signs of over temperature operation.
Exhaust valves were severely eroded, and the cylinder heads displayed stress cracks from prolonged maximum power settings.
This evidence painted a clear picture.
Huber had run the remaining engine beyond its operational limits, attempting to reach the coast or find suitable terrain for a force landing.
The engine had likely seized completely in the final moments before impact, eliminating any remaining control authority.
Most intriguing was the evidence found in the vententral gunner’s position.
The access hatch, which normally secured from inside the fuselage with a mechanical latch, stood completely open, a configuration impossible to achieve accidentally during flight or impact.
Tool marks on the hatch frame indicated someone had forced it open using a metal implement.
Likely the survival knife that Luffed off a cruise carried as standard equipment.
Inside the cramp compartment, investigators found the gunner’s parachute pack unopened and still secured to its mounting bracket.
A fleece lined leather flight jacket hung on a hook and the MG81 machine gun remained in its mount unfired.
Norwegian conservation specialists transported all artifacts to the armed forces aircraft collection facility at Garderone for detailed analysis.
One crucial discovery emerged during examination of the aircraft’s fuselof structure near the vententral position.
A series of scratches on the aluminum interior that under microscopic examination spelled out 15 to 100830 vogal OSD.
This had been scratched into the metal using a sharp implement likely a knife blade.
The message indicated a date October 15th 3 days after the crash.
a time 0830 hours, a name Vogle the vententral gunner and a direction O German for east.
Dr.
Soulberg consulted with handwriting experts who compared the scratched letters to samples of Matias Vogel’s handwriting obtained from his military service records.
While definitive matching proved impossible given the crude nature of scratching metal, the letter formations showed consistencies with Vogle’s documented writing style, particularly his characteristic method of forming the letter G.
This evidence combined with the absence of remains in the vententral position and the forced hatch led investigators to a remarkable conclusion.
Gerrider Matias Vogel had survived the crash and departed the wreckage under his own power 3 days later.
Forensic meteorologists reconstructed weather conditions for October 12th to 15th, 1943 using historical records from Norwegian weather stations.
The crash occurred during a clearing period between snow squalls with temperatures at 1,800 m elevation ranging from -8 to -14° C.
Wind speeds varied between 20 and 45 kmh creating windchill values equivalent to -25°.
These conditions, while severe, fell within the survivability range for someone with proper cold weather gear and shelter, both of which the aircraft fuselage would have provided.
The investigation team consulted with survival experts from the Norwegian Army’s winter warfare school.
Their analysis suggested Vogle likely spent the first 48 hours after the crash sheltering inside the fuselov using parachute silk as insulation and possibly burning hydraulic fluid or other aircraft materials for warmth.
The decision to depart on the third day rather than waiting for rescue indicated either that he recognized no search would reach their position or that he faced some immediate threat such as fuel leaking into the fuselov creating an explosion risk.
Combining physical evidence from the crash site with historical records and expert analysis.
Investigators reconstructed the final moments of J8 work number 142386 and the extraordinary survival story that followed.
When Royal Navy 40 mm fire disabled the starboard engine at 0949 hours on October 12th, 1943, France Huber faced the most critical decision of his flying career.
The immediate engine fire and loss of power gave him perhaps 90 seconds before the aircraft became unfiable.
His training and experience told him that attempting to reach Bardifos airfield, 160 km northeast, was impossible.
Bailing out over the Norwegian Sea would mean certain death in water temperatures of 4° C.
His only option involved making for the Norwegian coast and attempting a force landing.
Huber’s skill as a pilot becomes evident in the wreckage pattern.
Rather than allowing the aircraft to spin out of control, he maintains sufficient authority to cross the coastline at 400 m altitude and continue inland toward potentially survivable terrain.
The radar track showing the aircraft at 300 m and 220 kmh at 1,03 hours indicates controlled flight, not an uncontrollable descent.
Huber was searching for a landing site, a frozen lake, a snowcovered meadow, anywhere flat enough to put the aircraft down with some chance of crew survival.
The crash site location reveals what happened in the final seconds.
At 1,800 meters elevation, approaching from the southwest, Huber encountered a steep-sided mountain slope covered in deep snow.
Whether due to the port engine finally failing, loss of visibility in blowing snow, or simply running out of altitude and options, the J88 struck the slope at an angle of approximately 30°.
The impact speed estimated from wreckage dispersion patterns was between 180 and 200 kmh.
Fast enough to be catastrophic, but slower than an uncontrolled crash would have been.
The aircraft’s left wing struck first, absorbing tremendous force and causing the fuselov to yell violently to port.
This rotation actually reduced the direct impact force on the cockpit area, though not enough to prevent fatal injuries to Huber, Brener, and Shriber.
The aircraft then slid 150 m up the slope before embedding in what was then the lower edge of a permanent snow field.
The crash generated sufficient heat from friction and burning fuel to melt a depression in the snow which then refose around the wreckage, beginning the intunement process that would preserve it for 81 years.
Matias Vogel’s survival resulted from a combination of positioning and luck.
The vententral gunner’s compartment, located in the structural center of the fuselage and surrounded by the aircraft’s main fuel tanks, now mostly empty after combat and the subsequent flight, formed a naturally protected space.
When the wings and cockpit absorbed the impact forces, the center fuselav remained relatively intact.
Vogle likely sustained injuries.
No one walks away from such a crash unharmed, but nothing immediately fatal.
Evidence suggests Vogle regained consciousness within hours of the crash.
The first thing he would have noticed was the profound cold and the eerie silence after the violence of combat and impact.
Climbing through the fuselage to the cockpit, he would have discovered his three crew members dead, a sight that must have been psychologically devastating.
But Vogel was only 20 years old, and the survival instinct proved strong.
He retreated to the vententral gunner’s position, the least damaged area, and began the grim work of staying alive.
The 3 days Vogle spent in the wreckage can be reconstructed from physical evidence.
He would have had access to emergency rations, Luwaff aircraft carried chocolate, condensed milk, and hard attack biscuits sufficient for four men for 72 hours.
The leather flight jackets with uniforms and parachute silk from his dead crew members provided insulation materials.
Small fires using aircraft components could be maintained inside the metal fuselov which acted as a radiant heater.
Most critically, he had shelter from wind, which makes the difference between survival and death in extreme cold.
On October 15th, conditions improved.
Historical weather records show that morning dawn clear with light winds and temperatures rising to minus6 degrees C.
As good as conditions would get in that environment.
Vogle, perhaps recognizing that no rescue would come.
German search efforts had ceased 3 days earlier, made the decision to attempt escape on foot.
He scratched his message on the fuselage wall indicating his name, the time of departure, and his intended direction of travel, east, toward lower elevations, and the possibility of reaching human habitation.
What happened to Vogle after he departed the crash site remains uncertain, but investigators developed two primary theories based on available evidence.
The first theory supported by the 1947 testimony of farmer Ola Berguson suggests Vogle successfully descended approximately 1,000 vertical meters over 3 days covering 25 km through extremely difficult terrain before encountering Bergerson near ID around October 18th.
If this account is accurate, Vogle’s frostbite injuries would have been severe, potentially gangrous, and his mental state likely compromised by exhaustion and trauma.
Berguson’s description of the airman gesturing toward the mountains and repeating camerariden fits with someone suffering from exposure and guilt over leaving his crew.
The second theory considered more probable by Norwegian investigators holds that Vogle perished somewhere between the crash site and the tree line approximately 8 to 10 km east of where the Jew 88 came to rest.
This theory is supported by the extreme difficulty of descending the hardander alone, injured, and in October weather conditions.
Even experienced mountaineers with proper equipment consider such terrain dangerous.
A 20-year-old airman wearing flight boots unsuitable for hiking with minimal cold weather survival training and likely suffering from injuries, dehydration, and psychological trauma, faced nearly impossible odds.
His remains likely lie somewhere in that wilderness, either buried in a creasse, concealed beneath another receding snowfield or in a location so remote that they will never be found.
The Bergerson testimony remains problematic.
No physical evidence corroborated his account, no German uniform items, no wear mocked identity papers, no equipment that Vogle would have carried.
Bergerson waited 4 years to report the encounter, only mentioning it during war crimes investigations when many Norwegians were eager to prove their resistance credentials.
The Norwegian police, who investigated his statement in 1947, noted inconsistencies in his description of the airman’s uniform and equipment.
Most damning, the German military investigation in 1943, conducted when cooperation would have benefited Bergerson by ingratiating him with occupation authorities, concluded his story was fabricated.
What surprises investigators most is that Vogle came so close to beating impossible odds.
If he had remained with the aircraft for another week, a Luwaffa mountain unit conducting unrelated operations in the area documented in Wormach daily logs passed within 3 km of the crash site.
If he had departed one day earlier, weather conditions would have killed him within hours.
If he had chosen to travel west instead of east, he would have encountered insurmountable cliffs.
The margins between survival and death, between becoming a documented miracle and an eternal mystery, measured in such fine calculations.
The recovery of Jew 88 work number 142386 allowed three families to finally bury their dead.
Fran, Huber, Klaus Brener, and Otto Shriber were interoured with military honors at the German war cemetery in Kel on November 7th, 2024.
81 years after they died in the Norwegian mountains, their grandchildren attended the ceremony, providing a closure that the previous generation never received.
But the fourth grave, reserved for Matias Vogel, remains empty.
His fate, whether he lies somewhere on the harder or reached civilization before succumbing to his injuries, stays unresolved.
Another wartime mystery that may never be fully answered.
What this discovery reveals extends beyond individual tragedy.
It demonstrates how thoroughly war can erase evidence of its participants.
Even in the modern era of documentation and surveillance for men disappeared into a mountain wilderness and despite searches, despite records, despite testimony, it took eight decades and planetary climate change to reveal even part of their story.
Vogle’s desperate message scratched into aluminum.
His final communication to a world he might never reach again stands as testament to the human will to survive, to be remembered, and to matter.
Whether he succeeded in his escape or died trying, he deserves more than uncertainty.
The mountains may yet yield one final
