He writes a referral request to the regional military medical authority for specialist surgical consultations citing the Geneva Convention obligation to provide prisoner medical care equivalent to that provided to American service personnel.

He marks the request urgent.

He writes in the referral, “Patient is an unusual case presenting with 17 confirmed shrapnel fragments from four separate combat injury events over a 14-month period.

Several fragments are in anatomically complex locations, requiring specialist evaluation that exceeds this facility’s surgical capability.

request specialist consultation and potential transfer to a facility with vascular and neurosurgical capacity.

If you are enjoying this story and want more untold accounts from World War II prisoners of war, make sure to subscribe to the channel.

We are bringing you stories that most history books never covered.

We are now 2 days after the examination at Camp Forest and Irwin is lying on the procedure table in room three for the first extraction session.

Dr.

Chen is performing the five superficial extractions because Harwell is attending to another medical emergency in a different compound.

Chen is efficient and precise.

She uses a local anesthetic injection at each site, waits for it to take effect, and then removes each fragment with forceps through a small incision.

The fragments are placed in a metal tray as they come out.

Each one makes a small sound when it lands.

A faint clink of metal on metal.

Irrwin hears this sound five times over the course of the session.

He is awake.

Local anesthesia means he cannot feel the procedure, but he can hear it.

And the sound of metal coming out of his body and landing in a tray is an experience that he processes with the same quiet practicality he applies to everything.

Jen works with the interpreter, Corporal Schaefer, in the room to allow communication.

Between extractions, she asks Irwin questions to monitor his comfort and to manage the time efficiently.

She asks, “When did you first know you were being hit by shrapnel?” Sheer translates.

Irwin says, “The first time near Ella Laming in January of 1942, I heard the shell land and felt the impact in my calf and arm before I heard the explosion.

The impact came first.

” Chen says, “That is consistent with the velocity of shrapnel fragments from that distance.

” She moves to the next site.

She asks, “Was there ever a period when you were not carrying at least one unresolved fragment?” Sheer translates.

Irwin thinks.

He says, “No, from the 1st January until today, there was always at least one fragment in me that had not been removed.

” Chen pauses between instruments.

She says, “That is a long time to carry something like that.

” Sheer translates.

Irwin says, “You carry what you have to carry.

” Chen looks at him for a moment over the procedure field.

She says something in English that Sheiffer translates as, “Yes, that is true.

” The fifth fragment comes out.

Chen drops it in the tray.

It makes the small metal sound.

The tray now holds five pieces of metal that were inside a human body for periods ranging from 6 months to 20 months.

Irwin looks at the ceiling.

He breathes.

He says nothing.

We are now 3 weeks into Irwin’s time at Camp Forest and the two surgical sessions for the intermediate depth fragments have been scheduled.

We are still at camp forest and Harwell has received approval from the camp commonant and the regional medical authority to conduct the surgical sessions in the camp’s procedure room which is equipped for surgical operations up to a moderate complexity level.

Harwell has consulted by written correspondence with a surgical colleague at a regional military hospital about the specific techniques required for the two most technically demanding of the seven intermediate fragments and has received detailed guidance in return.

He
has also received confirmation that the specialist referral for the three complex fragments has been approved and that Irwin will be transferred to a military hospital facility for those consultations after the intermediate extractions are complete.

The first surgical session addresses four of the seven fragments.

Harwell works with a surgical assistant nurse and sheer on call outside the room for communication.

The general anesthesia is administered by a medic trained in anesthesia support, a practical capacity that many camp medical facilities developed out of necessity during the war.

Irwin goes under in the specific way that general anesthesia puts people under quickly with a single long breath and then stillness.

Harwell works for 2 hours and 14 minutes.

He extracts all four fragments without complication.

The most technically demanding of the four is a fragment in Irwin’s right upper arm that is positioned between two muscle groups in a way that requires careful separation of the muscle layers to avoid permanent damage to the arm’s range of motion.

Harwell takes his time on this one.

He does not rush it.

He extracts the fragment and places it in the tray.

He closes.

He calls the time.

He sits for three minutes after the session is complete before writing his notes.

When he writes the notes, he describes the procedure as successful with no identified complications.

He writes this matter-of-actly the way a physician writes good outcomes accurately and without drama because the drama was in the work and the note is for the record.

The second surgical session 10 days later addresses the remaining three intermediate fragments.

This session is faster, 2 hours flat, because the three fragments are in positions that Harwell assessed as technically straightforward relative to the first session’s challenges.

He extracts all three.

He closes.

He writes the notes.

The tray now holds 12 fragments in total.

Five from the superficial session, four from the first surgery, three from the second surgery.

12 pieces of metal that came out of a 24 year old man from Lauderbach Saxony.

The remaining five, two lower leg fragments pending phase 4 assessment, and the three complex fragments that require specialist consultation at a hospital facility.

Harwell writes the transfer request the morning after the second surgery.

He marks it priority.

We are now 6 weeks into Irwin’s time at the Camp Forest Medical System and the transfer to the regional military hospital for specialist consultations has been approved and scheduled.

We are moving now from Camp Forest to a military hospital facility in the region where Irwin will be seen by a vascular surgeon and a neurosurgeon for the three remaining complex fragments.

This is still 1943 and we need to understand what this transfer means in the context of the prisoner of war medical system.

The transfer of a German prisoner to an American military hospital for specialist surgical care was not a routine event.

Military hospitals were primarily intended for American service personnel.

Transferring a prisoner required authorization at several levels of the camp and regional military administration.

Documentation of medical necessity under Geneva Convention standards.

security provisions for the prisoner during transport and during the hospital stay and coordination with the hospital administration to manage the logistical and security dimensions of having an enemy prisoner in a facility designed for American patients and staff.

All of this happened.

The authorization was granted.

The medical necessity documentation was Harwell’s referral letter.

The security provision was two military police escorts who accompanied Irwin for the duration of the transfer and hospital stay.

The hospital administration received Irwin without significant incident.

Though the administrator who processed his admission papers did pause at the height notation on the transfer documents and looked up when Irwin came through the door with his two escorts and said nothing, but wrote something in the
margin of the form that the records do not preserve.

The vascular surgeon who assessed the femoral artery fragment was a colonel named Dr.

for William Patterson, a specialist with 15 years of surgical experience and a particular interest in combat vascular injuries.

Patterson reviewed Harwell’s X-rays, conducted his own examination, and scheduled the extraction for the following morning.

He told Irwin through an interpreter that the procedure carried a real risk.

The fragment was close enough to the femoral artery that any unexpected movement during extraction could damage the vessel.

And a damaged femoral artery in a surgical setting in 1943 presented a serious and potentially life-threatening bleeding risk.

He said, “I want you to understand what I am doing and why before we do it.

” The interpreter translated.

Win said, “I understand.

” He said, “I have been carrying this fragment for over a year.

I would like it out.

Patterson said, “We will get it out.

” He spent two hours on the extraction the following morning, working with the specific careful, deliberateness of a surgeon who knows exactly what he is next to and treats that knowledge with full respect.

The fragment came out intact.

The femoral artery was not damaged.

Patterson closed and stepped back from the table and said to his assistant, “Clean extraction, no complications.

” His assistant said, “Clean, Patterson said, document it and send it to Harwell.

We are still at the military hospital facility.

” And the neurosurgeon has now examined the brachial plexus fragment in Irwin’s right shoulder.

The neurosurgeon is a lieutenant colonel named Dr.

Ruth Avery, 40 years old, one of a small number of female neurosurgeons in the American military medical system, trained at John’s Hopkins and assigned to this facility because her specialty is rare enough that she goes where she is needed regardless of the usual administrative patterns.

She reviews Patterson’s notes, reviews Harwell’s original X-ray series, and orders a new X-ray study of the shoulder region at higher resolution than the camp unit could produce.

She examines this new study for 20 minutes.

Then she calls Irwin into her consultation room.

She tells him through the interpreter what she has found.

The fragment is positioned in the right shoulder in close proximity to the brachial plexus.

the bundle of nerves that controls movement and sensation in the arm and hand.

It has been there by her calculation from the wound history for approximately 15 months without causing the kind of neurological symptoms that proximity to those nerves can produce, numbness, weakness, loss of fine motor control.

The fragment has in the language of wound medicine encapsulated.

The body has built a fibrous tissue boundary around it.

isolating it from the surrounding anatomy.

This encapsulation is the reason it has coexisted with the brachial plexus for 15 months without damaging it.

Avery says, “The question I have to answer is whether surgical extraction is safer than continued encapsulated presence.

” She pauses.

She says, “My current assessment is that it is not.

The extraction carries a meaningful risk of disrupting the encapsulation and damaging the nerve bundle in the process of reaching the fragment.

The risk of leaving it given that it has been stable for 15 months and shows no signs of causing neurological damage is lower than the risk of the extraction procedure.

She says, “I am recommending we monitor it rather than extract it.

If it shows any signs of migration or neurological compromise in future examinations, that recommendation will change.

But right now, leaving it in place is the safer choice.

The interpreter translates.

Irwin is quiet for a moment, he says.

So, one piece stays.

Avery says, “One piece stays under surveillance.

” Irrwin looks at his right shoulder for a moment.

He says, “It has been there for 15 months, and I still have the use of my arm.

” Avery says, “Yes, that is exactly the argument for leaving it.

” Irrwin says, “All right.

” Avery says, “We will examine it every 6 months for the duration of your time in American custody and document any changes.

” Irrwin says, “I understand.

” He sits with the decision for a moment, then he says to the interpreter in German, something that the interpreter translates for Avery as, “Tell her I appreciate the explanation.

She gave me the full picture and let me understand the choice.

Tell her that matters.

Avery hears this and writes it in her case notes, not because it is clinically relevant, because she thinks it deserves to be in the record.

We are still at the military hospital and the thoracic fragment, the one in Irwin’s right lateral chest that the Camp Forest X-ray could not fully resolve, is the last of the three complex cases to be assessed.

The physician managing this assessment is a general surgeon named Major Harold Baines, who has been working on the thoracic cases at the hospital since 1942, and who brings to the examination the specific focused attention of someone who has spent two years looking at what artillery and shrapnel can do to a human chest and who has developed a strong
professional opinion about when to extract and when not to.

Baines conducts the highresolution imaging study and then spends the better part of a morning reviewing it with his resident physician, a young doctor named Dr.

Tors.

What they find is not what either Harwell or Avery predicted from the Camp Forest X-rays.

The Camp Forest images suggested the fragment was in the lateral chest wall, which would be a moderate complexity extraction.

The higher resolution imaging shows the fragment is actually in the intercostal space between two ribs, a position that is technically more accessible than chest wall soft tissue under the right conditions.

But it also shows something else.

The fragment has a small secondary piece adjacent to it that the lower resolution images did not resolve clearly enough to identify separately.

There are not one but two fragments in the thoracic region.

The total count when Baines documents this finding goes from 17 to 18.

Baines writes to Harwell, “Corrected fragment count 18, not 17.

Secondary thoracic fragment identified on highresolution imaging.

Both thoracic fragments are in a position accessible for extraction under general anesthesia with intercostal approach.

I recommend extraction of both in a single session.

request authorization.

Harwell reads this letter in his office at Camp Forest.

He reads it twice.

He writes back, “Authorized.

Schedule at your convenience.

” He then takes out the intake chart and the body diagram that now has 17 marks on it and adds one more mark to the right lateral chest with a note.

Secondary fragment identified at hospital imaging.

Count revised to 18.

He looks at the diagram with its 18 marks.

He thinks about the British sergeant at the surrender in Tunisia who told his corporal to make sure the medical people saw this man.

He thinks about the camp forest intake nurse who stopped counting at 12.

He thinks about Irwin saying, “I was told at least four.

” He thinks about the gap between 4 and 18 and what that gap means in terms of what this man’s body has been carrying and for how long and without adequate documentation.

He puts the chart in the folder.

He stands up.

He goes to the next patient.

We are now in the fall of 1943, 3 months after Irwin’s arrival at Camp Forest, and the extraction program is effectively complete.

16 of the 18 fragments have been removed.

One remains in the right shoulder under Avery’s monitoring protocol.

One lower leg fragment assessed by Harwell as stable and encapsulated with extraction risk exceeding benefit has been added to the monitoring list alongside the shoulder.

Irwin’s wound sites are healing.

The surgical incisions from the two camp forest procedures and the two hospital procedures are closing cleanly.

He is eating three adequate meals a day.

He is sleeping in a heated barracks.

He is gaining back the weight that the desert campaign took from him.

The physical recovery is visible and measurable.

What is less easily measurable but equally real is the adjustment that happens in a human being when chronic pain that has been present for months or years is removed.

For 14 months in North Africa and for the three months of the transport chain before Camp Forest, Irwin’s body had been operating under the constant background load of unresolved shrapnel wounds.

Not dramatic acute pain in most cases because the body adapts to chronic pain by reclassifying it from signal to noise, but load nonetheless, metabolic and neurological, consuming resources that a healthy body uses for other things.

As the fragments come out one by one and the wound sights heal, Irwin notices things returning that he had not noticed leaving.

The shoulder that caught the January 1942 fragment has a range of motion it lacked for 18 months.

The left thigh that carried the femoral artery fragment no longer aches when he walks the camp perimeter in the morning.

He sleeps longer and more deeply than he has slept since 1941.

He is assigned to the camp work detail in October 1943 after being cleared for physical labor by Harwell at the 6-week postsurgical check.

The work detail takes him to a local Tennessee farm 3 days a week.

On his first day at the farm, the foreman, an older man named Cooper, who has been managing prisoner work details for several months, looks at Irwin the way everyone looks at Irwin for the first time.

With a specific combination of surprise and recalibration that his height always produces, Cooper says nothing about the height.

He assigns Irwin to the heavy lifting station because the previous work detail had been struggling with the weight of the harvested tobacco bales and it is immediately apparent to Cooper that Irwin will not struggle with them.

Irwin carries bales for 8 hours.

He does not struggle.

He comes back to the camp in the evening and eats his dinner and writes in the small journal he has been keeping since the second week of his captivity.

He writes, “I lifted things today.

My shoulder did not catch.

My thigh did not ache.

I have been carrying metal for two years and now it is mostly gone.

And today I lifted things and nothing hurt.

He closes the journal.

He goes to sleep.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

(1848, Macon) Light-Skinned Woman Disguised as White Master: 1,000-Mile Escape in Plain Sight – YouTube

Transcripts:
The hand holding the scissors trembled slightly as Ellen Craft stared at her reflection in the small cracked mirror.

In 72 hours, she would be sitting in a first class train car next to a man who had known her since childhood.

A man who could have her dragged back in chains with a single word.

And he wouldn’t recognize her.

He couldn’t because the woman looking back at her from that mirror no longer existed.

It was December 18th, 1848 in Mon, Georgia, and Ellen was about to attempt something that had never been done before.

A thousand-mile escape through the heart of the slaveolding south, traveling openly in broad daylight in first class.

But there was a problem that made the plan seem utterly impossible.

Ellen was a woman.

William was a man.

Continue reading….
« Prev Next »