By 1953, the Legion had been fighting continuously in Indochina for 7 years.

Its regiments had been bled, rebuilt, and bled again.

New recruits, fewer Germans now, as West Germany began its own economic recovery, cycled through the depot and into the line.

The war was consuming the Legion, and the Legion was consuming everything France threw into it.

In November 1953, the French high command under General Enri Navar made a decision that would bring the war to its final crisis.

They chose a remote valley in northwestern Tonkan near the Le Oceanian border, accessible only by air, and established a fortified position there.

The place was called Denbenfu.

The valley was 12 km long and six wide, surrounded on all sides by hills rising several hundred meters above the valley floor.

A small town occupied the center.

An airirstrip ran along the valley’s axis.

A French battalion was dropped in by parachute on November 20th, 1953, and the position was reinforced over the following weeks into what the French command believed would be an impregnable fortified camp.

The concept was the hedgehog, a central position strong enough to resist attack, an air strip capable of sustaining supply indefinitely, and a garrison able to sorty against any besieging force.

The position was also bait.

Gap, the thinking went, would be compelled to attack it or watch it threaten his logistics into Laos.

When he attacked, French firepower would destroy his forces in the open.

The decisive battle the French had been unable to provoke for years, would finally come.

The concept rested on assumptions that Gap, systematically demolished before the first shot was fired.

The French assumed that artillery could not be brought through the mountains in sufficient weight to threaten the airrip.

Gap’s engineers spent four months moving 105mm and 75 millimeter guns through terrain that French doctrine classified as impossible for heavy weapons.

Tens of thousands of Vietnam laborers disassembled weapons, carried components up mountain slopes by hand, and reassembled them in firing positions on the ridge lines overlooking the valley.

When those guns opened fire in March 1954, the French artillery commander, Colonel Charles Pyro, who had personally guaranteed the position could not be effectively shelled, reportedly went to his dugout and killed himself with a hand grenade.

The battle began officially on March 13th, 1954.

Vietmin forces attacked and overran the strong point designated Beatatrice held by the third battalion of the 13th Foreign Legion demi Brigade.

The 13th DBLE, one of the legion’s most storied formations.

Beatrice fell within hours.

Its garrison was killed or captured to a man.

Gabrielle fell the following night.

Anmarie was largely abandoned as its Thai auxiliary garrison dissolved into the jungle.

The French garrison of roughly 16,000 men was now encircled in a valley whose air supply was increasingly compromised.

Vietman anti-aircraft batteries on the surrounding heights made daylight resupply missions hazardous.

Night drops were imprecise.

The mathematics of a siege worked inexurably against the garrison.

The legion’s component was substantial.

The 13th DBLE held the central strong points.

Its three battalions, including a large proportion of Germanspeaking NCOs and enlisted men, fought from beginning to end.

The rebuilt first beep was reinforced by drop.

men jumping directly into the besieged valley as the perimeter contracted, landing on a drop zone under artillery fire.

Knowing before they stepped out of the aircraft that the odds were not favorable, Gap’s approach was methodical.

His engineers dug zigzag approach trenches that gradually extended toward the French perimeter through February, March, and April, tightening the noose.

The strong points fell one by one.

Dominique Huget Elellanne contested with desperate ferocity, changing hands multiple times in night fighting that cost both sides heavily.

The wounded accumulated in a central medical facility increasingly inadequate for the numbers requiring treatment.

On the night of May 6th and into the morning of May 7th, 1954, the Vietmen launched their final assault.

The remaining strong points were overrun.

The French command with no defensive perimeter remaining and no prospect of relief or supply ordered a ceasefire.

The garrison commander, General Christian Dcastri, was captured in his command bunker.

Around 10,000 men were taken prisoner.

Of those prisoners, fewer than half, estimates range between 3,000 and 4,000 survived captivity and were repatriated after the Geneva Accords of July 1954.

The march to the prisoner camps on foot through hundreds of kilometers of highland terrain killed thousands.

Malaria, dantry, and inadequate food in the camps killed more.

German-sp speakaking legionnaires were among the dead, the prisoners, and the few hundred who escaped through the jungle toward Laos.

Where they had given their real names, those names appeared on casualty lists.

Where they had served under assumed identities, they vanished from the record with the anonymity the legion had promised them when they enlisted.

The fall of Denbianfu on May 7th, 1954 ended the French Indochina War.

The Geneva Accords of July 21st partitioned Vietnam at the 17th parallel.

The French withdrew.

The Legion redeployed to Algeria where another war had already begun.

The Indina War had cost France roughly 75,000 dead.

The men who had fought in it returned or did not return to a France that had already begun the process of forgetting them.

The myth did not arise fully formed from a single source.

It assembled itself incrementally from components that each contained some grain of truth, distorted through multiple retellings until the grain was invisible within the fabrication around it.

The first component was the Vietmin’s own propaganda apparatus, sophisticated, politically disciplined, and working toward a specific end.

The Democratic Republic of Vietnam, having defeated a French colonial army, needed to frame that victory within the ideological context of the Cold War.

Framing the Indochina War as an anti-fascist struggle, not merely a colonial war, but a continuation of the fight against fascism, served multiple purposes.

It aligned the DRV’s cause with the Soviet Union and China.

It delegitimized French rule.

It gave the victory moral weight in Western circles where anti-fascism retained genuine traction.

After May 1954, DRV publications repeatedly characterized the French Foreign Legion as a force of fascist criminals.

They published statements claiming that significant numbers of the DNBMU garrison had been former SS soldiers.

These claims were assertions made by a government with strong incentives to make them unaccompanied by documentation that independent researchers could evaluate.

This is not to say the claims were entirely without foundation.

Some SS veterans did serve in the Legion.

Their presence was real.

The DRV’s propaganda exaggerated it enormously, but the exaggeration had a factual hook on which to hang itself.

A claim that contains a deformed version of something true is far harder to dismiss than one that is wholly fabricated.

The second component was Western journalism’s appetite for the sensational.

The fall of Denbianfu attracted enormous international press coverage.

Journalists were working with the information available to them, DRV claims, testimony from returned prisoners shaped by captivity and in some cases by DRV briefings before repatriation, and the long-standing popular understanding that the Legion recruited from Europe’s outcast
populations.

The SS in Vietnam angle was a natural fit for the logic that governed much popular coverage of the war.

The third and most durable component was fictional literature that presented itself as testimony.

The central text is Devil’s Guard, published in 1971 under the name George Robert Elford.

The book presented itself as the memoir of a former Waffan SS officer, an Oberanura who had led an SS unit through the entire Indochina war.

It provided tactical detail, personal anecdotes, and precisely the atmospheric darkness that suggested authenticity.

Military historians who examined the book found it riddled with problems.

Tactical operations described by Alfred did not correspond to documented French operations.

Unit designations and movements contradicted archival sources.

The persona of the narrator was consistent with literary construction, not an actual military career.

The consensus among professional historians of the Indina War is that Devil’s Guard is almost certainly fiction.

A war novel with a first person narrator designed to be read as memoir.

The book’s influence was substantial.

It was widely read and translated into multiple languages.

It provided a detailed, seemingly credible account of exactly the scenario that DRV propaganda had described.

For readers who encountered it before the scholarly literature, it set the terms of what SS in India meant.

Later, sensational accounts drew on it, often without citation, as though its claims were established fact.

The phrase last battle of the SS crystallized this confusion.

It implied that DNBN FFU represented some form of final stand by SS veterans.

A notion that was cinematically compelling and historically baseless.

The battle of DNBNFU was not an SS battle, a German battle or a Nazi battle.

It was a French colonial defeat inflicted by a Vietnamese national army on a garrison of French, North African, Vietnamese, and Foreign Legion troops of whom the German-sp speakaking component was predominantly vermarked veterans, not SS veterans.

Why does the myth persist? The SS in Vietnam narrative appeals to a specific political imagination on multiple sides of the spectrum.

For those who want to diminish French colonial enterprise, the association with fascism is rhetorically convenient.

For readers of popular military history, a story about organized Nazi criminality persisting into the postwar jungle wars offers the satisfactions of genre fiction.

Moral clarity, extreme competence, darkness with a familiar shape.

The archives do not provide those satisfactions.

The archives provide incomplete records, contested estimates, and men without names hiding behind assumed identities in an institution designed from its founding to resist biographical accountability.

What the archives support is more mundane and in its way more disturbing.

A large number of displaced, desperate European men, including some with serious moral liabilities from the Nazi years, serving in a colonial war France could not sustain against a nationalist movement with sufficient popular support to win.

The simpler story is not true.

The transition from the French Indo-China War to the American Vietnam War was not clean.

It was a series of overlapping involvements connected by geography and by the persistent reality of Vietnamese resistance to outside military domination.

The men who bridged both phases of the conflict are a small and specific category.

The most thoroughly documented individual in that category is not a former legionnaire or SS veteran.

He is a Finnish officer named Lori Turney, known to American special forces as Larry Thorne.

His biography is documented in military records and official US Army documentation in ways that distinguish him from the fabricated protagonists of works like Devil’s Guard.

He is worth examining precisely because his documented history is simultaneously more complicated and more credible than the mythology around him.

Lori Alan Turney was born on December 28th, 1919 in Vipuri, the city on the Curelian Ismos that would later be seeded to the Soviet Union and renamed Vyborg.

He grew up in an independent Finland that had separated from Russia in 1917 and spent its formative years under persistent Soviet pressure.

When the Soviet Union attacked Finland on November 30th, 1939, initiating the Winter War, Tney was 20 years old and serving as a non-commissioned officer in the Finnish army.

Finland held the main Soviet assault along the Curelian ismas, inflicting hundreds of thousands of casualties on Red Army forces, though the final terms required Finland to seed roughly 11% of its territory.

Turney fought in the Winter War and emerged with a reputation for aggressive leadership in difficult conditions.

The continuation war began in June 1941 when Finland moved to retake the territory lost in the winter war.

Nominally as a co-belligerant with Germany in what the Finnish government characterized as a separate national conflict.

Tney served as an officer in this conflict, eventually commanding a unit specializing in deep penetration operations behind Soviet lines, longrange patrols, gathering intelligence, disrupting communications, and conducting irregular operations at extraordinary risk.

Finland negotiated a separate armistice with the Soviet Union in September 1944.

By that point, Tney had gone to Germany to undergo additional training with Waffan SS forces, an episode documented in his service record.

The context matters.

Finland fighting for national survival had accepted German military assistance throughout the continuation war.

Finnish officers underwent training with German formations as part of that broader relationship.

Turnie’s brief SS training period in 1944 was not an ideological commitment to national socialism.

It was a component of Finnish German military cooperation in the final phase of a war Finland had fought on its own terms against a Soviet Union that had attacked it twice in 5 years.

After the armistice, Tony’s situation was precarious.

He was arrested by Finnish authorities for unauthorized paramilitary activity, escaped and made his way through Sweden and Britain to the United States.

part of the wave of anti-communist immigrants navigating the complex immigration landscape of the early Cold War.

The American political context of the late 1940s and early 1950s had room for men like Turney.

The Cold War had reframed the calculus of wartime allegiance in US intelligence and military circles.

Someone who had fought the Soviet Union with skill and effectiveness, regardless of the allies he had fought alongside, possessed capability the American national security operators found useful.

Tney was naturalized as an American citizen in 1954 under the Immigration Act provisions for individuals who had served in anti-communist military forces.

He enlisted in the United States Army under the anglicized version of his name, Larry Thorne.

He was commissioned as an officer in the Special Forces, later known as the Green Beretss, where his expertise in unconventional warfare and longrange reconnaissance made him a genuinely valued member of the organization.

He went to Vietnam.

By the early 1960s, the American involvement in South Vietnam had escalated from a small advisory mission to a substantial military presence.

Special forces were running the civilian irregular defense group program, training Montineyard tribesmen in the central highlands, and conducting classified operations along the border with Laos and Cambodia.

Captain Larry Thorne was exactly the kind of man special forces had been designed to use.

On October 18th, 1965, a UH34 helicopter carrying Thorne and other personnel on a classified mission in South Vietnam went down in Quang Try Province.

All aboard were killed.

The circumstances of the crash, enemy fire, mechanical failure, or some combination were never fully established in publicly available records.

Thorne’s body was not recovered.

He was declared missing in action.

The remains were located in 1999 by a joint American Vietnamese team working the MIA accounting mission.

DNA identification confirmed the remains as Thorns.

He was buried with full military honors at Arlington National Cemetery on June 26th, 2003.

The marker at Arlington identifies him as Captain Larry A.

Thorne, United States Army Special Forces.

It does not mention Finland or the Winter War or the Continuation War or the brief waffan SS training period in 1944.

It marks the end of a life that had moved through three armies, two nations and multiple wars across 4 and a half decades, not as a mercenary or an ideologue, but as a soldier who fought consistently against the same enemy from 1939 to 1965 and died in the service of a country that had given him citizenship and a new name.

Thorne is not relevant
here because he represents the typical trajectory of German-sp speakaking legionnaires and he was Finnish, never served in the Legion and his brief SS association was categorically different from the career service of committed idologues.

He is relevant because his documented case illustrates how complex wartime histories accumulated around individual soldiers in the postwar decades.

He had served in a Waffen SS formation.

He had been granted American citizenship and a special forces commission.

He had died on a classified American military mission in Vietnam.

These facts coexist in the historical record without contradiction because history unlike mythology does not require its subjects to be morally simple.

What does the evidence actually support? It supports the presence of Germanspeaking men in the French foreign legion in very large numbers.

approximately 48% of legion strength across the linguistic group that includes Germans, Austrians, Alsatians, Folk Deutsche and other German speakers.

This is not disputed by any serious researcher.

It supports the presence of some Waffan SS veterans within that group.

The Waffan SS at its peak had nearly 1 million men under arms.

It would have been extraordinary if the Legion’s German-sp speakaking recruits had contained none.

What the evidence does not support is the characterization of the Legion’s German speaking component as predominantly or substantially SS derived.

The scholarly estimate points to a minority are in some calculations a singledigit percentage uncertain and based on imperfect sources but pointing firmly away from the mass SS narrative.

The majority appear to have been conventional vermached veterans.

What the evidence does not support is the claim that captured legionnaires at DNBFU constituted a cohort of identified SS war criminals or that the battle’s command structure was organized around SS loyalties.

The battle was fought by the French military.

Its legion component was commanded by French officers.

Its German-speaking NCOs served in a hierarchy that ran upward to Sansia graduates, not to alumni of Bad Tuls or Brownvik.

the SS officer training schools.

What the evidence categorically does not support is Devil’s Guard.

The book’s central narrative has no credible archival foundation.

No French military records support it.

No independent testimony corroborates it.

Its tactical and operational claims contradict documented history.

It is not a source.

It is a legend maker and it has been spectacularly effective at making the legend.

The persistence of the myth has a human cost.

The Vietmin’s defeat of France was not a military operation against fascist holdovers.

It was a political military campaign by a national liberation movement against a colonial power with insufficient will and insufficient resources to sustain its position.

Continue reading….
« Prev Next »