The $100 Billion Race to Replace the Strait of Hormuz Has Begun

I am looking at a map right now, a flat, clean, deceptively simple map of the Persian Gulf.

And on that map, someone has drawn a straight line, just a single line across a small peninsula in Omen, connecting two bodies of water, 21 miles, maybe less.

It looks so obvious, it almost feels like a mistake that nobody built it 100 years ago.

And that line may that one innocent looking line is the center of one of the most dangerous, expensive, and politically explosive engineering fantasies in the modern world.

A canal.

A man-made waterway through the mountains of Omen designed to eliminate the world’s most dangerous choke point.

A project with a price tag that could hit 100 billion dollars.

An idea that keeps coming back every time the world remembers how exposed it really is.

And right now in March 2026, the world is remembering hard because the straight of Hormuz, the real thing, not the fantasy bypass and is not just under threat anymore.

It is effectively closed.

Not theoretically, not as a geopolitical warning.

Closed as in tankers are sitting at anchor outside the straight.

As in daily transits have collapsed from over 150 per day to fewer than 13.

As in the International Energy Agency just launched the largest emergency oil reserve release in its entire history.

As in Brent crude is trading above $100 a barrel and analysts are warning it could hit 200.

Stay with me because in the next few minutes I am going to take you through exactly how we got here, why the canal fantasy keeps coming back, why it can never work the way people think, and what the world actually faces when its most critical pressure point finally snaps.

This is Daily Brief.

If you’re not subscribed yet, now is the time because things are moving fast.

Let us go back.

Not 72 hours, further than that.

The straight of Hormuz has always been the thing everyone in global energy is quietly terrified of.

It sits between Iran to the north and Oman to the south.

At its narrowest point, it is roughly 21 miles across.

But the actual shipping lanes, the corridors where the world’s biggest tankers actually move, are just 2 miles wide in each direction.

two miles.

That is it.

That is the corridor through which, as reported by the US Energy Information Administration, approximately 20 million barrels of oil flowed every single day in 2024.

That is about 20% of all global petroleum consumption.

It is not just a major route.

It is in a very real sense the heartbeat of the global energy system.

And here is the thing that makes it so terrifying.

It is not just narrow geographically.

It is fragile politically.

Iran sits on one side.

The United States fifth fleet is based in Bahrain.

Israel has been conducting operations in the region.

The tension in this waterway is not new.

It is baked in.

It is structural.

In 2018, when the Trump administration pulled the United States out of the Iran nuclear deal, tensions spiked.

In 2019, there were unclaimed attacks on ships in the Gulf region.

A downed American drone seized tankers.

In April 2024, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps seized the Portuguese flagged container ship MSC Aries.

In early 2025, a June conflict between Iran, Israel, and the United States came and went without a full closure.

But the warning was there, written clearly for anyone paying attention.

Then came February 28th, 2026.

The United States and Israel launched coordinated air strikes on Iran.

The targets were military facilities, nuclear sites, and senior leadership.

And everything changed.

Within days, the IRGC issued warnings prohibiting vessel passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

Not suggestions, warnings backed by force.

As reported by the UK Maritime Trade Operations Center, Iran carried out over a dozen attacks on ships attempting to transit the strait.

Five crew members were killed on two separate vessels.

The US flagged STA imperative was struck twice at the port of Bahrain.

A port worker was killed and then the numbers started moving.

Ship transits which had been running at over 153 per day in the weeks before the conflict collapsed.

According to analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies using Starboard Maritime Intelligence data, only 13 vessels were detected passing through the straight in a single day by March 2nd.

8% of normal volume.

a single oil tanker.

Nearly 2,000 vessels are now stranded, waiting on both sides.

The International Maritime Organization Secretary General Arcenio Dominguez confirmed this directly to Al Jazzer.

2,000 ships anchored, going nowhere.

And in the background, a familiar idea is back.

That line on the map, the canal through Omen.

Subscribe to Daily Brief if you have not already because what I am about to show you explains why that idea keeps coming back and why it could never actually save us.

Reveal number one, the pressure point that the world built its entire energy system around.

Here is what makes Hormuz uniquely terrifying.

It is not just that 20% of global oil flows through it.

It is who depends on it and how completely.

According to data from the US Energy Information Administration, in 2024, approximately 84% of the crude oil moving through the strait was headed to Asian markets.

China and India alone accounted for over 40%.

Japan sources roughly 95% of its crude oil from the Gulf region.

South Korea around 75%.

These are not marginal dependencies.

These are existential supply chains.

When Hormuz closes, Japan does not just pay more for oil.

Japan starts rationing.

Japan starts calling emergency meetings about strategic reserves.

As reported by Reuters, Japanese refiners asked their government to release stockpiles within days of the conflict beginning.

And it is not just Asia.

Even the United States, despite being the world’s largest oil producer, imports roughly half a million barrels per day from Persian Gulf countries through the strait.

As explained by Mark Finley, a non-resident fellow at Rice University’s Baker Institute, if something goes wrong anywhere, the price goes up everywhere.

Trump claimed at a press conference on March 9th that the closure does not really affect the United States.

That claim was fact checked and dismantled by analysts because oil is a global market.

When supply is cut anywhere, prices rise everywhere.

American drivers have already seen gasoline prices spike by more than 50 cents per gallon since the conflict began.

20 million barrels per day.

That is the number.

That is the weight of what the world put through a corridor 2 miles wide.

And now here is what makes the situation even more explosive.

Iran is not just blocking the straight.

According to reporting by Lloyd’s List and confirmed by Al Jazzer, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has effectively set up a toll booth system.

Ships that want to pass need to submit to a vetting scheme run by the IRGC.

Vessels approved under this system, 26 in the past two weeks, pay to transit.

Iranian lawmaker Alied and Borujered told Iran International that some ships have been charged $2 million per transit.

Iran has also announced it is seeking legislation to formalize toll collection.

An Iranian official told state media the straight of Hormuz is a corridor.

Iran ensures its security and it is natural for ships to pay duties.

This is not a blockade anymore.

This is a gate and Iran is the gatekeeper.

Wait, because it gets worse.

Reveal number two, the alternatives that already exist and why they are not enough.

Before we get to the canal fantasy, let us talk about what already exists.

Because the answer to why nobody built a bypass is not that nobody thought of it.

They did.

They built some.

And the results reveal exactly why the problem is so much harder than it looks on a map.

Saudi Arabia operates the Petroline, a 1 to200 kilometer pipeline connecting its eastern province oil fields to the port of Yanbu on the Red Sea.

It was built in the 1980s specifically in response to the tanker war of 1984 to 1988 when both Iran and Iraq attacked each other’s shipping and more than 500 vessels were damaged or destroyed.

The UAE built the Abu Dhabi crude oil pipeline 360 kilometers connecting Habshan to the port of Fujira on the Gulf of Oman commissioned in 2012.

These pipelines matter.

They are real.

They provide real relief.

Saudi Arabia has been diverting crude to Yanbu throughout March 2026.

As reported by Reuters, those shipments are on course to hit record highs in March.

But here is the problem.

The petroline’s current capacity is around 7 million barrels per day.

The Abu Dhabi pipeline carries only 1.

5 million barrels per day.

Both were running near capacity before the conflict began.

And as Gulf News reported, neither pipeline comes close to replacing the roughly 20 million barrels per day that normally move through Hormuz, even combined, even running flat out.

The math does not work.

So what about the canal reveal number three? The hundred billion dollar dream that collapses the moment you leave the map.

Every time Hormuz gets mentioned in a crisis, the canal idea resurfaces.

Right now in March 2026, as reported by Arab News, it is flooding social media.

Someone pulls up a map of the Persian Gulf.

They draw a line across the Musenam Peninsula, the rugged piece of Omani territory that juts into the straight like a natural fortress.

They measure the distance 24 miles or 38 kilometers at one proposed crossing point between DBA al-Hisen and Rosal alka 50 miles at another.

They say why not just cut through it and on a flat map it almost sounds reasonable but flat maps lie.

The Musandam Peninsula is not flat.

It is part of the Hajar mountains.

Sharp limestone peaks rise straight from the coastline.

Some of those summits reach more than 2,000 meters above sea level.

This is not desert terrain you can dredge.

This is not sand you scoop out with heavy equipment over a few years.

This is solid mountain, ancient rock, compressed limestone you would need to blast, fragment, and haul away by the hundreds of millions of tons before you even had a trench, let alone a canal.

And the canal cannot be small.

To be useful, it would need to handle very large crude carriers, some of the largest ships ever built.

That means the canal would need to be at minimum 150 m wide and 25 m deep across its entire length.

According to analysis published by Arab News, a canal through the Hajar range would require something in the order of 240 locks.

Each one individually larger than many of the world’s biggest dams.

That is not engineering.

That is planetary surgery.

And here is the strategic irony at the center of the whole idea.

A canal would actually be more vulnerable than the straight it replaces.

The straight of Hormuz is wide, dynamic, and heavily traffked.

A canal is narrow, fixed, and predictable.

You do not need to destroy a waterway to close a canal.

You just need one grounded ship, one stranded tanker.

We saw this in March 2021 when the Evergiven blocked the Suez Canal for six days.

One vessel, six days.

Global supply chains in chaos.

A canal through Musandam would be the highest value target in the world and the easiest to shut.

Cost estimates reach into the hundreds of billions.

For reference, the Panama Canal expansion, not a new canal, just an expansion, took nearly a decade and cost around $5 billion.

A sea level cut through limestone mountains capable of handling super tankers would dwarf anything the modern world has ever attempted.

And even if every dollar materialized, every political obstacle dissolved, every engineering challenge was somehow solved, the timeline would stretch to decades.

Decades.

The crisis is happening now.

Sagon.

Stop for a second because I want you to understand what we are actually watching in real time.

As of this week, nearly 2,000 vessels are anchored outside the straight of Hormuz.

Tanker traffic is down approximately 90 to 95% from its pre-conlict average according to shipping intelligence firm Kapler.

The International Energy Agency has launched its largest emergency reserve release in history.

Brent crude briefly touched $100 a barrel.

Analysts are warning of 120 if there is no medium-term resolution and up to 200 in a prolonged crisis.

Iraq began shutting down operations at the Romela oil field on March 3rd because tankers had nowhere to go and storage was full.

An entire oil field shutting down.

India and Pakistan have deployed destroyers to escort tankers in the Gulf of Oman, not through the strait just outside it.

China, which receives between 40 and 50% of its oil imports through Hormuz, has dozens of ships trapped in the Persian Gulf.

According to CSIS reporting, ship tracking data shows that Chinese tanker and container ships have all but ceased transits since the conflict began, leaving them stranded.

Beijing has publicly urged all parties to keep the straight open, but it has no leverage to make that happen.

As of March 15th to 21st, only 16 crossings by ships with active AIS signals were observed in the straight in a single week.

Meanwhile, Windward Maritime Intelligence detected eight so-called dark ships, vessels over 290 meters long operating with their AIS switched off moving in the straight.

This is what the closure of Hormuz actually looks like.

Not a clean geopolitical abstraction.

2,000 ships sitting at anchor.

Five crew members dead.

Fuel prices rising on every continent.

If you work in shipping, manufacturing, energy, or anything that depends on supply chains, that is most of the global economy.

This is not a distant policy debate.

It is your cost structure, your delivery timelines, your energy bill already changing.

Daily brief.

Hit like if this is making sense.

Leave a comment.

Did you see this coming? I read everyone.

Now, let me show you the two paths forward because I see them clearly and neither one is comfortable.

Path one, the negotiated off-ramp.

In this scenario, diplomacy finds traction before the military campaign escalates further.

Trump’s pause extended to April 6th holds.

Back channel talks between Washington and Thrron produce a framework.

Iran agrees to reopen the strait in exchange for some combination of sanctions relief, security guarantees, and international recognition of its interests in the waterway.

One of Iran’s five publicly stated conditions for ending the war.

The IRGC toll booth system is quietly wound down.

Tankers begin moving again.

Markets stabilize.

Brent crude retreats.

In this scenario, the infrastructure conversation that follows becomes serious for the first time.

Saudi Arabia’s petrol line gets upgraded.

The UAE pipeline gets expanded.

New capacity gets built on roots that do not thread through a 21-m bottleneck.

The canal dream fades again.

And the world breathes.

But here is the condition.

It requires Iran to accept terms it has publicly refused.

It requires Trump to offer concessions he has publicly ruled out.

It requires a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that both sides have publicly said is not imminent.

That is a lot of conditions.

Path two, the long spiral.

In this scenario, the April 6th deadline passes without a breakthrough.

The US military campaign intensifies.

Iran escalates.

More attacks on vessels, mines in the waterway.

Horizontal escalation.

Brent crude moves toward 120 than 150.

The IEA reserve release buys weeks, not months.

Asian economies begin rationing.

Industrial production in Japan and South Korea starts to slow.

The tanker war of 1984 to 1988 damaged or destroyed over 500 vessels.

That conflict ended because both sides eventually exhausted themselves.

This conflict has different dynamics, different actors, different capabilities, and the world’s energy dependence on this corridor is far greater now than it was 40 years ago.

Nobody wins in that scenario.

Everyone bleeds.

I think we are currently closer to path two than the public conversation acknowledges.

But I have been surprised before and the history of the straight of Hormuz is a history of crises that seemed impossible to resolve until they were.

Here is what I know for certain.

The canal dream, the beautiful, clean, straight line on the map, is not a solution.

It never was.

It is a symptom.

A symptom of how deeply uncomfortable the world has become with the geography it built its energy system on top of.

20% of global oil through a corridor 2 miles wide, controlled in part by a country that has now demonstrated it is willing to use that control as a weapon.

That vulnerability is real.

The fear driving the canal fantasy is real.

The global dependence is real.

But the solution keeps running into mountains.

Literally, what the world actually needs is not a canal through Oman.

It is a slower, less dramatic, far more expensive reckoning.

More pipelines, more capacity on alternative routes, more diversification in energy sourcing, less concentration of 20% of global supply through any single corridor.

None of that is fast.

None of it is visual.

None of it fits on a map the way that straight line does.

And that is the uncomfortable truth at the center of this story.

The straight of Hormuz remains the most important energy corridor on Earth.

Not because nobody has imagined alternatives, but because the alternatives are brutally hard, politically complicated, financially staggering, and decades away from making a real difference.

In the meantime, the world holds its breath, watches the tanker traffic numbers, checks Brent crude, and waits to see whether diplomacy or force will reopen a waterway that keeps roughly 1if of the global economy moving.

One narrow passage, one region under pressure, one disruption away from consequences that reach every country, every fuel pump, every shipping container, every factory floor on the planet.

That is what Hormuz is.

not just a choke point, a mirror showing the world exactly how exposed it really is.

So, here are the questions I want you to answer in the comments.

Is the canal fantasy a useful pressure release, a reminder that alternatives are imaginable, or does it actually distract from the harder, slower work of building real redundancy? Iran now controls what functions as a toll booth on 20% of global oil.

If this crisis ends with Iran maintaining any formal or informal authority over transit, does that permanently reshape the geopolitics of Gulf Energy and the one I keep coming back to? When the dust settles on this conflict, will the world have learned enough to actually reduce its dependence on Hormuz? Or will it rebuild exactly the same system and wait for the next crisis? Leave your answers below.

I read every comment and I will be back with the next update as this situation develops.

This is daily brief.