The morning of November 11th, 1943, Lieutenant Junior Grade Alex Vasu rolled his F6F Hellcat into a steep dive at 14,000 ft above Rabal Harbor.
Below him, nine Japanese Betty bombers were attempting to escape into cloud cover after striking American shipping near Empress Augusta Bay.
Vatu had never fired his guns in combat before.
This was his first mission with Fighting Squadron 6 aboard the carrier Independence.
What happened in the next 4 minutes would reveal something the Japanese high command had failed to understand about American fighter design.
A miscalculation that would cost them air superiority across the entire Pacific theater.
Vasio’s Hellcat carried six Browning M2 50 caliber machine guns, three mounted in each wing.
Each gun was loaded with 400 rounds.
Total ammunition capacity 2400 rounds.
total weight of fire per second when all six guns fired simultaneously.
Approximately 100 rounds, roughly 63 pounds of lead and incendiary projectiles delivered downrange every second.
The Japanese had no equivalent weapon system in any single engine fighter.
The Zero carried two 7.7 mm machine guns and two 20 mm cannons.
The cannons hit hard but carried only 60 rounds each, enough for perhaps 7 seconds of sustained fire.
The machine guns were rifle caliber, effective against unarmored targets, useless against American aircraft with armor plating and self-sealing fuel tanks.
The difference wasn’t just firepower.
It was philosophy.
Japanese designers had optimized for maneuverability and range.
They’d sacrificed armor, fuel tank protection, and heavy armorament to keep weight low.
American designers had made the opposite choice.
They’d built fighters that could absorb punishment and deliver devastating firepower.
The Hellcat weighed 9,200 lb empty.
A Zero weighed 3,700 lb.
That weight difference represented armor, self-sealing tanks, and guns.
Lots of guns.
Vasu dove through 7,000 ft, building speed past 300 mph.
The lead Betty filled his gun site.
He was closing from 7:00 high, a classic overhead run.
The Betty’s tail gunner saw him coming and opened fire with a single 7.7 mm machine gun.
Tracer rounds arked toward Vu’s Hellcat.
They looked dangerous, but most passed harmlessly wide.
The few that hit sparked off the Hellcat’s armored windscreen and engine cowing without penetrating.
Vasu held his dive.
He closed to 300 yd.
Still too far.
The Hellcat’s guns were harmonized to converge at 250 yd.
He needed to get closer.
At 250 yd, Vasu pressed the trigger.
All six guns erupted simultaneously.
The noise was overwhelming even inside the cockpit.
The Hellcat shuddered from the recoil.
spent casings ejected from the wing bays streaming behind the aircraft in a glittering trail.
The tracer pattern looked like a solid bar of light connecting VCU’s Hellcat to the Betty bomber.
The 50 caliber rounds walked up the Betty’s fuselage in less than 2 seconds.
They punched through the aluminum skin, shredded control cables, smashed through hydraulic lines, and detonated the bombers’s fuel tanks.
The Betty exploded in midair.
Pieces of wing and fuselage tumbled through the sky, trailing smoke and flame.
If you’re enjoying this deep dive into the story, hit the subscribe button and let us know in the comments from where in the world you are watching from today.
Vasu pulled up and searched for another target.
His wingman, Enen Homer Brockmire, had already shot down a second Betty.
The remaining seven bombers scattered, diving for the safety of cloud cover 8 mi to the south.
Vasu selected the nearest bomber and rolled into pursuit.
This Betty pilot was more experienced.
He threw his aircraft into a hard turn, trying to force Vasu into an overshoot, but the Hellcat had enough power to stay with the turn without losing position.
Vasu settled into firing range again.
He pressed the trigger.
Another sustained burst.
3 seconds, approximately 300 rounds.
The Betty’s right engine erupted in flames.
The bomber rolled inverted and fell toward the ocean, trailing black smoke.
Verasu was learning something important.
He didn’t need to aim perfectly.
He didn’t need to wait for the ideal deflection angle.
The Hellcats 6 50 caliber guns threw so much lead into the air that precision was almost unnecessary.
If the target was anywhere near the gunsite pipper, enough rounds would connect to cause catastrophic damage.
This was fundamentally different from the Zero’s armament philosophy.
A Zero pilot had to aim carefully because his 20 mm cannons had limited ammunition.
60 rounds per gun meant approximately 15 trigger pulls before the guns went dry.
Each burst had to count.
Wasted ammunition meant a defenseless aircraft.
But Vasu had 2400 rounds.
He could fire sustained bursts and still have plenty left.
What Vasu didn’t know was that Japanese pilots attacking American bombers had been encountering this same overwhelming firepower problem for months, except from the opposite direction.
They’d been attacking B17 flying fortresses and discovering that 10 to 13 50 caliber machine guns firing simultaneously created an almost impenetrable defensive sphere.
Zeros attempting frontal attacks on B17 seconds flew through walls of traces.
Most turned away.
The few who pressed their attacks usually died.
The 50 caliber rounds tore zeros apart.
Now the Japanese were facing the same problem from American fighters.
The F6F Hellcat had essentially mounted the firepower of a bomber’s defensive armament on a fighter airframe.
The psychological impact was immediate and devastating.
The third, Betty Vreu, attacked that morning, tried to evade by diving toward the water.
The pilot pushed the bomber into a steep descent, probably hoping Vasu would overshoot or break off.
Vasu followed.
He was still learning the Hellcat’s capabilities.
The dive was steep, past 400 mph.
The controls stiffened, but remained responsive.
The gun sight tracked smoothly.
Vasu fired from 300 yd.
The closure rate was high.
He held the trigger down for nearly 4 seconds.
The 50 caliber rounds stitched across the Betty’s left wing route.
The wing separated from the fuselage almost instantly.
The bomber cartwheeled into the ocean, throwing up a massive column of white water.
Vasio pulled out at 2,000 ft and climbed back to altitude.
He’d expended approximately 1,000 rounds.
He still had 1,400 rounds remaining, plenty for more engagements.
He destroyed three Betty bombers in 4 minutes.
This was his first combat mission.
He hadn’t needed exceptional accuracy.
He hadn’t needed perfect tactical positioning.
He’d simply put his gun sight on the target and pressed the trigger.
The Hellcat’s guns did the rest.
What made this possible was a series of engineering decisions made in Beth Page, New York during the summer of 1942 when Grumman engineers were finalizing the F6F design.
The original specification called for four 50 caliber guns matching the armament of the F4F Wildcat, but combat reports from the Pacific indicated that four guns weren’t enough.
Pilots wanted more firepower.
They wanted to destroy targets quickly with short bursts.
They wanted ammunition capacity that allowed multiple engagements without returning to the carrier.
The Bureau of Aeronautics authorized Grumman to test a six gun installation.
The challenge was fitting six guns and their ammunition into the Hellcat’s wing structure without compromising strength or adding excessive weight.
Each Browning M2 50 caliber machine gun weighed 64 lb empty.
Each belt of 400 rounds weighed approximately 120 lb loaded.
Six guns plus ammunition added over,00 lb to the aircraft.
That weight had to be distributed evenly across both wings to maintain proper balance.
The ammunition bays had to be accessible for loading and maintenance.
The guns had to be harmonized so their fire converged at a specific range.
The ejection ports had to be positioned so spent casings and belt links wouldn’t damage the aircraft.
Grumman’s engineers solved these problems by mounting three guns in each wing outboard of the landing gear bay.
The guns were staggered vertically to fit within the wing’s thickness.
The ammunition was fed from boxes mounted behind the guns.
spent casings ejected through ports on the wing’s lower surface.
The installation was elegant and effective.
It gave the Hellcat more firepower than any other single engine fighter in the world at that time.
The Japanese had no idea this was coming.
Intelligence reports from mid 1943 mentioned that American fighters were using increased armorament, but Japanese analysts assumed this meant improved versions of existing weapons.
They didn’t realize the Americans had doubled the number of guns.
The first indication came during the raid on Rabal on November 5th, 1943, 6 days before Vrau’s mission.
97 American carrier aircraft struck the Japanese naval base.
25 Hellcats provided fighter cover.
They encountered approximately 70 Japanese aircraft, mostly zeros and land-based fighters.
The Hellcats shot down 17 Japanese aircraft and damaged at least 20 more.
Only one Hellcat was lost.
Japanese pilots who survived the engagement reported that American fighters were firing with unexpected intensity.
The volume of tracers was far greater than anything they’d encountered from Wildcats.
Some pilots thought they were facing multiple aircraft firing simultaneously.
They weren’t.
They were seeing the effect of six 50 caliber guns firing from a single Hellcat.
The tracer rounds were loaded in a ratio of one tracer to four ball rounds.
That meant every fifth round was visible.
When a Hellcat fired, the pilot and anyone watching could see approximately 20 tracers per second streaming toward the target.
It looked like a solid beam of light.
One Japanese pilot, flight petty officer Saburro Sakai, one of Japan’s highest scoring aces with over 60 confirmed kills, engaged a Hellcat during a mission near Rabal in late 1943.
Sakai had been flying combat missions since 1938.
He’d fought in China over the Philippines at Guadal Canal.
He knew every trick, every tactic.
He positioned his zero for a high-side attack, diving from the Hellcat’s 7:00 position.
The American pilot, whose name Sakai never learned, saw him coming and turned hard into the attack.
Sakai expected the American to try to dive away.
That’s what Wildcat pilots did.
But this pilot turned toward him.
The two aircraft passed within 100 ft of each other.
Sakai saw the Hellcat’s wing guns firing, six muzzles flashing simultaneously.
The tracer pattern was so dense, Sakai initially thought two aircraft were firing at him.
He broke hard left and looked for the second aircraft.
There was none.
He’d been engaged by a single fighter firing six guns.
Sakai broke off the attack and extended range.
He later told other pilots that American fighters were now carrying arament comparable to twin engine aircraft.
He warned them not to make frontal attacks.
The firepower was too intense.
The volume of fire created a kill zone approximately 50 ft wide and several hundred ft deep.
Flying through that cone was suicide.
But many Japanese pilots didn’t believe him.
They’d been making frontal attacks against American bombers and fighters for 2 years.
Losses had been acceptable.
The Zero’s superior maneuverability usually allowed pilots to break off and evade before taking critical damage.
That calculus changed with the Hellcat’s six gun armorament.
Frontal attacks that worked against Wildcats were death sentences against Hellcats.
The closing speed in a head-on engagement was over 600 mph.
At that speed, the engagement window was approximately 2 seconds.
A Hellcat pilot could fire 200 rounds in 2 seconds.
that created a cone of fire containing approximately 160 ball rounds and 40 traces.
The projectiles spread across a 50- FFT circle at 300 yd.
A Zero flying through that circle would be hit by multiple rounds.
The Zero had no armor.
The fuel tanks weren’t self-sealing.
A single 50 caliber round through the engine could cause catastrophic failure.
A single round through the fuel tank could ignite a fire.
Multiple hits guaranteed destruction.
Japanese pilots learned this lesson repeatedly through November and December of 1943.
During the Gilbert Islands campaign, Hellcats from six carriers engaged Japanese aircraft over Tarowa and Minto at the kill ratio was staggering.
American pilots shot down over 100 Japanese aircraft while losing only 11 Hellcats.
Most Japanese losses came from the overwhelming firepower advantage.
Lieutenant Commander Edward O’Hare, who’d helped shape the Hellcat’s design through his April 1942 meeting with Grumman Engineers, never saw this vindication of his recommendations.
O’Hare died on November 26th, 1943 during a night combat mission.
But his influence lived on in every Hellcat that flew.
The six gun armament he’d advocated for was killing Japanese aircraft at rates no one had predicted.
The ammunition capacity was equally important.
2400 rounds meant a Hellcat pilot could engage multiple targets without worrying about running dry.
In a typical engagement, a well- aimed 3-second burst consumed approximately 300 rounds.
That meant eight full bursts before the guns were empty.
Most pilots never used all their ammunition in a single mission.
They’d engage three or four targets, expending between 900 and 1,200 rounds, and still return to the carrier with ammunition remaining.
This gave Hellcat pilots confidence.
They didn’t need to conserve ammunition.
They could fire sustained bursts, ensuring target destruction.
The psychological advantage was immense.
A zero pilot with 60 cannon rounds had to think carefully about every trigger pull.
A Hellcat pilot with 2400 machine gun rounds could be aggressive.
The engineering behind this ammunition capacity was sophisticated.
Each gun’s ammunition was beltfed from a container mounted directly behind the weapon.
The belts were loaded before each mission by ordinance crews on the carrier deck.
The process took approximately 45 minutes for all six guns.
The belts contained a mix of ammunition types.
Ball rounds for penetration, armor-piercing incendiary rounds for setting fires, tracer rounds for visibility.
The standard mix was four ball, one API, one tracer, repeating.
The API rounds were particularly effective against Japanese aircraft.
They combined a hardened steel penetrator with an incendiary charge.
When the round penetrated the target’s skin, the incendiary compound ignited, starting fires inside fuel tanks, oil lines, and hydraulic systems.
Against the Zero’s unprotected fuel system, a single API round could be catastrophic.
The Hellcat’s guns were harmonized to converge at 250 yards.
This meant all six streams of fire crossed at that specific distance, creating a concentrated impact point.
At ranges less than 250 yd, the pattern was wider, but still deadly.
At ranges greater than 250 yd, the pattern began to spread, reducing hit probability.
Experienced Hellcat pilots learned to hold fire until they were inside 300 yd, preferably closer to 200 yd.
At that range, even a brief burst would put enough rounds into the target to guarantee a kill.
The recoil from six 50 caliber guns firing simultaneously, was substantial.
Each gun produced approximately 40 lb of recoil force.
Six guns generated 240 lb total.
The Hellcat’s massive airframe and powerful engine absorbed this force without significant effect on handling.
The aircraft would shudder slightly when the guns fired, but remained controllable and accurate.
Pilots described the sensation as similar to driving over a rough road.
You could feel it, but it didn’t interfere with flying.
The sound was memorable.
Inside the cockpit, with the engine running and the headset on, pilots heard a deep hammering vibration when the guns fired.
The sound came through the airframe structure transmitted from the wings to the fuselage and up through the seat.
Outside the aircraft, observers described the sound as a sustained roar like tearing canvas amplified a thousand times.
The muzzle blast from six guns created shock waves visible in humid air as cone-shaped vapor clouds.
Japanese pilots who survived encounters with Hellcats consistently reported the intensity of American firepower in their afteraction debriefs.
Flight Lieutenant Yasuo Kuahara stationed at Rabal in early 1944 described an engagement where his fourplane division attacked a formation of six Hellcats.
Kuahara’s division approached from altitude using the classic tactic that had worked against Wildcats throughout 1942.
They dove from above, built up speed, and attempted to make a single firing pass before climbing back to safety.
The lead Hellcat saw them coming and turned into the attack.
The other five Hellcats followed, forming a defensive wheel.
Kuahara’s division leader pressed his attack anyway.
He opened fire at 400 yd with his 20 mm cannons.
The range was long, but he hoped to score hits before the Americans could respond.
The lead Hellcat returned fire immediately.
All six guns.
The tracer pattern was so dense that Kuahara’s division leader broke off his attack without closing to effective range.
He’d never seen that volume of fire from a single fighter.
He assumed he was facing experimental aircraft with unusual armorament.
Kuahara’s second section, Mate, continued his attack.
He closed to 200 yd before firing his cannons.
He scored several hits on a Hellcat’s wing, but the American aircraft continued flying.
The Hellcat’s self-sealing fuel tanks and structural strength absorbed the damage.
Then the Hellcat rolled toward the attacking Zero and returned fire.
The burst lasted approximately 2 seconds.
The Zero disintegrated.
Kuahara saw pieces of wing and fuselage separate from the aircraft.
The Zero fell away, trailing fire and debris.
The pilot didn’t bail out.
Kuahara and his division leader broke off and ran.
They’d lost one aircraft and scored no kills.
The remaining Hellcats didn’t pursue.
They maintained formation and continued their patrol.
When Kuahara returned to base, he reported the engagement to his squadron intelligence officer.
He described the American firepower as unprecedented.
He estimated the Americans were using at least eight machine guns per aircraft, possibly more.
The intelligence officer made notes but seemed skeptical.
Kuahara insisted he’d seen the tracer density.
No four gun fighter could produce that volume of fire.
The intelligence officer said he’d forward the report to higher command.
Nothing came of it.
Japanese intelligence was receiving similar reports from multiple theaters, but the information wasn’t being synthesized into actionable intelligence.
No one at the command level understood that American carrier fighters had doubled their armament.
The consequence was predictable.
Japanese pilots continued using tactics designed for fighting wildcats.
Those tactics failed catastrophically against Hellcats.
The kill ratio continued to favor American pilots by increasingly lopsided margins.
By January 1944, experienced Japanese naval aviators were being killed at rates that made veteran replacement impossible.
The training pipeline couldn’t produce pilots fast enough to replace combat losses.
Each dead experienced pilot was replaced by a rookie with less than 100 hours of flight time, sometimes much less.
These inexperienced pilots faced American aviators flying aircraft with overwhelming firepower advantages.
The result was slaughter.
During the Marshall Islands campaign in late January and early February 1944, American Hellcats achieved kill ratios exceeding 10 to1.
Japanese aircraft fell from the sky in numbers that shocked even American pilots.
Lieutenant Commander James Flattley, commanding officer of Air Group 5 aboard the carrier Yorktown, flew multiple missions during the Marshall Islands operation.
His Hellcat carried the standard six gun armament.
On February 17th, 1944, Flattly led a strike against Japanese positions on any wettook atal.
His formation encountered 12 zeros, attempting to intercept American bombers.
Flattly’s division of four Hellcats engaged the zeros from altitude.
The Americans dove through the Japanese formation, each Hlecat selecting a target.
Flattly opened fire at 300 yd.
His target, a Zero attempting to climb toward the American bombers, exploded after a two-cond burst.
Flatly estimated he’d fired 200 rounds.
Enough ammunition remained for several more engagements.
He climbed back to altitude and selected another target.
This Zero was more experienced.
The pilot saw Flattly coming and turned into the attack, trying to force an overshoot.
But Flattly had enough speed to maintain position.
He fired a deflection shot, leading the Zero’s turn.
The tracer pattern curved through the air and intersected the Zero’s flight path.
Multiple rounds struck the Zero’s cockpit and engine.
The aircraft rolled inverted and fell.
Flatly’s wingman, Lieutenant Junior Grade Daniel Carmichael, destroyed two zeros in the same engagement using similar tactics.
Dive from altitude, fire sustained bursts, climb back to safety.
The six gun armorament made every burst potentially lethal.
The Zeros fought back desperately, but their weapons couldn’t penetrate the Hellcat’s armor at range.
The 20 mm cannons were effective when they hit, but the Zeros couldn’t get close enough to guarantee hits without exposing themselves to devastating return fire.
The engagement lasted 7 minutes.
Flattly’s division destroyed six zeros and damaged three more.
No Hellcats were lost.
flatly returned to the Yorktown with 800 rounds remaining.
He could have continued fighting, but the Zeros had broken off and scattered.
If you find this story engaging, please take a moment to subscribe and enable notifications.
It helps us continue producing in-depth content like this.
When Flatly landed, his plane captain examined the Hellcat’s airframe for damage.
There were several small caliber bullet holes in the tail section, probably from 7.7 mm machine gun fire.
None had penetrated anything critical.
The armor and self-sealing tanks had done their job.
Flatly’s Hellcat was refueled, rearmed, and ready for another mission within 90 minutes.
The Ordinance crew loaded fresh ammunition belts, 2400 rounds, same as before.
Flatly flew two more missions that day, engaging Japanese aircraft on both sorties.
He expended another 1500 rounds and destroyed two more zeros.
He landed after the third mission with only 300 rounds remaining across all six guns.
That was the first time he’d come close to running out of ammunition in a single day of operations.
The armament reliability was remarkable.
The Browning M2 50 caliber machine gun was one of the most reliable weapons ever produced.
It could fire sustained bursts without overheating.
It could function in extreme cold at high altitude and extreme heat on tropical flight decks.
It rarely jammed.
When properly maintained, the guns could fire thousands of rounds without failure.
Grman had installed the guns with careful attention to maintenance access.
Each gun could be removed from the wing for cleaning or replacement in approximately 20 minutes.
The ammunition bays were accessible through panels on the wing’s lower surface.
Ordinance crews could reload all six guns without specialized equipment.
This maintenance simplicity was critical for carrier operations.
Flight deck crews worked under intense time pressure.
Aircraft had to be serviced, rearmed, and relaunched as quickly as possible.
Any weapon system that required extensive maintenance or complicated loading procedures would create bottlenecks.
The Hellcat’s armament system was designed for rapid turnaround.
Japanese aircraft carriers struggled with similar maintenance demands, but their fighter armament created different problems.
The Zer’s 20 mm cannons required careful alignment.
The 60 round drums had to be loaded manually and installed precisely.
The process took longer than belt feeding 50 caliber ammunition.
The cannon barrels wore out faster than machine gun barrels and required more frequent replacement.
These maintenance challenges compounded combat losses.
When Japanese carriers recovered aircraft after combat operations, the maintenance crews needed more time per aircraft than their American counterparts.
That meant slower launch cycles and fewer sorties per day.
The cumulative effect reduced Japanese combat effectiveness even when pilot skill and aircraft performance were equal.
By spring 1944, American carrier air groupoups were flying more sorties per day with higher sorty effectiveness than Japanese air groupoups.
The Hellcat’s reliable six gun arament was a significant factor in that operational advantage.
The Battle of the Philippine Sea in June 1944 demonstrated the culmination of American firepower superiority.
On June 19th, 1944, Japanese carrier aircraft launched four major strikes against American task force 58.
The task force included 15 carriers with over 450 Hellcats providing combat air patrol.
The Hellcats intercepted every Japanese strike wave.
The slaughter was methodical and comprehensive.
American pilots fired sustained bursts into densely packed Japanese formations.
The six gun armorament allowed Hellcat pilots to destroy multiple targets in single engagements without worrying about ammunition conservation.
Commander David Mccell, air groupoup commander aboard the Essex, shot down seven Japanese aircraft on June 19th.
He became an ace in a single day.
His Hellcat’s guns performed flawlessly throughout multiple engagements spanning nearly 4 hours.
He returned to the carrier with fewer than 100 rounds remaining, having fired approximately 2,200 rounds during the mission.
Every burst had found its target.
Macccull described the Hellcat’s armament as the decisive advantage.
He said Japanese pilots couldn’t survive in the cone of fire created by six 50 caliber guns.
If they entered that cone, they died.
Simple as that.
The guns didn’t miss at close range.
The volume of fire was too dense.
Other Hellcat pilots reported similar experiences.
Lieutenant Junior Grade Alexander Vrau, who’d scored his first kills in November 1943, shot down six Japanese aircraft in one engagement on June 19th.
He used approximately 1,400 rounds, an average of slightly more than 200 rounds per kill.
Each burst lasted between 2 and 3 seconds.
Vasu said he didn’t need exceptional accuracy.
The six guns threw enough lead into the air that if the target was anywhere near the gun site, enough rounds would connect to cause lethal damage.
This was the fundamental difference between the Hellcat’s armament philosophy and the Zeros.
The zero required precision.
The Hellcat allowed volume.
Japanese pilots who survived the Philippine Sea battle reported that American fighters had achieved complete firepower dominance.
Multiple pilots described feeling helpless against the intensity of American defensive fire.
One pilot, whose name wasn’t recorded in American intelligence summaries, said attacking an American fighter felt like attacking a bomber.
The defensive fire was that intense.
That comparison was accurate.
AB17 Flying Fortress carried 10 to 13 50 caliber machine guns.
A Hellcat carried six.
The difference was only four to seven guns, but the psychological impact was identical.
Japanese pilots had learned to avoid frontal attacks on B7 seconds because the defensive firepower was lethal.
Now they faced similar firepower from single engine fighters.
The Japanese had no effective counter.
They couldn’t increase the Zero’s armament without adding weight that would compromise performance.
They couldn’t add armor without reducing maneuverability.
They designed the Zero to maximize agility and range.
Those design choices had been correct for 1941, but by 1944, the war had changed.
American fighters had evolved to emphasize survivability and firepower over pure maneuverability.
The Hellcat represented that evolution perfectly.
It was heavier, tougher, and far more lethal than the Zero.
Japanese engineers tried to develop improved fighters.
The Mitsubishi J2M Raiden and the Kawanishi N1K Shidden both carried heavier armament than the Zero, but neither aircraft entered service in sufficient numbers to affect the strategic situation.
production delays, material shortages, and bombing raids on Japanese factories limited output.
By the time these improved fighters reached operational squadrons, American air superiority was absolute.
The six gun Hellcat had become the standard against which all other carrier fighters were measured.
In 1945, Grumman considered increasing the Hellcat’s armament to eight 50 caliber guns or replacing the 50 calibers with 20 mm cannons.
Test installations were built and evaluated.
But combat pilots overwhelmingly preferred the existing six gun configuration.
They valued the ammunition capacity and reliability of the 50 caliber installation.
The 20 mm cannons hit harder but carried less ammunition and jammed more frequently.
The additional two 50 caliber guns added weight without providing proportional improvement in lethality.
The Navy decided to keep the standard six gun configuration.
It worked.
Why change it? By the end of the war, Hellcats had destroyed 5,163 enemy aircraft in air-to-air combat.
that represented 75% of all Navy and Marine Corps aerial victories in the Pacific.
The six gun armament was directly responsible for most of those kills.
The 50 caliber machine gun had proven to be the ideal weapon for carrier-based fighters.
It provided excellent range, accuracy, penetration, and reliability.
The six gun installation provided overwhelming firepower without excessive weight.
The ammunition capacity allowed multiple engagements per sorty.
The maintenance requirements were manageable aboard carriers.
Japanese pilots never adapted to fighting Hellcats effectively.
The firepower gap was too large.
Tactics that worked against Wildcats failed against Hellcats.
Aggressive frontal attacks resulted in catastrophic losses.
Defensive maneuvers couldn’t avoid the dense fire patterns created by six guns.
The few Japanese pilots who survived multiple engagements against Hellcats learned to avoid combat when possible.
They would attempt to slip past American fighter patrols to attack the bombers, knowing that engaging the Hellcats directly was suicide.
But this defensive posture surrendered the initiative permanently.
American fighters controlled the air.
Japanese aircraft operated at American sufference.
Alex Vasu finished the war with 19 confirmed aerial victories, all flying Hellcats.
He credited the aircraft’s armament with saving his life multiple times.
He said, knowing he had overwhelming firepower made him confident and aggressive in combat.
He didn’t need to conserve ammunition.
He didn’t need perfect shooting.
He just needed to get close enough and press the trigger.
The Hellcat’s guns did the rest.
David Mccambbell ended the war as the Navy’s top ace with 34 confirmed kills.
Every kill was scored in a Hellcat.
He received the Medal of Honor for his actions during the Battle of Lee Gulf in October 1944 when he and his wingman destroyed 15 Japanese aircraft in a single engagement.
McCambell’s Hellcat landed aboard the carrier Langley with two rounds of ammunition remaining and fuel tanks nearly empty.
He’d been airborne so long that deck crews had given him up for lost.
He’d fired approximately 2398 rounds.
His guns had functioned perfectly throughout the extended mission.
No jams, no failures, just reliable, devastating firepower.
William Schwendler, Grumman’s chief design engineer, who’d incorporated Edward O’Hare’s feedback into the Hellcat’s design, never received public recognition for the six gun armorament decision.
But his choice to install six guns instead of four, changed the Pacific Air War.
That single design decision, supported by combat pilot feedback and authorized by the Bureau of Aeronautics, gave American naval aviators a decisive firepower advantage.
Japanese pilots faced aircraft they couldn’t effectively counter.
The Zero’s superior maneuverability became irrelevant when Hellcat pilots refused to turn and instead relied on overwhelming firepower.
The six gun installation became standard for American naval fighters.
The F4U Corsair carried six 50 caliber guns.
The F8F Bearcat carried four guns with increased ammunition capacity.
Postwar fighters like the F9F Panther initially carried four 20 mm cannons, but pilots complained about ammunition limitations.
The Navy eventually standardized on combinations that provided adequate ammunition capacity for extended engagements.
The lesson from the Hellcat’s six gun success was clear.
Firepower and ammunition capacity mattered more than pure weapons effects.
A pilot with plentiful ammunition could be aggressive and certain of achieving kills.
A pilot worried about running dry had to conserve ammunition and pick shots carefully.
Japanese pilots discovered this truth repeatedly through 1944 and 45.
Their cannons hit hard when they connected, but they didn’t have enough ammunition for sustained combat.
American pilots with 50 caliber guns and deep magazines could afford to miss.
They could fire sustained bursts.
They could engage multiple targets.
They returned to their carriers, confident they’d accomplished their missions.
The Hellcats guns were maintained meticulously throughout the war.
Ordinance crews checked each weapon after every mission.
Barrels were replaced after firing specified round counts.
Ammunition belts were inspected for defects.
The maintenance records showed remarkable reliability.
Fewer than 2% of missions involved gun malfunctions serious enough to affect combat effectiveness.
That reliability reflected the Browning M2’s inherent design quality and Grumman’s careful installation engineering.
The guns were mounted solidly.
The ammunition feed systems were robust.
The ejection systems cleared spent casings reliably.
Everything worked as designed under combat conditions.
In 1991, the National Air and Space Museum restored an F6 F5 Hellcat to flying condition.
The aircraft was painted in the markings of Commander David Mccambbell’s fighter, Mincy 3, with 34 Japanese flags painted on the fuselage representing his confirmed kills.
The restoration included complete internal systems, including the six gun arament installation.
Museum curators examining the weapons noted the installation’s elegant simplicity.
Each gun was precisely mounted.
The ammunition paths were carefully routed.
The entire system was accessible for maintenance.
The engineers who designed this installation in 1942 had understood carrier operational requirements perfectly.
Seven Hellcats remain airworthy today.
All retain the original six gun armament configuration, though the guns are typically deactivated for safety during air show performances.
When these aircraft fly, spectators see the same machine that gave American pilots overwhelming firepower superiority in the Pacific.
The sound of a Hellcat’s Pratt and Whitney R2800 engine is distinctive, a deep, powerful rumble that symbolizes American industrial might.
But it’s the six gun ports in the wings that represent the Hellcat’s true lethality.
Those six weapons firing in unison created a cone of destruction that Japanese pilots couldn’t survive.
That was the innovation that changed the air war, not superior maneuverability or speed, though the Hellcat had both.
Not advanced tactics, though American pilots used those effectively.
It was raw firepower.
six 50 caliber machine guns firing 200 rounds per second with 2400 rounds of ammunition, creating a kill zone that Japanese aircraft entered and never left.
Japanese pilots heard eight guns firing.
The sound distorted by combat stress and tracer density and realized they were facing flying fortresses, single engine fighters with bomber level defensive armorament.
They’d been taught to attack aggressively, to close to pointblank range, to trust their aircraft’s superior maneuverability.
But those tactics required surviving the approach.
Against Hellcats, survival meant staying out of range, and staying out of range meant surrendering the fight.
Thank you for watching.
For more detailed historical breakdowns, check out the other videos on your screen now.
