Campfran formed each assigned specific roads for assault.

These battle groups were combined arms teams, panzas, panza grenaders, engineers, and supporting arms operating together.

Camp grouper formed from elements of Das Reich encountered fierce resistance along its route, but managed to reach the Karkov suburb of Jalutino by 1600 hours on March 11th.

At this point, they faced an anti-tank ditch covered by anti-tank guns and artillery.

Soviet defenses around Kharkov had been prepared over weeks.

Trenches, bunkers, and obstacles ringed the city.

Meanwhile, other Dar Reich elements situated south of Karkov severed Soviets from the Marfa road, cutting a key supply route.

In Kov, combat unfolded with unparalleled intensity.

Each street witnessed brutal struggle, advancing methodically as Reich gained the upper hand, systematically overcoming Soviet defenses.

The street fighting in Karkov resembled urban combat from the previous century in its brutality.

Buildings had to be cleared room by room.

Soviet troops occupied cellars, upper floors, and fortified positions in rubble.

German panzer grenaders worked in small teams, one group providing covering fire while another maneuvered.

Flamethrowers burned out stubborn positions.

Pioneers blew holes through walls to avoid exposing soldiers to fire in streets.

The Soviet line succumbed to relentless assault by Das Reich forces.

The entire cityscape filled with smoke from burning buildings.

Das Reich’s tanks spearheaded the assault with grenaders methodically clearing Soviet positions house by house.

Panza support proved crucial.

When grenaders encountered a fortified building, tanks would fire directly into the structure, collapsing walls and creating entry points.

During the battle, Houseer receiving orders from Hoth faced a critical decision.

Fourth Panza army commander Herman Hoth directed Houseer to detach Das Reich from the Karkov assault and redirect the division northeast to counter a Soviet threat developing in that sector.

This order came at a crucial moment in the street fighting.

Das Reich units were deeply engaged throughout the city.

Some Grenadier companies were fighting for individual buildings.

Houseer faced a dilemma.

Breaking off mid battle risked throwing away all gains achieved through days of costly urban combat.

The Soviets would immediately reoccupy cleared sectors.

German casualties already suffered would be for nothing.

Extracting units from ongoing street fighting would expose them to Soviet counterattack.

Units cannot simply disengage from close combat.

The enemy is often within hand grenade range.

Withdrawal requires covering forces, coordination, and time.

Houseer argued that breaking off the assault was too dangerous.

The division was deeply committed to street fighting.

Delays in heavily forested areas to the northeast would be prolonged.

The forests provided cover for Soviet units, making movement slow and dangerous.

Extracting the division from ongoing urban combat would expose his troops to Soviet counterattack during movement.

Instead, Houseer sent a detachment from Totenkov to cover the northeast sector while Das Reich completed the Karkov operation.

This decision puts in direct conflict with fourth Panza army command.

Hower chose battlefield reality over strict obedience to orders.

In the Prussian military tradition, subordinates were expected to obey orders absolutely.

Officers who failed to obey faced court marshall, potentially execution.

Houseer risked his career and potentially his life by refusing Hol’s directive.

His decision stemmed from professional military judgment, not political ideology.

The old Imperial Army officer understood that tactical success required commitment to the fight at hand.

Abandoning Karkov mid assault would waste the division’s combat power and sacrifice soldiers lives for no operational gain.

The battle for Karkov had momentum.

Thus, Reich was winning.

Withdrawing now would surrender the initiative.

Houseer believed completing the capture of Karkov served operational objectives better than redeploying to face a threat the Totenov elements could handle.

This moment cemented House’s reputation as a field commander rather than a political general.

He demonstrated he would prioritize military necessity over bureaucratic compliance.

His decision directly influenced the success of the Karkov counter-stroke.

Had thus Rich withdrawn, Karkov might not have fallen, or its capture would have taken significantly longer and cost more casualties.

The victory at Karkov proved Houseer right.

Hoth did not pursue disciplinary action.

Results mattered more than procedural correctness.

By late afternoon, the entirety of Das Reich had departed Karkov for the north.

Only SSBanfur Bozing’s battalion of SS Panza Grenadier Regiment Deutsland persisted in sweeping through the city southwest, encountering minimal resistance.

Substantial cleanup operations remained, but the German offensive persisted.

Soviet resistance in Karkov had collapsed.

The city fell.

On March 15th, fighting erupted in the factory district southeast of the city.

Campropper from Dasich assaulted the massive tractor factory complex from the south, successfully clearing it of resistance by March 16th.

The tractor factory had been converted to military production.

Soviet forces defended it stubbornly, recognizing its industrial value.

Grenaders fought through workshops and assembly halls.

The facto’s reinforced construction made it a fortress.

Only systematic application of combined arms tactics, tanks, assault guns, infantry, and engineers working together allowed its capture.

House’s decision to complete the Karkov operation before redeploying proved correct.

The city fell to German forces.

This represented Das Reich’s last great operational victory, a successful urban offensive that demonstrated the division’s tactical capability at its peak.

The recapture of Karkov marked a pivotal moment for the Waffan SS.

The success achieved even greater significance with the recapture of Belgarod on March 18th.

This triumph served as catalyst for subsequent expansion of the Raffan SS.

Witnessing establishment of numerous new divisions.

Hitler was impressed by the SS Panza core’s performance.

He authorized expansion of the Rafan SS creating additional Panza and Panza Grenadier divisions.

The recapture of Karkov and Belgarod secured strategic strongholds and solidified Waffan SS influence for propaganda purposes.

The victory was invaluable.

It demonstrated German forces could still win major battles on the Eastern Front.

British and Canadian intelligence took note of Adas Reich’s performance at Karkov.

Allied intelligence services monitored German formations carefully, tracking their movements and assessing their capabilities.

Allied assessments recognized the division as a capable formation with experienced leadership and high combat effectiveness.

Intelligence reports noted the division’s aggressive tactics and ability to conduct complex operations such as coordinated attacks and urban warfare.

However, Allied intelligence also tracked US Reich’s record of reprisals against civilians, particularly in occupied territories.

Reports from resistance networks and intelligence operatives documented SS atrocities.

This reputation would follow the division throughout the war.

Allied intelligence officers briefing their commanders on German dispositions would note when Das Reich was identified in a sector, flagging it as a highquality formation that could be expected to fight hard.

Soviet intelligence similarly assessed Waffan SS Panza divisions as dangerous opponents.

Red Army command recognized these units tactical aggression and superior equipment compared to standard vermarked formations.

Soviet afteraction reports frequently mentioned SS divisions, noting their tendency to counterattack rather than withdraw and their willingness to take casualties to hold positions.

However, Soviet strategists understood that while Waffen SS divisions posed tactical challenges, they could not alter strategic realities.

German manpower and industrial capacity could not match Soviet resources.

The Soviet Union was producing more tanks, more artillery, more aircraft than Germany.

Soviet factories relocated beyond the eurals were beyond German bomber range.

Every month the correlation of forces shifted further in Soviet favor.

Tactical excellence at division level could not compensate for strategic exhaustion at the national level.

Thus Reich could win battles.

Germany could not win the war.

This understanding informed Soviet operational planning.

The Red Army would accept heavy casualties to grind down German forces.

Soviet losses were severe, often higher than German losses in any given engagement, but sustainable.

German losses were not.

From April to July 1943, soldiers of Das Reich Division underwent recovery before being thrust into the battle of Kusk.

The division received replacements, integrated new equipment, and conducted training.

Operating as a component of second SS Panza Corps under command of General Hoth’s fourth Panza army, Das Reich would execute a strategic penetration into the southern portion of the Kursk salient, safeguarding the core’s right flank.

Operation Zitadel, the German offensive at Kursk was intended to pinch off the Kursk salient, encircling and destroying Soviet forces within it.

success would shorten the German front line and eliminate a Soviet staging area for future offensives.

Ninth Army would attack from the north while fourth Panzer Army attacked from the south.

The two spearheads would meet east of Kursk, trapping Soviet forces.

However, the Soviets knew the German plan.

Soviet intelligence had penetrated German command structures.

Details of the operation reached Stalin weeks before the offensive began.

The Red Army used this time to prepare the most extensive defensive system ever constructed.

Multiple defensive belts extended for miles.

Trenches, minefields, anti-tank ditches, bunkers.

The Kursk defenses absorbed immense resources but created a zone no army could quickly penetrate.

The offensive began on July 5th, 1943.

Torrential rains had transformed roads into mud tracks in preceding days.

This adverse condition compelled Panza Grenaders of Das Reich to advance without crucial tank support in initial phases.

Tanks bogged down in mud.

Trucks could not move forward with supplies.

Despite obstacles, strategic deployment of Stukookers assisted Das Reich in achieving initial operational objectives, particularly securing the town of Berzov and its commanding heights.

Russian resistance intensified swiftly, subjecting SS soldiers to artillery barges and air strikes.

The scale of Soviet defensive preparations exceeded German expectations.

Minefields channeled German advances into kill zones.

Anti-tank guns positioned in depth knocked out panzas at long range.

Soviet artillery fired pre-planned concentrations on likely German assembly areas.

Thus Reich pressed forward regardless.

The division’s experienced cadray knew how to fight through defenses.

Engineers cleared lanes through minefields.

Panzas provided mobile firepower.

Grenaders exploited gaps.

Slowly, methodically, Das Reich penetrated the Soviet defensive belts.

However, at Procarovka, the division faced a formidable Soviet counterattack.

The battle of Procarovka on July 12th has been mythologized extensively.

Soviet accounts portrayed it as a brilliant defensive victory where Red Army tank forces destroyed German panzas in vast numbers.

German accounts described a costly but successful engagement.

The reality differed from both narratives.

This was not a decisive German defeat nor a brilliant Soviet victory.

It was an attritional slugfest where both sides lost heavily.

The tank battle in hills surrounding Procarovka saw massive armored clashes.

Hundreds of tanks from both sides engaged at close range.

The battlefield became a chaos of burning vehicles, explosions, and smoke.

Das Reich held ground fortified by support of Stuji tank destroyers collaborating with fellow Waffan SS divisions within second SS Panza core.

They neutralized over 300 enemy tanks.

However, Soviet losses were also severe.

Fifth Guard’s tank army, which conducted the main Soviet counterattack, lost over half its tanks.

T34s advanced on mass toward German positions.

Many were destroyed at long range by German anti-tank fire.

Others reached German lines, engaging in close-range brawls.

Soviet tankers showed great courage, but limited tactical sophistication.

Waves of T34s advanced without infantry support, making them vulnerable to German anti-tank weapons.

Subsequent days witnessed grueling attrition with both sides grappling for supremacy, but experiencing minimal terrain gains.

The battle devolved into a destructive stalemate.

German forces could not achieve breakthrough.

Soviet forces could not eliminate the German salient.

The toll on human lives and tanks was severe on both fronts.

The Red Army’s capacity to replace losses contrasted sharply with Ruffen SS divisions, especially Dust Reich, which did not enjoy such replenishment.

Russian losses, though greater than those incurred by Germans in many engagements, were offset by their ability to replenish forces.

Soviet factories produced thousands of T34s.

training programs churned out new crews.

Conversely, Rafen SS divisions, including Das Reich, faced the reality of sustaining operations with diminishing resources.

Das Reich’s casualty figures from Kursk were substantial.

Approximately 30% of combat strength was lost over the twoe operation.

This included irreplaceable veteran NCOs and junior officers, the backbone of any effective military unit.

A zukfurer with three years combat experience could not be replaced by a recent Junoula graduate, no matter how well-trained.

The tactical expertise, the ability to read a battlefield, the leadership that inspires soldiers to follow, these qualities develop only through experience.

Replacements arrived, but they lacked combat experience.

The division that emerged from Kursk was measurably weaker than the formation that had recaptured Kharkov.

This decline was not immediately apparent.

Thus, Reich remained a formidable formation.

However, the trend was clear.

Each operation consumed irreplaceable expertise.

Each casualty report included names of soldiers who could not be adequately replaced.

Following the Allied invasion of Sicily in July, demand for German divisions in the west prompted a shift in strategy.

Hitler ordered termination of Operation Zitadel.

German forces would not achieve breakthrough at Kursk.

Das Reich transitioned from offensive to defensive stance.

Throughout the latter half of 1943, the division engaged in numerous intense battles along the Mias River, again tasked with defending cities it had previously conquered.

Battles were hard with Das Reich often outnumbered.

Soviet forces had numerical superiority in most engagements.

It became a fight of attrition, though the division still performed well.

German tactical proficiency often prevailed in individual engagements.

However, tactical success could not alter strategic reality.

The Red Army advanced relentlessly, accepting heavy casualties to maintain pressure.

By mid July, Dasich relocated from the area west of Belgarot.

Counterattacks and defensive struggles ensued along the Mio Donets region, followed by engagements near Stalino and Marinovka.

August and September the 1943 witnessed continuation of defensive operations, counterattacks and battles in Kov and Pava areas.

The division’s responsibilities extended to strategic retreat over the Neper River, facing further counterattacks and defensive encounters in the Neper Bend region.

The retreat across the Neper represented a major strategic defeat for Germany.

The Neper was a formidable natural obstacle.

Hitler had ordered it held at all costs.

Soviet forces forced crossings despite heavy German resistance.

Over 5 months, Das Reich experienced relentless setbacks, reaching its Nadier with the loss of Kiev in November.

As 1943 drew to close, the division found itself reduced to combat group strength, perhaps 5,000 effective soldiers from an authorized strength of over 19,000.

Consequently, initial elements of Das Reich were transported to France.

By conclusion of April 1944, the entirety of the division had been withdrawn from the Eastern Front, marking a strategic shift in focus and commencement of a period dedicated to recovery and reorganization.

The division had been ground down by attrition.

Continuous combat from February through November had consumed the midwar veteran cadre.

On October 22nd, 1943, the division underwent transformation being redesated as 2 SS Panza Division Das Reich and subsequently re-equipped in southern France.

During spring 1944, I Panzer of Tailong underwent significant upgrade, transitioning to Panzer 5 Panther tanks.

These were superior to the Panzer 4 in armor protection and firepower.

The long 75mm gun could penetrate any allied tank at combat ranges.

Simultaneously, the heavy Panza company restructured, emerging as Shwe SS Panza of Tailong Ein equipped with Tiger 1 tanks.

Advancements in firepower occurred within SS Panza artillery regiment 2, which incorporated Wester and Hmel self-propelled howitzers.

These vehicles provided mobile artillery support capable of keeping pace with Panzer advances.

While stationed in southern France, forces of second SS Panza Division Das Reich occasionally engaged in antipartisan operations.

Shaped by prolonged combat experience on the Eastern Front, troops showed little tolerance for losses at hands of French resistance, often communist partisans.

The Eastern Front had brutalized these men.

They had seen comrades killed by partisans.

The response to harm inflicted on German personnel or damage to vehicles was frequently marked by brutal retaliation, reflecting the battleh hardened mindset of the division.

By this stage, late war decline had begun.

The influx of vermarked conscripts and replacements started to dilute the division’s character.

Some replacements came from disbanded Luftvafer or Creeks marine units, men with no infantry training.

Others were ethnic Germans from occupied territories with questionable motivation.

Training time was reduced as Germany faced manpower shortages.

Veteran NCOs and officers had been lost on the Eastern Front.

The division thus Reich after Normandy would not be the same formation as in Karkov.

The ideological cohesion and volunteer spirit of 1940 had given way to a more conventional military organization struggling with the same manpower and quality issues affecting all German formations.

However, a core of Eastern Front veterans remained, providing tactical expertise and leadership.

Upon Allied landing in Normandy on June 6th, 1944, the division received orders to relocate from its area near Bordeaux to the front lines.

The distance was approximately 750 km.

Under normal conditions, a mechanized division could cover this in 3 or 4 days.

This journey was marred by frequent sabotage and raids from French resistance and more significantly allied air superiority.

Allied air superiority made daylight movement extremely hazardous.

Continue reading….
« Prev Next »