The Glove That Turned A Handshake Into An Execution

1943 to 44, a Philadelphia workshop.

Engineers from the RF Sedgley Company examined prototypes of their latest creation for the United States Navy.

It looks like an ordinary leather work glove, heavy cowhide, the kind a laborer might wear, but sewn onto the back of the hand sits a short metal tube with a plunger extending past the knuckles.

The instructions are simple.

Make a fist.

Punch your target in the body.

The glove fires a 38 caliber bullet directly into them at point blank range.

No drawing a weapon, no aiming, just a handshake that ends in death.

At least that is the legend.

The weapon is not silent.

It is not subtle, and it was never built for assassins.

The truth behind the Sedgley glove gun is stranger than the myth.

It is remembered as a spy weapon, but it was designed as a panic tool.

That mismatch between reputation and reality tells us everything about why American and British approaches to covert weapons development produced such different results during World War II.

The origin story you will hear most often involves construction workers.

In the Pacific theater, American CBS faced a problem that no standard weapon could solve.

The naval construction battalions were military builders tasked with constructing air strips, roads, fuel depots, and fortifications on remote atoles scattered across thousands of miles of ocean.

By 1943, the island hopping campaign had created a peculiar tactical situation.

American forces seized islands for their strategic value, established bases, and moved forward.

But securing an island and eliminating every Japanese defender were different things entirely.

Their work placed them within striking distance of Japanese forces, often on islands that had been bypassed rather than fully secured.

These men operated heavy machinery, bulldozers weighing 15 tons, road graders stretching 20 ft long, cranes capable of lifting artillery pieces onto prepared positions.

Operating this equipment demanded total concentration.

Both hands occupied at all times, steering levers in one hand, throttle and blade controls in the other, eyes fixed on the work surface to avoid obstacles, maintain grade, and coordinate with ground crews.

A CB on a bulldozer could not reach for a sidearm if a Japanese soldier emerged from the jungle.

Both hands gripped controls.

Drawing a holstered 45 meant releasing steering levers, releasing throttle, reaching across the body, unsnapping the retention strap, drawing, aiming, and firing.

That sequence took precious seconds, not moments.

A charging attacker closed the distance faster than an operator could react.

Japanese infiltration tactics exploited this vulnerability with lethal efficiency.

Small groups of holdouts, sometimes numbering only three or four men, survived in dense jungle for months after their main forces withdrew.

They had no hope of evacuation, no expectation of relief.

What they had was patience, local terrain knowledge, and absolute commitment to killing as many Americans as possible before dying.

They attacked at dawn when operators were groggy.

They attacked during shift changes when equipment was momentarily stationary.

They targeted isolated machines that wandered beyond immediate rifle support.

The operators could see death coming and could do nothing about it because their hands were occupied.

That is one origin story.

But Captain Stanley Martin Hate’s patent tells a broader tale.

The patent text itself, United States patent 2,423,448 filed in February 1944, frames the weapon more generally as a hand-to-hand and surprise infiltration defense tool that can be worn continuously.

The specific CB scenario may have been one motivation among several.

What the patent makes clear is that Hate, a 1918 Annapapolis graduate, designed a weapon fired by the natural motion of throwing a punch.

When the wearer’s fist connected with a target, the weapon discharged automatically.

The original patent specified a 410 shotell as ammunition.

Hate reasoned that a shot spread pattern would compensate for imprecise aim during chaotic close quarters combat.

During production, the Navy changed the specification.

Most surviving examples are chambered in 38 Smith and Wesson, though some sources report 38 special.

The likely reason for the change was recoil management.

A 410 shot shell generates significant kick.

Mounted rigidly to the back of the hand with no grip structure to absorb the force.

That recoil would transfer directly into the wearer’s wrist and forearm.

The 38 offered adequate stopping power with manageable recoil.

RF Sedgley Incorporated of Philadelphia received the manufacturing contract.

The company already produced Mark 5 signal pistols and flare guns for the Navy.

Regginal F.

Sedgley founded the firm around 1916, primarily manufacturing socket sets under the Hexel brand alongside custom sporting rifles.

The glove gun contract was small by wartime standards.

Production totaled somewhere between 50 and 200 units according to various estimates.

No complete Navy procurement records have surfaced publicly.

What is certain is that every manufactured example was stamped US Navy property and carried the official designation handfiring mechanism mark 2.

The technical specifications reveal clever engineering working within severe constraints.

The barrel measured 2 and 7/8 in smooth boore rather than rifled.

Smooth ball construction simplified manufacturing and eliminated concerns about bullet spin at contact range where accuracy was irrelevant.

The entire mechanism weighed approximately 1 lb and attached to the glove via six brass rivets.

The glove itself was heavy cowhide, the kind used for industrial work, capable of withstanding the stress of repeated firing without tearing away from the rivets.

An L-shaped safety lever with a spring-pressed bulent held the mechanism safe until deliberately disengaged.

The bulldent was critical.

It provided positive retention strong enough that the safety would not accidentally disengage during normal hand movements, but light enough that the wearer could flip it off quickly when needed.

To prepare the weapon for firing, the wearer pulled back a cocking knob at the rear of the mechanism to compress the firing pin spring, then rotated the safety lever to the fire position.

From that point, any solid punch against a resistant surface would discharge the weapon.

The firing sequence worked through mechanical simplicity.

When the wearer punched a target, the impact surface at the front of the plunger struck first.

The plunger drove rearward through its guide tube.

This rearward motion engaged a cam mechanism that rotated against the sear.

The sear depressed, releasing the spring-loaded firing pin.

The pin struck the primer.

The weapon discharged.

All of this happened in the fraction of a second between the punch landing and the fist stopping.

The shooter did not need to think about firing.

The punch itself was the trigger pull.

Reloading demonstrated the weapon’s limitation as anything beyond a single use defensive measure.

The operator released a spring latch at the barrel pivot, swung the barrel upward on its hinge like a break-action shotgun, manually extracted the spent cartridge using fingernails or a small tool since there was no automatic ejector, inserted a fresh round, closed the barrel until the latch engaged, and recocked the mechanism by pulling the knob rearward again.

The process required 15 to 20 seconds minimum for a trained user working calmly.

Under stress with shaking hands in darkness or rain, the time could double.

This was acceptable for a weapon designed to buy time for escape.

It was unsuitable for any operation requiring multiple targets.

Now, before we examine what actually happened when this weapon reached units, if you are enjoying this exploration of covert weapons engineering, consider subscribing.

It costs nothing and helps the channel continue this research.

Now, let us address the central myth, the handshake assassination.

It is the image that dominates every discussion of the Sedgley glove gun.

An agent in civilian clothes approaches a target at a social function.

He extends his hand in greeting, the universal gesture of peaceful intention.

The target reaches out to accept.

Their palms meet.

The agent squeezes, driving the concealed plunger into the target’s chest.

A muffled shot.

The target crumples.

The agent expresses shock, calls for assistance, and walks away in the confusion.

This scenario appears in countless articles, forum discussions, and documentary scripts.

It almost certainly influenced Quentyn Tarantino’s 2009 film in Glorious Bastards.

There is one fundamental problem with this narrative.

According to Ian McCollum of Forgotten Weapons, who physically examined a specimen at the National World War II Museum, there is no publicly documented record of any Sedgley glove gun being used in combat.

A few anecdotes circulate, including one popular story about a CB named John Blocker using the weapon to kill an attacker who climbed onto his road grader.

But these accounts are not independently verifiable from public records.

They may be true.

They may be embellished retellings.

They may be pure invention.

Without archival documentation, we cannot know.

The practical obstacles make assassination use implausible, even in theory.

Consider the mechanics.

The plunger extends beyond the muzzle by approximately 1 in, creating an obvious metal protrusion visible during any handshake.

Any target with functioning eyesight would notice it.

The firing motion requires a punch, a forceful impact driving the plunger rearward against spring pressure.

A handshake involves gripping and squeezing.

These are mechanically incompatible motions.

You cannot punch someone while shaking their hand.

The geometry does not work.

Most critically, the weapon produces a full volume gunshot.

No suppression, no muffling, no sound reduction of any kind.

A 38 caliber pistol firing at contact range produces a report audible for hundreds of meters in open terrain.

Farther in urban environments where buildings reflect and channel sound, for an actual assassination operation, an unsuppressed singleshot weapon requiring physical contact, offered no tactical advantage over a blade.

A knife is silent, reusable, requires no ammunition, leaves no ballistic evidence, produces no muzzle flash.

An assassin who genuinely wanted to kill at contact range and then escape would use a blade every time.

The weapon was issued to some units.

One reported example in museum collections is attributed to a beach jumper unit 7 officer identified as Hannah.

According to curatorial accounts, he was issued the glove gun with instructions to use it if his boat was boarded.

His response was instructive.

He boxed it up, mailed it home as a souvenir, and procured a standard cult 1911 instead.

He wanted a weapon that worked.

The comparison with British special operations executive reveals why this particular American design missed the mark for covert operations.

British designers working at station 9 in Wellin understood that any assassination weapon required one non-negotiable feature: silence.

Without silence, escape was impossible.

Without escape, the weapon was a suicide device rather than an operational tool.

Every design decision at station 9 started from this principle.

How quiet can we make it? How do we get the operative out alive? Major Hugh Reeves designed the S SOE sleeve gun in 1943 based on this principle with Birmingham Small Arms manufacturing between 150 and 200 units.

The official SOE catalog described it as a shortlength silent murder weapon.

That description was not marketing.

It was operational specification.

The sleeve gun fired a 32 ACP cartridge through an integrally suppressed barrel concealed inside the operative’s coat sleeve.

The suppressor was not an attachment.

It was built into the weapon from the start, making the entire package slim enough to hide under clothing.

The weapon was invisible during normal movement.

A cable ran from the trigger mechanism down the arm and across the back to the opposite hand.

The operative approached their target, extended their arm as if pointing or gesturing conversationally, and squeezed the hidden cable with their other hand.

The weapon discharged with minimal sound, quiet enough to go unnoticed in a moderately noisy environment.

After firing, the barrel slid back into the sleeve.

The operative walked away, appearing completely unarmed.

No visible weapon, no evidence of what had just happened.

The well-rod pistol represented British suppressed weapons engineering at its most refined.

Designed at Station 9 and manufactured by Birmingham Small Arms, over 2,800 units were produced during the war.

Available in 32 ACP and 9mm Parabellum variants, the Wellrod was engineered for exceptionally low sound signature compared to service pistols.

Exact decel figures vary by test conditions and measurement standards, but contemporary accounts described the report as quieter than a car door closing.

Operatives could eliminate targets at ranges up to 30 yard without alerting nearby enemies.

The bolt action required manual cycling between shots, deliberately slowing the rate of fire to allow the suppressor baffles to cool and maintain effectiveness.

The wellrod remained in British service for decades after the war.

Confirmed present during the Falkland’s conflict in 1982, nearly 40 years after its introduction, the weapon proved its design so thoroughly that no replacement was deemed necessary.

That longevity speaks louder than any specification sheet.

German concealed weapons development pursued different goals.

The SS belt buckle gun was a prototype chambered in 7.65 mm, intended primarily as an escape device for officers facing capture rather than an assassination tool.

Extremely rare genuine examples and later reproductions exist with surviving specimens differing in caliber and configuration.

Nazi intelligence services developed nothing resembling a glove mounted weapon.

Japanese military intelligence relied on traditional close combat methods.

The absence of international copies of the glove gun concept speaks to its fundamental limitation.

The verdict on the Sedgley glove gun requires separating what it was designed to accomplish from what legend claims it did.

As a defensive last resort for personnel who could not draw conventional sidearms, the concept addressed a genuine, if narrow problem.

Men operating heavy machinery in hostile territory needed some form of protection when conventional holster draw was impossible.

The concept made sense.

The execution was flawed.

A single shot weapon with a lengthy reload time offered marginal improvement over training personnel to keep holstered pistols within faster reach or mounting weapons to machinery where they could be grabbed quickly.

The soldiers who received glove guns recognized this immediately.

They obtained conventional sidearms instead.

Practical men facing practical problems chose practical solutions.

As an assassination weapon, which it was never actually designed to be, the glove gun was functionally worthless.

The British designers at Station 9 understood what covert operations required.

They spent years refining suppressed weapons.

They tested sound signatures obsessively.

They designed for concealment before, during, and after the engagement.

They consulted with operatives who had actually conducted assassinations in occupied Europe and incorporated their feedback.

They manufactured thousands of effective units that saw real operational use.

The American glove gun represents ingenuity applied to a narrow defensive problem, then misremembered by popular culture as something entirely different.

The mythologizing began almost immediately after the war and accelerated through decades of sensationalist magazine articles.

Each copying claims from earlier sources without verification until the fictional narrative became more famous than the actual history.

The numbers tell the story of relative effectiveness.

Between 50 and 200 Sedgely glove guns manufactured, no publicly documented combat uses, only unverifiable anecdotes that may or may not reflect actual events.

Compare this to the wellrod.

Over 2,800 produced during the war alone.

Deployed across every theater where SOE and OSS operated.

Documented kills in Norway, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Italy.

Still in British service four decades after the war ended because nothing better existed for the role.

The difference was understanding actual operational requirements.

British designers asked what operatives genuinely needed to survive and succeed.

The Sedgley program asked what would solve an immediate tactical problem for equipment operators, then watched as popular imagination transformed their modest defensive gadget into something far more dramatic.

Today, surviving glove guns occupy museum cases and private collections.

The National World War II Museum in New Orleans displays a beach jumper specimen.

The International Spy Museum in Washington includes a glove pistol among their collection highlights.

For collectors, auction houses have recorded sales ranging from $3,000 to $16,000 depending on condition and provenence.

The weapons are classified as curio and relic items under American federal firearms regulations.

Return for a moment to that Philadelphia workshop.

The Sedgely engineers believed they had created something useful, a weapon hidden on the hand, a punch that could save a life.

The reality proved more modest.

The men who received these weapons understood their limitations instantly.

They wanted firepower, not single shots.

They wanted reliability, not novelty.

Meanwhile, in a converted country house in Hertfordshire, British engineers were building the weapons that actually shaped covert warfare.

Station 9 produced tools for killing quietly and escaping successfully, suppressed, concealable, effective, designed by people who had spoken with operatives returning from occupied Europe and understood that assassination requires silence, precision, and escape routes.

The wellrod, the sleeve gun, the dil carbine.

These were the weapons that SOE operatives carried into France, Norway, and the Low Countries.

Not because they looked clever in demonstrations, because they worked when operatives lives depended on them.

The glove that turned a handshake into an execution makes an irresistible story.

Hollywood loves it.

Collectors prize surviving examples.

The truth is less cinematic, but more instructive.

The Sedgley program built a defensive gadget for a specific tactical problem.

Those who received it rejected it in favor of proven alternatives.

British engineers working on different problems with different requirements built assassination weapons that remained in service for half a century.

One program produced a curiosity.

The other produced tools that changed history.

The difference was never about engineering talent.

Both nations had that in abundance.

The difference was understanding what covert warfare actually required.